Poss1,958
Net Rtg-16.920
ORtg98.624
DRtg115.530
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,958 | 934 | -16.920 | 98.624 | 115.530 | 45.2%22 | 28.2%44 | 15.6%50 | 29.4%40 | 56.9%24 | 65.4%30 | 20.2%78 | 37.0%36 |
| ByardS. ByardBushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray | 153 | 67 | 2.150 | 112.154 | 110.044 | 50.0%36 | 37.0%76 | 14.3%62 | 28.9%38 | 56.3%26 | 70.0%48 | 20.8%80 | 40.0%30 |
| CoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson | 117 | 75 | -15.422 | 92.714 | 108.148 | 43.1%14 | 23.2%24 | 12.9%72 | 18.5%14 | 60.2%14 | 66.0%32 | 26.6%96 | 21.4%80 |
| BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleyOwensJ. OwensRayC. Ray | 75 | 29 | -19.918 | 111.952 | 131.88 | 56.3%68 | 33.3%66 | 20.0%20 | 27.0%34 | 69.0%2 | 95.7%100 | 9.4%10 | 35.7%40 |
| BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIICoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray | 64 | 29 | -14.124 | 102.932 | 117.028 | 44.3%18 | 33.3%66 | 12.5%74 | 24.6%26 | 60.3%14 | 75.0%70 | 15.5%44 | 23.1%74 |
| BushB. BushCoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray | 58 | 31 | -29.910 | 89.812 | 119.722 | 43.8%16 | 35.5%72 | 19.0%26 | 7.1%2 | 69.8%2 | 77.8%80 | 20.8%80 | 32.6%48 |
| ByardS. ByardBushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIISandsC. SandsRayC. Ray | 57 | 21 | -47.74 | 101.428 | 149.20 | 44.2%18 | 24.1%28 | 10.5%84 | 25.0%26 | 72.6%0 | 46.7%2 | 20.2%78 | 58.1%8 |
| ByardS. ByardBushB. BushTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray | 40 | 18 | -31.110 | 87.810 | 118.924 | 41.0%10 | 32.0%58 | 15.1%56 | 15.4%8 | 66.7%4 | 84.6%94 | 21.3%82 | 33.3%44 |
| Cockrill IIID. Cockrill IIICoxD. CoxTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson | 37 | 21 | 12.566 | 114.460 | 102.064 | 55.2%64 | 31.3%54 | 19.1%26 | 41.4%68 | 56.3%28 | 68.4%42 | 26.6%96 | 46.9%18 |
| ByardS. ByardBushB. BushGibsonC. GibsonTankersleyM. TankersleyRayC. Ray | 34 | 18 | -33.78 | 79.64 | 113.336 | 48.1%30 | 7.1%2 | 20.6%18 | 15.4%8 | 50.0%58 | 60.0%14 | 12.3%24 | 50.0%14 |
| ByardS. ByardTankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. RayRobinsonM. Robinson | 32 | 18 | -17.920 | 97.322 | 115.232 | 39.4%8 | 27.3%40 | 6.3%96 | 18.2%12 | 47.2%68 | 52.4%4 | 14.8%40 | 16.7%90 |
| BushB. BushCockrill IIID. Cockrill IIITankersleyM. TankersleySandsC. SandsRayC. Ray | 31 | 11 | 6.658 | 111.152 | 104.556 | 43.8%16 | 21.4%20 | 6.5%96 | 66.7%94 | 67.6%4 | 100.0%100 | 22.7%86 | 0.0%100 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.