Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Central Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logo

Central Connecticut16-12

NECCoach: Patrick Sellers

16-12NET#283

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Darin Smith Jr.+24.3100+18.6100−5.780+8.9100−1.636−0.964+5.882−1.868+10.0100−1.526+7.812
Jay Rodgers+10.286+18.2100+7.912+11.6100−4.216−0.456+5.178+2.424−1.732−2.218+0.248
Max Frazier+2.662+7.286+4.624+3.584+1.870+0.442+0.656−1.666−3.818−2.712+0.446
James Jones+5.572+0.956−4.674−0.248+2.374−0.252+0.152−0.960+5.794−0.934−8.788
Melo Sanchez+6.976−1.244−8.188−0.348−0.348−0.760−13.24−1.162+3.484+3.896+2.734
Elijah Parker−1.544−9.312−7.888−4.214−0.546+1.130+6.584−2.978−0.050+3.292+1.640
Daniel James−4.234−2.836+1.440+0.152−0.150+0.146−9.610+0.542−1.732+1.980+3.330
Roddy Jones−5.230+5.580+10.76+5.092+1.768+1.524−1.544+4.310+0.354−4.14−5.980
Ashton Reynolds−11.914+9.092+20.90−0.150+7.196−1.978+2.766+5.36−9.52−3.38+2.534
Nico Ashley−2.740−7.018−4.272−5.010−3.918−2.484+6.986−1.060−8.14+3.896+5.320
Gabe Spinelli−10.316−11.78−1.458−6.86−3.422+0.934+8.390+0.148+2.678−2.810+0.448
Ja'Kobe Williams−18.36−18.12+0.248−12.52+1.364−1.370+2.968+1.434−4.414+2.386−3.068
Jayden Mott−21.64−37.70−16.198−18.32−2.528+4.54−3.830−4.790+4.590+1.476−9.892

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Darin Smith Jr.2.450110.750108.34853.1%5427.4%4016.2%4632.4%4849.6%5871.3%5413.8%3228.3%60
Jay Rodgers1.048112.254111.24054.6%6026.6%3616.2%4632.7%4850.5%5269.2%4613.5%3027.0%64
Max Frazier-0.744109.848110.54252.6%5228.3%4416.4%4431.6%4649.5%5868.6%4413.3%2827.1%64
James Jones0.546108.144107.65051.5%4628.6%4616.2%4631.4%4649.6%5871.6%5813.7%3223.9%72
Melo Sanchez1.248107.342106.15451.5%4627.6%4016.0%4826.4%3249.5%5871.0%5415.5%4628.1%60
Elijah Parker-2.442101.628104.05848.8%3427.4%4017.0%4035.7%5648.0%6469.6%4816.1%5028.0%60
Daniel James-4.438105.838110.24451.7%4827.6%4016.4%4424.6%2650.3%5268.4%4215.4%4429.3%56
Roddy Jones-5.836112.254117.92655.6%6629.1%4617.5%3630.2%4253.4%4069.8%4810.7%1622.2%78
Ashton Reynolds-11.128115.262126.31251.6%4633.5%6614.7%5833.6%5254.2%3661.9%2011.4%1829.0%58
Nico Ashley-3.840101.830105.65447.3%2824.4%2814.2%6237.4%6049.1%5862.6%2217.3%6031.6%50
Gabe Spinelli-10.62897.422108.04845.6%2224.8%2817.1%3838.8%6450.0%5871.9%5811.5%1827.3%62
Ja'Kobe Williams-17.92091.514109.44440.4%1028.8%4615.2%5434.0%5251.2%5065.6%3216.1%5024.3%72
Jayden Mott-21.11673.4294.67834.9%425.5%3220.4%1827.9%3645.7%7473.7%6615.4%4418.0%86

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Darin Smith Jr.-21.91692.114114.03444.2%1829.0%4617.1%4026.5%3251.4%4861.3%1815.3%4420.5%82
Jay Rodgers-9.33094.016103.36043.0%1430.7%5216.6%4427.6%3648.2%6470.9%5415.7%4626.8%64
Max Frazier-3.340102.630105.95449.1%3626.5%3616.0%4830.9%4451.1%5072.3%6016.0%4826.6%64
James Jones-5.038107.242112.23851.8%4826.2%3416.4%4431.4%4450.5%5265.9%3214.6%3832.6%48
Melo Sanchez-5.636108.544114.23451.8%4827.9%4216.7%4239.7%6450.6%5267.6%3811.7%2025.3%68
Elijah Parker-0.944111.050111.94053.0%5427.9%4215.9%4829.2%4050.9%5069.6%4813.0%2826.4%66
Daniel James-0.244108.644108.84651.6%4627.8%4016.3%4634.2%5249.8%5870.1%5013.5%3026.0%66
Roddy Jones-0.544106.740107.35050.6%4227.4%4016.0%4831.7%4649.1%5869.5%4814.8%4028.1%60
Ashton Reynolds0.846106.238105.45451.6%4626.4%3616.6%4230.9%4448.9%6071.4%5614.6%3826.5%66
Nico Ashley-1.144108.744109.84452.3%5028.3%4416.6%4230.5%4250.1%5270.7%5213.5%3026.2%66
Gabe Spinelli-0.244109.146109.44452.4%5028.1%4416.2%4630.5%4249.9%5869.3%4614.4%3626.9%64
Ja'Kobe Williams0.446109.648109.24652.9%5227.6%4016.4%4431.1%4449.8%5870.0%5013.8%3227.3%64
Jayden Mott0.546111.252110.74253.2%5428.0%4215.9%4831.7%4650.4%5269.2%4613.9%3427.8%62
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.