Austin Peay20-9

ASUNCoach: Corey Gipson

20-9NET#162

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Collin Parker	1,609	395	80.3%	+3.866	+9.292	+5.420	+4.288	−0.746	−2.788	−1.840	+4.88	+8.4100	−4.84	−18.098
Zyree Collins	1,558	446	77.7%	+4.166	+3.772	−0.452	+2.880	+2.374	+0.640	−9.88	+5.36	+2.374	+3.896	−12.596
Rashaud Marshall	1,537	467	76.7%	+6.776	+8.088	+1.440	+4.188	−1.934	−3.090	−4.626	+2.028	+5.494	−0.934	−1.962
Tate McCubbin	1,523	480	76.0%	−0.948	−5.324	−4.474	−2.228	−3.620	−1.166	+0.454	+0.544	+9.8100	−0.444	−2.162
Anton Brookshire	1,268	736	63.3%	+1.056	−0.846	−1.860	−2.526	−0.944	−0.762	+4.978	−2.172	+0.354	−0.248	−2.062
Ja'Corey Robinson	809	1,195	40.4%	+5.672	+3.268	−2.464	+0.252	+6.596	+1.428	+5.380	−5.090	−3.320	−1.330	+0.148
Matt Enright	589	1,415	29.4%	−4.832	−2.238	+2.634	−1.734	+1.364	+0.638	+2.768	+2.522	−3.220	+2.588	+2.534
Creighton Morisch	386	1,618	19.3%	−5.630	−3.632	+2.036	−1.732	+4.386	+2.216	−2.238	−1.768	−8.24	+0.356	+0.646
Travis Torain	257	1,747	12.8%	+6.074	−0.648	−6.684	+1.668	−5.710	+0.246	+2.768	−10.098	−9.82	+0.052	+6.416
Tyler Wagner	222	1,781	11.1%	−10.916	−5.324	+5.618	−0.346	−3.222	+2.316	+9.792	+2.424	+1.768	−2.712	+28.50
Quan Lax	183	1,820	9.1%	+0.552	−4.826	−5.278	+2.678	−7.06	+0.344	−17.12	+2.126	+1.566	+2.890	+1.938

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Collin Parker	1,609	395	80.3%	6.256	114.860	108.646	53.7%56	29.6%50	14.5%60	37.5%60	53.5%38	72.7%62	16.6%54	28.8%58
Zyree Collins	1,558	446	77.7%	6.556	113.858	107.350	53.5%56	30.3%52	15.2%54	35.7%56	53.8%38	71.5%58	18.6%68	29.6%56
Rashaud Marshall	1,537	467	76.7%	7.158	114.960	107.848	53.8%58	29.3%48	14.3%62	36.8%58	53.0%40	72.3%60	17.5%60	32.2%48
Tate McCubbin	1,523	480	76.0%	5.454	111.752	106.452	52.4%50	28.9%46	14.8%58	37.9%62	52.6%42	73.3%64	17.6%60	32.1%48
Anton Brookshire	1,268	736	63.3%	6.056	112.756	106.752	52.0%48	29.4%48	14.7%58	39.6%64	51.7%46	71.0%54	17.6%62	31.9%50
Ja'Corey Robinson	809	1,195	40.4%	8.962	114.960	106.054	53.0%52	33.7%66	15.8%50	41.0%68	49.6%58	69.1%46	16.9%56	32.7%46
Matt Enright	589	1,415	29.4%	2.250	111.552	109.344	51.7%48	30.7%52	15.5%52	39.7%66	54.3%34	68.6%44	19.5%74	34.4%42
Creighton Morisch	386	1,618	19.3%	1.148	110.148	109.046	51.5%46	33.2%62	16.8%40	36.0%58	51.2%50	64.5%28	17.9%64	33.1%46
Travis Torain	257	1,747	12.8%	10.764	112.554	101.864	54.3%60	24.8%28	15.2%54	40.2%66	44.1%80	62.8%22	17.7%62	38.0%34
Tyler Wagner	222	1,781	11.1%	-4.138	108.344	112.438	52.6%52	26.9%38	17.1%40	46.6%78	54.7%34	72.4%62	15.3%44	58.0%8
Quan Lax	183	1,820	9.1%	6.056	108.744	102.762	55.3%64	23.5%24	15.3%54	22.4%20	54.5%34	72.2%60	20.2%78	34.4%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Collin Parker	1,609	395	80.3%	2.450	105.638	103.360	49.5%36	30.3%52	17.2%38	39.3%64	48.7%60	64.4%28	21.4%82	46.9%18
Zyree Collins	1,558	446	77.7%	2.450	110.148	107.848	50.7%42	28.0%42	14.6%60	45.5%76	48.5%62	69.2%46	14.8%40	42.1%26
Rashaud Marshall	1,537	467	76.7%	0.446	106.840	106.452	49.7%36	31.2%54	17.3%36	41.3%68	51.1%50	66.9%38	18.4%66	34.0%44
Tate McCubbin	1,523	480	76.0%	6.356	117.066	110.842	54.6%60	32.6%60	15.8%50	37.5%60	52.2%44	63.5%24	18.0%64	34.2%44
Anton Brookshire	1,268	736	63.3%	5.054	113.558	108.548	54.5%60	30.3%52	15.5%52	34.7%54	53.8%38	70.7%52	17.8%62	33.9%44
Ja'Corey Robinson	809	1,195	40.4%	3.352	111.752	108.448	52.8%52	27.2%38	14.5%60	35.7%56	54.6%34	72.3%60	18.2%64	32.6%48
Matt Enright	589	1,415	29.4%	7.058	113.658	106.652	53.4%54	29.4%48	14.8%58	37.0%60	51.8%46	71.8%58	16.9%56	31.9%50
Creighton Morisch	386	1,618	19.3%	6.758	113.758	107.050	53.2%54	28.9%46	14.6%60	38.3%62	52.9%42	72.7%62	17.6%62	32.5%48
Travis Torain	257	1,747	12.8%	4.754	113.156	108.448	52.7%52	30.5%52	15.0%56	37.5%60	54.1%36	72.6%62	17.7%62	31.6%50
Tyler Wagner	222	1,781	11.1%	6.858	113.658	106.852	52.9%52	30.1%52	14.8%58	36.8%58	52.2%44	70.7%52	18.0%64	29.6%56
Quan Lax	183	1,820	9.1%	5.554	113.458	107.948	52.6%52	30.4%52	15.0%56	39.4%64	52.3%44	70.7%52	17.4%60	32.5%48

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.