Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Cincinnati logoCincinnati logoCincinnati logoCincinnati logo

Cincy22-15

Big 12Coach: Wes Miller

22-15NET#31

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
John Newman III+0.852+0.050−0.854+0.152−3.820−0.962+5.682+1.632−2.032+2.786−6.682
Simas Lukosius+10.584+3.670−6.982+3.786−1.538+1.230−1.544−4.486+0.152+0.660−1.054
Dan Skillings Jr.+4.468+9.190+4.724+0.858+7.196−1.368+4.878+0.742+0.052−1.036+9.110
Day Day Thomas−5.232−1.940+3.432−1.040−0.944+0.344+1.158+2.426−1.934+2.686+3.828
Jizzle James+2.660−0.248−2.864−0.644+1.564−0.656−4.626−1.262+4.888−1.824−1.154
Aziz Bandaogo+1.456+0.854−0.652+1.870+1.464+2.218+4.074−2.372−5.410+0.458−3.770
Viktor Lakhin+2.760+3.368+0.646+1.668+1.968−0.556−2.340+1.334−0.646−0.248−3.670
Jamille Reynolds−20.64−12.46+8.112−4.612−0.844+2.516−9.310+4.710+2.978−1.922−0.250
Josh Reed−1.444−3.434−2.060−1.436−1.042−0.556−0.450−2.372−2.430+0.356+4.426
CJ Fredrick Jr.−0.946+5.980+6.816+1.364−1.142−2.684+1.962+3.318+1.162−1.428+1.042
Ody Oguama+0.050−7.716−7.884−2.228−5.610−0.658−2.936−0.656+7.998+0.762−7.786

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
John Newman III9.462109.452100.16650.3%4637.2%7617.6%4229.2%4848.3%6072.3%6617.9%5626.9%56
Simas Lukosius12.268110.55498.37051.4%5037.9%7818.2%3827.2%4246.6%6873.0%6817.3%5228.4%50
Dan Skillings Jr.10.664112.458101.86250.6%4840.6%8417.4%4429.1%4848.1%6072.9%6816.9%5031.7%40
Day Day Thomas7.260108.750101.56249.9%4238.0%7817.9%4028.0%4448.8%5672.2%6418.1%5830.2%44
Jizzle James10.664109.35098.86850.0%4239.1%8217.5%4225.2%3647.2%6475.5%7816.2%4428.1%52
Aziz Bandaogo9.964109.95299.96651.3%5039.1%8219.0%3229.8%5046.6%6870.0%5417.4%5426.7%56
Viktor Lakhin10.764111.356100.66451.2%5039.4%8217.5%4226.3%3848.6%5872.6%6617.1%5026.7%56
Jamille Reynolds-6.136100.230106.35046.9%3237.7%7819.7%2820.8%2451.4%4475.2%7815.7%4228.5%50
Josh Reed8.060106.84498.86849.3%4037.5%7817.4%4427.3%4246.2%6871.2%6017.4%5432.0%40
CJ Fredrick Jr.8.462114.062105.65251.3%5037.5%7615.8%5429.1%4850.4%4873.8%7216.0%4429.5%46
Ody Oguama9.262103.03693.87848.5%3833.6%6217.3%4425.2%3647.4%6479.5%8817.8%5622.3%70

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
John Newman III8.662109.452100.96450.2%4641.1%8618.5%3623.6%3246.7%6674.4%7415.2%3833.5%34
Simas Lukosius1.750106.844105.15447.7%3439.3%8217.0%4628.6%4651.0%4672.8%6816.8%4829.4%48
Dan Skillings Jr.6.258103.33697.17249.8%4233.6%6218.7%3424.4%3447.4%6472.9%6817.8%5622.6%70
Day Day Thomas12.468110.65498.27051.0%4838.9%8017.7%4226.9%4046.4%6874.1%7415.6%4026.4%58
Jizzle James7.960109.552101.66250.6%4837.6%7818.1%3829.8%5048.4%5870.7%5818.0%5829.2%48
Aziz Bandaogo8.562109.150100.66449.5%4237.7%7816.8%4625.8%3848.9%5675.4%7817.0%5030.5%44
Viktor Lakhin8.060108.048100.06649.6%4237.5%7618.0%3828.6%4647.3%6473.2%7017.3%5230.3%44
Jamille Reynolds14.572112.76098.17051.5%5238.5%8017.2%4430.0%5046.6%6872.2%6617.7%5628.8%50
Josh Reed9.564110.354100.86450.6%4838.6%8018.0%4027.7%4448.4%5873.6%7017.1%5227.6%54
CJ Fredrick Jr.9.362108.24898.86850.0%4638.5%8018.4%3627.2%4247.2%6472.7%6617.5%5428.5%50
Ody Oguama9.162110.754101.66250.7%4839.2%8217.9%4028.1%4448.0%6271.6%6217.1%5030.0%46
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.