CAA

Charleston

21-11NET#181Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #122

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,606	528	75.3%	−4.9—	−0.8—	+4.1—	−0.6—	+0.5—	+0.5—	+2.5—	−2.3—	−7.4—	−1.0—	−6.4—
Martin Kalu	1,444	690	67.7%	−5.3—	−4.6—	+0.8—	−0.9—	−4.8—	+1.4—	+3.4—	−2.7—	+1.6—	−3.5—	−1.2—
Connor Hickman	1,330	804	62.3%	−8.3—	−1.7—	+6.6—	+2.2—	−7.4—	+1.4—	+7.5—	+4.4—	+4.7—	−2.3—	−3.0—
Christian Reeves	1,081	1,053	50.7%	+1.1—	+1.5—	+0.3—	+0.1—	+5.5—	+1.5—	−6.7—	+2.9—	+3.3—	+1.2—	−2.5—
Chol Machot	1,052	1,082	49.3%	−3.3—	−2.7—	+0.7—	+1.5—	−5.2—	+1.2—	+1.2—	−3.6—	−4.3—	−2.1—	−6.8—
Colby Duggan	925	1,209	43.4%	−0.1—	+2.6—	+2.8—	+2.4—	+0.5—	+0.6—	−6.6—	+0.4—	+0.2—	−1.4—	+0.9—
Chris Davis Jr.	913	1,220	42.8%	+8.0—	+4.5—	−3.5—	+0.4—	+5.1—	−1.0—	−5.1—	−2.1—	−3.5—	+1.9—	−2.5—
Chadlyn Traylor	869	1,265	40.7%	+0.2—	−2.8—	−3.0—	−3.1—	−0.5—	−2.7—	+2.0—	−2.3—	−1.3—	+0.8—	+10.6—
Jaxon Prunty	838	1,296	39.3%	+8.1—	+9.3—	+1.2—	+3.8—	+1.6—	−0.9—	+5.0—	+2.9—	−1.3—	+2.6—	+6.2—
Bryce Baker	174	1,959	8.2%	+1.1—	−3.5—	−4.6—	−7.3—	+6.6—	−2.0—	−0.8—	+0.6—	+3.6—	+0.1—	−4.1—
Kendall Taylor	151	1,982	7.1%	−15.1—	−14.6—	+0.6—	−8.8—	+3.2—	−2.5—	−11.7—	+6.8—	+2.0—	+2.0—	−3.6—
Djordje Curcic	105	2,029	4.9%	+22.0—	+5.5—	−16.6—	+0.6—	+6.6—	+0.7—	+15.1—	−3.1—	+7.0—	+7.3—	+1.1—

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,606	528	75.3%	1.8—	109.1—	107.2—	50.5%—	30.1%—	15.7%—	42.1%—	48.3%—	66.2%—	15.0%—	24.8%—
Martin Kalu	1,444	690	67.7%	1.4—	107.8—	106.5—	50.3%—	28.3%—	16.0%—	42.6%—	48.0%—	68.3%—	14.1%—	26.0%—
Connor Hickman	1,330	804	62.3%	-0.0—	108.7—	108.7—	51.5%—	27.0%—	16.1%—	44.5%—	50.5%—	69.7%—	14.3%—	25.2%—
Christian Reeves	1,081	1,053	50.7%	3.6—	110.0—	106.4—	50.7%—	32.7%—	16.3%—	38.2%—	50.3%—	69.6%—	15.8%—	25.1%—
Chol Machot	1,052	1,082	49.3%	1.4—	107.9—	106.5—	51.3%—	27.3%—	16.2%—	42.1%—	47.1%—	65.8%—	14.2%—	23.0%—
Colby Duggan	925	1,209	43.4%	3.0—	110.8—	107.8—	51.9%—	30.2%—	15.9%—	37.8%—	49.0%—	68.0%—	14.4%—	26.8%—
Chris Davis Jr.	913	1,220	42.8%	7.7—	111.9—	104.2—	50.8%—	32.8%—	15.0%—	38.6%—	47.6%—	65.9%—	16.3%—	24.9%—
Chadlyn Traylor	869	1,265	40.7%	3.2—	107.6—	104.5—	48.8%—	29.7%—	13.9%—	42.7%—	47.5%—	67.1%—	15.7%—	32.6%—
Jaxon Prunty	838	1,296	39.3%	8.0—	114.9—	106.9—	52.9%—	30.9%—	15.0%—	44.5%—	50.6%—	67.0%—	16.7%—	30.1%—
Bryce Baker	174	1,959	8.2%	4.1—	106.1—	102.0—	43.9%—	35.9%—	13.8%—	40.8%—	49.4%—	71.1%—	15.3%—	22.6%—
Kendall Taylor	151	1,982	7.1%	-11.0—	95.7—	106.7—	42.5%—	33.0%—	13.2%—	30.7%—	55.2%—	69.7%—	17.0%—	23.0%—
Djordje Curcic	105	2,029	4.9%	24.1—	114.5—	90.4—	51.2%—	36.2%—	16.2%—	55.8%—	45.8%—	74.5%—	22.1%—	27.4%—

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,606	528	75.3%	6.8—	109.9—	103.2—	51.0%—	29.6%—	15.2%—	39.6%—	50.5%—	73.6%—	16.0%—	31.2%—
Martin Kalu	1,444	690	67.7%	6.7—	112.4—	105.7—	51.2%—	33.2%—	14.6%—	39.2%—	50.7%—	66.8%—	17.6%—	27.1%—
Connor Hickman	1,330	804	62.3%	8.2—	110.3—	102.1—	49.3%—	34.4%—	14.7%—	37.0%—	46.0%—	65.0%—	16.7%—	28.2%—
Christian Reeves	1,081	1,053	50.7%	2.5—	108.6—	106.0—	50.5%—	27.2%—	14.8%—	45.0%—	47.4%—	66.2%—	14.6%—	27.6%—
Chol Machot	1,052	1,082	49.3%	4.7—	110.6—	105.9—	49.9%—	32.5%—	15.0%—	40.9%—	50.7%—	70.1%—	16.2%—	29.8%—
Colby Duggan	925	1,209	43.4%	3.1—	108.1—	105.0—	49.5%—	29.8%—	15.3%—	44.4%—	48.7%—	67.8%—	15.8%—	26.0%—
Chris Davis Jr.	913	1,220	42.8%	-0.3—	107.4—	107.7—	50.4%—	27.7%—	16.0%—	43.8%—	49.7%—	69.4%—	14.4%—	27.4%—
Chadlyn Traylor	869	1,265	40.7%	3.0—	110.4—	107.5—	51.9%—	30.2%—	16.7%—	40.6%—	49.7%—	68.4%—	14.9%—	22.0%—
Jaxon Prunty	838	1,296	39.3%	-0.1—	105.6—	105.7—	49.1%—	29.4%—	15.9%—	39.5%—	47.7%—	68.4%—	14.2%—	23.9%—
Bryce Baker	174	1,959	8.2%	3.0—	109.6—	106.6—	51.2%—	29.4%—	15.7%—	41.6%—	48.8%—	67.6%—	15.2%—	26.6%—
Kendall Taylor	151	1,982	7.1%	4.2—	110.3—	106.2—	51.3%—	29.7%—	15.7%—	42.4%—	48.3%—	67.7%—	15.1%—	26.6%—
Djordje Curcic	105	2,029	4.9%	2.0—	109.0—	107.0—	50.6%—	29.6%—	15.5%—	40.8%—	49.0%—	67.5%—	14.9%—	26.3%—

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.