
Dan Gherezgher
#0GuardSenior6'4"Brookfield, WI
PPG15.9
RPG3.2
APG2.7
FG%41.1
3P%37.9
FT%73.9
PPG15.9
RPG3.2
APG2.7
FG%41.1
3P%37.9
FT%73.9
Player Overview
- PTS/G15.987
- REB/G3.254
- AST/G2.768
- STL/G0.836
- BLK/G0.121
- FTA/G2.857
- PIR24.887
- EPM-1.328
Box Score
- PTS/G15.987
- REB/G3.254
- AST/G2.768
- STL/G0.836
- BLK/G0.121
- FTA/G2.857
- PIR24.887
- EPM-1.328
Shooting
- eFG%52.7%68
- TS%55.1%56
- 2P%46.2%36
- 3P%37.9%75
- 3PAr61.4%79
- FT%73.9%33
- FT Rate21.823
Advanced
- Usage%25.3%84
- AST%17.9%65
- TOV%17.1%35
- OREB%1.7%25
- HKM%1.8%18
Game Log
GP31
PTS15.8
REB3.2
AST2.8
FG%41%
Game Log
| 3/9 | L | 24 | 12 | 3/933% | 2/540% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7.5 | 101 | 133 | |
| 3/8 | W | 29 | 19 | 6/1540% | 5/956% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 12.6 | 139 | 117 | |
| 3/4 | W | @ | 25 | 17 | 5/1145% | 3/838% | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10.2 | 129 | 127 |
| 2/28 | L | 23 | 21 | 8/1362% | 4/757% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 13.6 | 141 | 142 | |
| 2/25 | W | @ | 16 | 11 | 4/757% | 3/650% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5.0 | 103 | 100 |
| 2/22 | L | @ | 21 | 5 | 1/714% | 1/333% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | -0.5 | 55 | 84 |
| 2/18 | W | 31 | 13 | 5/1436% | 2/922% | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4.4 | 93 | 109 | |
| 2/12 | W | @ | 31 | 24 | 8/1747% | 5/1145% | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16.2 | 131 | 120 |
| 2/7 | W | 38 | 22 | 8/1650% | 5/1050% | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 15.5 | 124 | 105 | |
| 2/4 | L | 24 | 3 | 1/911% | 1/714% | 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -0.5 | 54 | 112 | |
| 2/1 | L | @ | 40 | 11 | 4/1331% | 3/933% | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5.4 | 86 | 104 |
| 1/30 | L | @ | 34 | 20 | 7/1450% | 5/1050% | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 14.9 | 135 | 129 |
| 1/24 | L | @ | 39 | 30 | 12/1771% | 4/850% | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 21.6 | 143 | 127 |
| 1/17 | L | 36 | 15 | 5/1242% | 1/813% | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10.4 | 104 | 106 | |
| 1/15 | W | 23 | 15 | 4/667% | 4/580% | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 14.0 | 155 | 96 | |
| 1/11 | L | @ | 28 | 5 | 2/633% | 0/20% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.7 | 107 | 139 |
| 1/9 | W | @ | 28 | 6 | 2/1613% | 0/120% | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3.0 | 71 | 111 |
| 1/4 | W | 33 | 26 | 7/1354% | 4/757% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 20.3 | 133 | 110 | |
| 1/1 | W | 26 | 17 | 6/875% | 5/771% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13.5 | 175 | 111 | |
| 12/29 | W | @ | 35 | 14 | 4/1040% | 0/30% | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5.7 | 87 | 120 |
| 12/21 | L | 36 | 18 | 5/1533% | 3/1030% | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8.3 | 100 | 118 | |
| 12/17 | L | 31 | 3 | 1/147% | 1/911% | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -7.0 | 32 | 119 | |
| 12/13 | W | @ | 35 | 17 | 7/1547% | 2/825% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11.0 | 115 | 113 |
| 12/9 | W | BresciaNon-D1, doesn’t count | 24 | 12 | 5/1050% | 0/40% | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7.7 | 113 | 77 |
| 12/6 | L | @ | 36 | 27 | 8/1942% | 7/1450% | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 14.5 | 112 | 105 |
| 12/3 | W | 28 | 11 | 3/743% | 3/650% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 9.1 | 180 | 121 | |
| 11/29 | W | 33 | 23 | 8/2040% | 4/1136% | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9.9 | 119 | 111 | |
| 11/26 | W | 35 | 21 | 8/1942% | 3/743% | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9.5 | 103 | 118 | |
| 11/24 | W | 33 | 19 | 7/1450% | 5/956% | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 11.7 | 123 | 106 | |
| 11/20 | W | @ | 24 | 13 | 5/1436% | 3/838% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5.4 | 105 | 106 |
| 11/16 | W | Cumberland (KY)Non-D1, doesn’t count | 24 | 18 | 8/1650% | 2/540% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10.7 | 115 | 111 |
| 11/12 | L | @ | 34 | 24 | 8/1942% | 5/1242% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 12.0 | 107 | 112 |
| 11/8 | L | @ | 27 | 9 | 4/1527% | 1/813% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -0.4 | 56 | 144 |
| 11/3 | W | Cincinnati ClermontNon-D1, doesn’t count | 20 | 18 | 7/1070% | 2/540% | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12.4 | 126 | 81 |
| Totals | – | 936 | 491 | 166/40441% | 94/24838% | 86 | 14 | 100 | 26 | 2 | 72 | 73 | – | – | – |