CincyCincinnati18-15

Big 12Coach: Jerrod Calhoun

18-15NET#48

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Day Day Thomas	1,696	575	74.7%	+11.388	+8.290	−3.066	+2.374	−1.438	−2.282	−3.332	−1.162	+1.262	+0.560	−2.162
Baba Miller	1,672	598	73.7%	+9.184	+7.788	−1.458	+1.264	+4.688	−1.776	+9.092	−5.994	+0.456	−6.62	−0.956
Moustapha Thiam	1,447	824	63.7%	+7.378	+2.464	−4.976	+0.456	−5.310	−3.794	−0.250	−2.574	+4.892	−1.426	−5.376
Jalen Celestine	1,292	978	56.9%	−1.046	+5.680	+6.616	+2.678	+1.466	−0.252	−2.934	+3.912	−0.248	−1.230	−1.358
Jizzle James	1,149	1,121	50.6%	−0.648	+10.694	+11.24	+3.886	−0.942	−2.686	−9.610	+3.018	−3.122	−4.04	−1.560
Sencire Harris	893	1,377	39.3%	+0.152	−5.922	−6.082	−4.116	−0.448	−2.584	−2.636	+1.730	+0.456	+6.5100	+5.320
Kerr Kriisa	707	1,563	31.2%	−5.530	−11.38	−5.980	−2.922	−0.942	+4.92	+1.862	−2.878	+4.088	+0.560	+3.430
Shon Abaev	696	1,575	30.6%	−4.334	−6.020	−1.758	−1.832	−3.420	+0.442	+8.890	−1.162	+1.364	−0.542	+0.944
Keyshuan Tillery	665	1,606	29.3%	−3.736	−1.144	+2.734	+1.568	−1.140	+0.738	+2.264	+0.642	−2.724	+0.560	+0.348
Tyler McKinley	526	1,745	23.1%	−8.920	−6.120	+2.832	+0.658	−2.728	+3.28	−3.532	+3.714	−0.644	+3.292	+10.08
Halvine Dzellat	363	1,907	16.0%	+0.654	−0.350	−0.954	−1.038	+9.3100	+3.110	+1.158	+0.544	−5.98	+3.292	−6.984
Jordi Rodriguez	227	2,044	10.0%	−5.830	−10.110	−4.372	−6.06	+8.398	+6.10	+7.588	−3.784	−2.626	+0.966	−2.766

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Day Day Thomas	1,696	575	74.7%	10.264	107.342	97.174	51.0%44	30.2%52	16.4%44	28.9%38	47.3%68	73.0%62	18.4%66	29.6%56
Baba Miller	1,672	598	73.7%	9.762	107.242	97.574	50.7%42	31.8%58	16.5%44	32.1%46	46.1%72	72.8%62	16.5%52	30.0%56
Moustapha Thiam	1,447	824	63.7%	10.062	106.038	96.176	50.6%42	28.6%46	15.6%50	29.7%40	46.7%70	74.4%68	17.8%62	28.2%60
Jalen Celestine	1,292	978	56.9%	6.958	107.642	100.766	51.5%46	31.1%54	16.9%40	28.5%38	49.3%58	72.6%62	17.8%62	29.6%56
Jizzle James	1,149	1,121	50.6%	7.058	110.450	103.560	52.3%50	30.1%52	15.7%50	25.1%28	49.0%60	71.1%54	16.3%50	29.4%56
Sencire Harris	893	1,377	39.3%	7.258	101.628	94.478	48.0%30	30.3%52	15.5%52	28.2%36	48.6%62	72.9%62	22.1%86	33.4%44
Kerr Kriisa	707	1,563	31.2%	3.652	97.422	93.880	48.4%32	29.9%50	20.4%18	31.0%44	45.6%74	75.5%72	18.6%68	32.6%48
Shon Abaev	696	1,575	30.6%	4.354	101.028	96.774	49.1%36	28.1%44	17.2%38	36.0%56	46.8%70	73.6%66	18.0%64	30.8%52
Keyshuan Tillery	665	1,606	29.3%	4.754	104.434	99.868	51.5%46	29.7%50	17.5%36	31.3%44	48.0%64	70.8%52	18.7%68	30.3%54
Tyler McKinley	526	1,745	23.1%	0.546	100.526	100.068	50.9%44	28.4%44	19.4%24	27.0%34	50.5%52	72.2%60	20.7%80	37.9%34
Halvine Dzellat	363	1,907	16.0%	7.860	105.036	97.274	49.5%36	38.2%80	19.6%24	30.7%42	48.0%64	67.8%40	20.9%80	24.5%70
Jordi Rodriguez	227	2,044	10.0%	2.150	96.120	94.080	45.0%20	38.0%80	22.5%10	36.5%58	44.2%80	70.3%50	19.1%70	27.7%62

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Day Day Thomas	1,696	575	74.7%	-1.144	99.024	100.168	48.7%34	31.5%56	18.6%28	32.2%48	48.4%62	71.8%58	17.9%64	31.7%50
Baba Miller	1,672	598	73.7%	0.646	99.526	98.970	49.5%36	27.2%38	18.2%32	23.1%22	52.0%46	72.3%60	23.1%88	30.8%52
Moustapha Thiam	1,447	824	63.7%	2.750	103.734	101.066	50.1%42	34.0%66	19.3%24	29.9%40	49.1%58	69.6%48	19.2%72	33.5%44
Jalen Celestine	1,292	978	56.9%	7.860	102.030	94.278	48.9%34	29.7%50	17.1%40	31.4%46	45.4%74	72.8%62	19.0%70	30.9%52
Jizzle James	1,149	1,121	50.6%	7.658	99.826	92.282	48.4%32	31.0%54	18.3%32	34.7%54	46.0%72	74.2%68	20.3%78	31.0%52
Sencire Harris	893	1,377	39.3%	7.158	107.542	100.468	52.0%50	30.7%52	17.9%34	30.8%44	46.9%68	72.5%62	15.5%46	28.1%60
Kerr Kriisa	707	1,563	31.2%	9.062	108.744	99.768	51.3%44	30.8%54	15.4%52	29.2%40	48.4%62	71.4%58	18.1%64	29.2%58
Shon Abaev	696	1,575	30.6%	8.660	107.040	98.472	50.9%44	31.6%56	16.8%40	27.2%34	47.9%64	72.3%60	18.4%66	29.9%56
Keyshuan Tillery	665	1,606	29.3%	8.460	105.536	97.174	50.0%36	30.9%54	16.8%42	29.1%40	47.4%66	73.5%66	18.1%64	30.1%54
Tyler McKinley	526	1,745	23.1%	9.462	106.640	97.274	50.3%42	31.1%54	16.2%46	30.5%42	46.8%70	72.8%62	17.5%60	28.0%60
Halvine Dzellat	363	1,907	16.0%	7.258	105.236	98.072	50.6%42	28.9%46	16.5%44	29.6%40	47.5%66	73.7%66	17.8%62	31.3%52
Jordi Rodriguez	227	2,044	10.0%	7.960	106.238	98.372	51.0%44	29.7%50	16.3%46	29.0%38	48.0%64	73.0%62	18.2%64	30.4%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.