Charleston20-11

CAACoach: John Groce

20-11NET#169

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,574	515	75.4%	−3.736	+0.152	+3.828	−0.348	+0.860	+0.344	+3.370	−2.372	−7.74	−0.640	−5.878
Martin Kalu	1,414	674	67.7%	−4.732	−4.526	+0.248	−0.842	−5.212	+1.428	+5.680	−2.776	+1.868	−3.28	−1.860
Connor Hickman	1,330	759	63.7%	−6.128	−1.542	+4.622	+1.972	−7.16	+0.934	+7.988	+3.912	+5.192	−1.624	−3.468
Christian Reeves	1,052	1,037	50.4%	+1.858	+1.660	−0.250	+0.052	+5.692	+1.426	−5.424	+2.522	+3.282	+1.170	−2.364
Chol Machot	1,035	1,053	49.6%	−4.036	−2.836	+1.242	+1.668	−5.310	+1.328	−0.252	−3.382	−4.214	−2.020	−7.284
Colby Duggan	925	1,164	44.3%	+1.456	+2.866	+1.440	+2.274	+0.960	+0.244	−6.718	−0.050	+0.354	−0.934	+0.744
Chris Davis Jr.	895	1,193	42.9%	+6.374	+3.872	−2.664	−0.050	+5.492	−0.862	−6.718	−1.868	−3.718	+1.880	−2.866
Chadlyn Traylor	850	1,238	40.7%	−0.948	−3.532	−2.664	−3.618	−0.448	−2.888	+1.158	−2.374	−1.436	+0.560	+10.56
Jaxon Prunty	810	1,279	38.8%	+8.280	+9.092	+0.844	+3.786	+1.970	−0.558	+4.776	+2.424	−1.238	+2.284	+5.620
Bryce Baker	174	1,914	8.4%	+2.160	−3.432	−5.578	−7.44	+6.996	−2.282	−0.748	+0.346	+3.686	+0.458	−4.272
Kendall Taylor	120	1,969	5.7%	−29.22	−14.94	+14.42	−7.64	+1.264	−1.674	−13.94	+13.30	−0.544	−0.836	−0.554

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,574	515	75.4%	1.348	109.246	108.048	50.7%42	29.9%50	15.8%50	42.3%70	48.5%62	66.0%32	14.8%40	25.1%68
Martin Kalu	1,414	674	67.7%	0.746	107.842	107.150	50.4%42	27.9%42	16.2%46	43.3%72	48.2%64	68.3%42	13.9%32	25.8%66
Connor Hickman	1,330	759	63.7%	-0.046	108.744	108.746	51.5%46	27.0%38	16.1%48	44.5%74	50.5%52	69.7%48	14.3%36	25.2%68
Christian Reeves	1,052	1,037	50.4%	3.150	110.048	106.950	50.7%42	32.5%60	16.4%44	38.8%64	50.3%52	69.5%48	15.5%44	25.2%68
Chol Machot	1,035	1,053	49.6%	0.246	107.842	107.650	51.6%46	27.0%38	16.4%44	41.3%68	47.5%66	65.8%32	13.9%34	23.0%76
Colby Duggan	925	1,164	44.3%	3.050	110.850	107.848	51.9%48	30.2%52	15.9%48	37.8%60	49.0%60	68.0%40	14.4%36	26.8%64
Chris Davis Jr.	895	1,193	42.9%	5.856	111.452	105.554	50.7%42	32.8%62	15.3%54	37.7%60	48.0%64	65.7%32	15.9%48	24.8%70
Chadlyn Traylor	850	1,238	40.7%	1.648	107.140	105.554	48.6%34	29.5%48	14.1%62	42.1%70	47.7%66	67.0%38	15.2%44	32.6%48
Jaxon Prunty	810	1,279	38.8%	7.258	114.760	107.550	53.0%52	30.9%54	15.4%52	44.3%74	50.5%52	67.0%38	16.2%50	29.8%56
Bryce Baker	174	1,914	8.4%	4.152	106.138	102.064	43.9%16	35.9%72	13.8%66	40.8%68	49.4%58	71.1%54	15.3%44	22.6%76
Kendall Taylor	120	1,969	5.7%	-25.312	95.218	120.520	43.6%16	30.9%54	14.2%62	28.4%38	61.6%12	67.3%38	14.1%34	25.9%66

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jlynn Counter	1,574	515	75.4%	5.054	109.246	104.258	50.9%44	29.1%46	15.5%52	39.0%64	50.8%52	73.7%66	15.4%44	30.8%52
Martin Kalu	1,414	674	67.7%	5.454	112.254	106.952	51.3%44	33.1%62	14.8%58	37.8%60	50.9%50	66.6%32	17.1%58	27.7%62
Connor Hickman	1,330	759	63.7%	6.156	110.248	104.058	49.6%36	34.1%66	15.2%54	36.6%58	46.6%70	64.7%28	15.9%48	28.6%60
Christian Reeves	1,052	1,037	50.4%	1.348	108.444	107.150	50.7%42	26.9%38	15.0%56	44.2%74	47.8%66	66.2%32	14.4%36	27.6%62
Chol Machot	1,035	1,053	49.6%	4.252	110.650	106.452	49.9%36	32.3%60	15.1%56	41.5%68	50.8%52	70.0%48	15.9%48	30.1%54
Colby Duggan	925	1,164	44.3%	1.648	107.942	106.452	49.7%36	29.3%48	15.6%50	44.4%74	49.1%58	67.7%38	15.3%44	26.1%66
Chris Davis Jr.	895	1,193	42.9%	-0.544	107.642	108.148	50.7%42	27.4%40	16.1%48	44.4%74	49.8%58	69.4%46	14.2%34	27.6%62
Chadlyn Traylor	850	1,238	40.7%	2.550	110.650	108.148	52.2%50	29.9%50	16.9%40	41.0%68	50.0%58	68.4%42	14.7%38	22.1%78
Jaxon Prunty	810	1,279	38.8%	-1.044	105.738	106.752	49.3%36	29.0%46	15.9%48	39.6%64	48.1%64	68.3%42	14.1%34	24.3%72
Bryce Baker	174	1,914	8.4%	2.048	109.548	107.550	51.4%46	29.1%46	15.9%48	41.5%68	49.0%60	67.5%38	14.9%40	26.8%64
Kendall Taylor	120	1,969	5.7%	3.952	110.148	106.252	51.2%44	29.7%50	15.8%50	42.3%70	48.3%62	67.8%40	15.0%42	26.4%66

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.