NEC

Chicago St.

7-25NET#342Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #324Coach: Landon Bussie

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	1,958	934	-16.9—	98.6—	115.5—	45.2%—	28.2%—	15.6%—	29.4%—	56.9%—	65.4%—	20.2%—	37.0%—
ByardS. ByardBushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray	153	67	2.1—	112.1—	110.0—	50.0%—	37.0%—	14.3%—	28.9%—	56.3%—	70.0%—	20.8%—	40.0%—
CoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson	117	75	-15.4—	92.7—	108.1—	43.1%—	23.2%—	12.9%—	18.5%—	60.2%—	66.0%—	26.6%—	21.4%—
BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleyOwensJ. OwensRayC. Ray	75	29	-19.9—	111.9—	131.8—	56.3%—	33.3%—	20.0%—	27.0%—	69.0%—	95.7%—	9.4%—	35.7%—
BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIICoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray	64	29	-14.1—	102.9—	117.0—	44.3%—	33.3%—	12.5%—	24.6%—	60.3%—	75.0%—	15.5%—	23.1%—
BushB. BushCoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray	58	31	-29.9—	89.8—	119.7—	43.8%—	35.5%—	19.0%—	7.1%—	69.8%—	77.8%—	20.8%—	32.6%—
ByardS. ByardBushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIISandsC. SandsRayC. Ray	57	21	-47.7—	101.4—	149.2—	44.2%—	24.1%—	10.5%—	25.0%—	72.6%—	46.7%—	20.2%—	58.1%—
ByardS. ByardBushB. BushTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray	40	18	-31.1—	87.8—	118.9—	41.0%—	32.0%—	15.1%—	15.4%—	66.7%—	84.6%—	21.3%—	33.3%—
Cockrill IIID. Cockrill IIICoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson	37	21	12.5—	114.4—	102.0—	55.2%—	31.3%—	19.1%—	41.4%—	56.3%—	68.4%—	26.6%—	46.9%—
ByardS. ByardBushB. BushGibsonC. GibsonTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray	34	18	-33.7—	79.6—	113.3—	48.1%—	7.1%—	20.6%—	15.4%—	50.0%—	60.0%—	12.3%—	50.0%—
ByardS. ByardTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson	32	18	-17.9—	97.3—	115.2—	39.4%—	27.3%—	6.3%—	18.2%—	47.2%—	52.4%—	14.8%—	16.7%—
BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray	31	11	6.6—	111.1—	104.5—	43.8%—	21.4%—	6.5%—	66.7%—	67.6%—	100.0%—	22.7%—	0.0%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.