Big West

Cal St. Fullerton

18-16NET#189Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #219Coach: Dedrique Taylor

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,518	1,087	2.3—	109.3—	107.0—	52.5%—	25.3%—	15.2%—	38.7%—	53.6%—	71.6%—	19.8%—	34.7%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroDe LunaK. De LunaWardJ. WardCofieldB. CofieldWilliamsC. Williams	286	131	8.2—	104.8—	96.6—	51.7%—	21.4%—	14.7%—	37.3%—	51.5%—	72.0%—	24.7%—	26.4%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardCofieldB. CofieldWilliamsC. Williams	220	101	10.3—	115.0—	104.8—	52.7%—	28.7%—	11.8%—	43.6%—	58.0%—	72.7%—	24.8%—	24.5%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroDe LunaK. De LunaWardJ. WardWhiteD. WhiteWilliamsC. Williams	97	49	-9.2—	100.8—	110.0—	50.5%—	32.7%—	19.5%—	9.9%—	56.8%—	61.0%—	23.5%—	17.3%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardGarrisK. GarrisWilliamsC. Williams	86	35	12.7—	102.6—	89.9—	45.1%—	27.7%—	15.2%—	43.7%—	50.0%—	82.9%—	24.0%—	41.4%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonWilliamsC. Williams	71	30	-4.5—	111.6—	116.1—	52.6%—	28.1%—	14.1%—	47.4%—	61.3%—	78.6%—	19.1%—	32.1%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonWhiteD. White	70	28	10.4—	123.7—	113.3—	64.7%—	34.5%—	18.7%—	31.0%—	60.4%—	72.4%—	20.9%—	32.1%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroNunnB. NunnSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardCofieldB. Cofield	57	24	45.6—	128.8—	83.2—	65.3%—	20.0%—	15.9%—	91.7%—	37.0%—	73.5%—	19.2%—	40.0%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroDe LunaK. De LunaWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonWilliamsC. Williams	51	23	-2.1—	104.4—	106.5—	44.3%—	32.4%—	7.9%—	18.9%—	51.2%—	61.5%—	23.7%—	27.9%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroDe LunaK. De LunaNunnB. NunnWardJ. WardWhiteD. White	51	20	-0.7—	104.6—	105.3—	50.0%—	22.2%—	15.8%—	33.3%—	54.4%—	75.0%—	16.2%—	11.1%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonCofieldB. Cofield	47	20	-10.9—	97.6—	108.5—	43.9%—	23.1%—	10.6%—	36.6%—	52.6%—	73.9%—	15.5%—	34.2%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroDe LunaK. De LunaWardJ. WardGarrisK. GarrisWilliamsC. Williams	44	19	-29.7—	91.2—	120.9—	35.7%—	18.2%—	18.2%—	89.3%—	63.3%—	82.4%—	17.6%—	40.0%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardWhiteD. WhiteWilliamsC. Williams	44	20	-13.2—	114.0—	127.3—	51.1%—	35.7%—	11.4%—	13.0%—	65.7%—	56.3%—	23.1%—	31.4%—
De LunaK. De LunaNunnB. NunnWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonGarrisK. Garris	41	19	12.0—	115.5—	103.5—	54.4%—	11.8%—	7.4%—	35.3%—	41.4%—	64.0%—	15.5%—	40.0%—
De La Cruz MonegroJ. De La Cruz MonegroNunnB. NunnSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardGarrisK. Garris	36	14	-16.4—	113.8—	130.2—	46.4%—	38.9%—	16.7%—	67.9%—	64.1%—	82.4%—	8.5%—	21.9%—
De LunaK. De LunaWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonCofieldB. CofieldWilliamsC. Williams	34	15	23.9—	142.1—	118.1—	63.2%—	43.8%—	8.9%—	23.5%—	69.6%—	100.0%—	16.0%—	30.4%—
SeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonGarrisK. GarrisWilliamsC. Williams	33	14	-22.6—	117.2—	139.8—	55.2%—	31.3%—	15.0%—	31.0%—	65.4%—	76.9%—	10.2%—	26.9%—
De LunaK. De LunaNunnB. NunnHendersonJ. HendersonGarrisK. GarrisWilliamsC. Williams	33	14	13.8—	106.4—	92.6—	53.4%—	11.8%—	12.2%—	13.8%—	52.3%—	76.9%—	28.7%—	31.8%—
NunnB. NunnSeamanL. SeamanCofieldB. CofieldGarrisK. GarrisWilliamsC. Williams	33	15	21.8—	115.9—	94.1—	55.2%—	26.3%—	15.2%—	27.6%—	60.0%—	84.6%—	27.3%—	8.0%—
NunnB. NunnSeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonCofieldB. Cofield	32	13	65.0—	130.1—	65.1—	76.1%—	10.0%—	18.6%—	39.1%—	38.1%—	88.2%—	27.9%—	42.9%—
SeamanL. SeamanWardJ. WardHendersonJ. HendersonCofieldB. CofieldWilliamsC. Williams	32	15	26.1—	121.0—	95.0—	55.0%—	19.0%—	3.1%—	36.7%—	45.3%—	63.6%—	17.3%—	31.3%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.