On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,107 | 966 | -2.6— | 110.2— | 112.8— | 50.0%— | 30.8%— | 16.7%— | 46.7%— | 50.4%— | 66.0%— | 15.5%— | 38.9%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkEllisE. EllisMitchellM. MitchellDavenportJ. Davenport | 71 | 32 | 5.6— | 131.9— | 126.3— | 51.9%— | 38.5%— | 12.6%— | 96.2%— | 51.4%— | 62.2%— | 9.3%— | 45.7%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkBrazileT. BrazileLawsonC. LawsonEllisE. Ellis | 67 | 32 | 1.6— | 105.9— | 104.3— | 50.0%— | 17.9%— | 16.4%— | 36.5%— | 50.0%— | 64.5%— | 23.0%— | 23.6%— |
| MarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileLawsonC. LawsonEllisE. Ellis | 64 | 32 | 5.0— | 108.1— | 103.1— | 49.0%— | 38.2%— | 21.9%— | 54.0%— | 40.6%— | 55.6%— | 15.0%— | 23.4%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileMitchellM. Mitchell | 58 | 28 | 46.4— | 129.6— | 83.2— | 60.2%— | 29.2%— | 15.6%— | 56.8%— | 42.2%— | 70.6%— | 21.2%— | 44.4%— |
| MarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileMitchellM. MitchellDavenportJ. Davenport | 56 | 26 | -25.5— | 91.4— | 116.9— | 54.9%— | 21.7%— | 28.7%— | 19.5%— | 59.0%— | 75.0%— | 14.8%— | 8.0%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisLawsonC. LawsonEllisE. Ellis | 52 | 27 | -0.8— | 89.1— | 89.9— | 43.6%— | 14.8%— | 17.4%— | 41.0%— | 44.2%— | 74.2%— | 19.5%— | 30.2%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileEllisE. Ellis | 45 | 17 | -24.4— | 105.4— | 129.8— | 46.1%— | 22.2%— | 11.2%— | 42.1%— | 64.7%— | 73.7%— | 12.0%— | 47.1%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisMitchellM. MitchellDavenportJ. Davenport | 43 | 17 | 17.5— | 152.2— | 134.7— | 67.7%— | 30.8%— | 9.2%— | 83.9%— | 61.8%— | 60.0%— | 15.0%— | 50.0%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileLawsonC. Lawson | 42 | 22 | 16.4— | 116.5— | 100.1— | 43.8%— | 32.1%— | 7.1%— | 42.5%— | 40.0%— | 74.1%— | 13.2%— | 70.0%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkDavisD. DavisEllisE. EllisMitchellM. Mitchell | 40 | 16 | 3.4— | 151.7— | 148.3— | 75.8%— | 30.8%— | 10.1%— | 58.1%— | 59.7%— | 47.1%— | 12.6%— | 38.7%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkBrazileT. BrazileEllisE. EllisMitchellM. Mitchell | 39 | 20 | 8.9— | 130.2— | 121.3— | 60.3%— | 35.0%— | 15.3%— | 38.2%— | 57.9%— | 71.4%— | 13.7%— | 31.6%— |
| BattleK. BattleDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileEllisE. EllisMitchellM. Mitchell | 34 | 18 | -12.5— | 107.2— | 119.7— | 38.3%— | 45.8%— | 20.8%— | 53.3%— | 62.1%— | 73.7%— | 17.8%— | 27.3%— |
| BattleK. BattleMarkT. MarkLawsonC. LawsonEllisE. EllisMitchellM. Mitchell | 33 | 15 | -39.0— | 78.4— | 117.4— | 34.8%— | 29.4%— | 27.1%— | 56.5%— | 56.5%— | 76.5%— | 9.3%— | 16.1%— |
| BattleK. BattleDavisD. DavisBrazileT. BrazileLawsonC. LawsonEllisE. Ellis | 30 | 15 | -16.0— | 89.0— | 105.0— | 42.0%— | 18.8%— | 16.5%— | 28.0%— | 53.6%— | 58.3%— | 21.6%— | 17.9%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
