Cal Baptist25-9

WACCoach: Kyle Getter

25-9NET#107

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominique Daniels Jr.	1,959	276	87.7%	+0.654	+11.596	+11.04	−0.248	+8.898	−5.498	−12.04	+2.226	−5.210	−2.910	−2.966
Martel Williams	1,799	436	80.5%	+3.164	−2.040	−5.176	−2.822	−0.646	−0.862	−1.940	−5.994	−2.228	−1.330	−8.288
Jayden Jackson	1,321	914	59.1%	−0.150	−4.130	−3.972	−0.742	−4.016	−0.964	−6.220	+0.246	+2.676	+0.866	−2.564
Jordan Muller	1,139	1,096	51.0%	−7.026	+0.654	+7.612	−0.742	−0.944	+0.246	+16.2100	+4.112	+0.758	+0.458	+10.96
Jonathan Griman	1,133	1,102	50.7%	+3.364	+0.052	−3.368	+2.778	−0.646	+0.442	−8.112	−5.190	−0.842	−3.86	−8.890
Bradey Henige	1,093	1,141	48.9%	+2.260	−1.840	−4.072	−1.040	+2.778	+0.442	−6.518	−2.878	+2.072	−1.130	+0.646
Thomas Ndong	920	1,314	41.2%	−3.638	−1.742	+1.938	−0.544	+0.354	+0.540	−4.528	+2.722	−1.038	+1.474	−1.258
Devon Malcolm	740	1,495	33.1%	−5.032	−3.930	+1.242	−2.326	−0.744	+0.836	−4.528	+5.66	+1.062	+4.698	−3.268
Miles Daniels	376	1,858	16.8%	+13.892	+8.088	−5.880	+1.770	+2.474	−2.182	+3.974	−5.392	−3.420	−0.346	+5.720
Rene D'Amelio	313	1,921	14.0%	+5.974	+8.188	+2.236	+6.696	+1.062	+0.934	+7.888	+0.346	−1.336	+0.560	+12.34
Monty Bowser	172	2,063	7.7%	−14.210	−16.72	−2.564	−8.34	−3.918	+4.14	+12.898	+1.830	+3.986	+2.386	+10.18
Nate Garcia	155	2,079	6.9%	−4.136	+3.772	+7.812	+3.484	−1.834	+3.18	+28.4100	+5.46	−0.544	+0.356	−12.194

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominique Daniels Jr.	1,959	276	87.7%	8.460	108.846	100.368	48.5%34	38.2%80	17.1%40	34.6%54	46.7%70	72.2%60	16.5%52	36.1%38
Martel Williams	1,799	436	80.5%	9.162	107.040	97.972	48.0%30	37.2%76	17.6%36	35.5%56	45.4%74	72.4%62	16.6%54	34.9%42
Jayden Jackson	1,321	914	59.1%	8.460	105.738	97.374	48.3%32	35.7%72	17.3%38	33.4%50	46.6%70	73.9%66	17.2%58	35.4%40
Jordan Muller	1,139	1,096	51.0%	5.054	107.642	102.662	48.2%32	36.9%76	17.8%34	44.2%74	48.5%62	73.2%64	17.0%56	41.9%26
Jonathan Griman	1,133	1,102	50.7%	10.164	107.442	97.374	49.9%36	37.0%76	17.9%34	31.9%46	44.0%80	72.4%62	14.9%40	32.3%48
Bradey Henige	1,093	1,141	48.9%	9.662	106.440	96.974	48.1%30	38.6%82	17.9%34	32.7%48	45.0%76	73.8%66	16.3%50	36.8%36
Thomas Ndong	920	1,314	41.2%	6.456	106.440	100.068	48.3%32	37.5%76	18.0%32	33.3%50	48.0%64	72.2%60	17.7%62	35.7%40
Devon Malcolm	740	1,495	33.1%	5.154	104.836	99.768	47.0%26	36.8%76	18.3%32	32.9%48	50.2%52	73.5%66	19.9%76	34.3%44
Miles Daniels	376	1,858	16.8%	19.978	114.058	94.178	50.0%36	39.3%84	15.9%48	39.1%64	42.1%86	70.0%50	16.6%54	41.2%28
Rene D'Amelio	313	1,921	14.0%	13.568	114.360	100.866	54.3%58	38.2%80	18.5%30	42.6%70	46.7%70	71.7%58	17.3%60	47.1%18
Monty Bowser	172	2,063	7.7%	-4.638	91.914	96.674	40.8%10	33.7%66	21.5%14	47.8%80	48.1%64	76.4%76	19.0%70	45.9%18
Nate Garcia	155	2,079	6.9%	4.754	110.850	106.252	51.7%48	35.6%72	20.6%18	62.6%94	51.5%48	72.4%60	17.1%58	25.2%68

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominique Daniels Jr.	1,959	276	87.7%	7.960	97.220	89.486	48.8%34	29.5%48	22.5%10	46.6%78	44.5%78	77.4%80	19.4%72	39.0%32
Martel Williams	1,799	436	80.5%	6.056	109.046	103.062	50.8%42	37.8%78	18.3%30	37.4%60	51.3%48	74.6%68	17.9%62	43.1%24
Jayden Jackson	1,321	914	59.1%	8.660	109.848	101.266	49.0%34	39.7%84	18.3%32	39.6%64	46.3%70	71.3%56	16.4%52	37.9%34
Jordan Muller	1,139	1,096	51.0%	12.166	107.140	95.078	48.9%34	37.7%78	17.6%34	27.9%36	44.4%78	72.5%62	16.7%54	31.1%52
Jonathan Griman	1,133	1,102	50.7%	6.858	107.442	100.566	47.2%28	37.6%78	17.5%36	40.0%66	49.2%58	73.3%64	18.8%68	41.1%28
Bradey Henige	1,093	1,141	48.9%	7.458	108.244	100.966	49.1%36	35.9%72	17.5%36	39.1%64	47.8%64	71.8%58	17.4%60	36.1%38
Thomas Ndong	920	1,314	41.2%	9.962	108.044	98.172	48.8%34	37.2%76	17.5%36	37.7%60	45.4%74	73.2%64	16.3%50	37.0%36
Devon Malcolm	740	1,495	33.1%	10.164	108.644	98.570	49.3%36	37.5%78	17.5%36	37.4%60	44.7%78	72.5%62	15.3%44	37.5%36
Miles Daniels	376	1,858	16.8%	6.156	106.038	99.968	48.3%32	36.9%76	18.1%32	35.2%54	47.4%66	73.4%66	16.9%56	35.5%40
Rene D'Amelio	313	1,921	14.0%	7.658	106.238	98.670	47.7%30	37.2%76	17.6%36	34.8%54	46.4%70	73.0%64	16.8%54	34.8%42
Monty Bowser	172	2,063	7.7%	9.562	108.644	99.170	49.1%36	37.6%78	17.4%36	35.0%54	46.3%70	72.5%62	16.7%54	35.7%40
Nate Garcia	155	2,079	6.9%	8.760	107.140	98.472	48.4%32	37.4%76	17.5%36	34.2%52	46.1%72	72.9%62	16.8%56	37.3%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.