Clemson24-12

ACCCoach: Brad Brownell

24-12NET#23

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joseph Girard III	1,522	158	90.6%	−23.14	−4.628	+18.40	+0.860	−0.350	+1.922	−5.522	+13.90	+6.094	+1.472	+5.620
Chase Hunter	1,494	186	88.9%	−11.016	−4.030	+7.016	−4.910	+8.998	+4.74	+15.298	+0.940	−3.222	−3.78	−8.688
Ian Schieffelin	1,261	419	75.1%	−6.030	+5.578	+11.56	−2.724	+4.486	−3.488	+8.290	+7.02	+2.776	−2.516	−3.266
PJ Hall	1,253	427	74.6%	−10.118	+0.854	+10.96	+1.466	+0.354	+1.132	−1.444	+7.32	−1.438	−0.740	−6.782
Chauncey Wiggins	790	890	47.0%	−1.744	−3.134	−1.558	−1.536	−4.118	+0.148	+0.152	−1.464	−1.140	+0.762	+9.110
Jack Clark	785	895	46.7%	+10.986	+2.362	−8.686	+4.490	−5.610	−0.556	−1.246	−3.380	+5.894	−1.428	−3.268
Dillon Hunter	566	1,115	33.7%	+8.780	+1.156	−7.684	−2.328	+1.968	−3.388	+1.762	−4.888	−3.818	+1.574	−4.172
RJ Godfrey	551	1,130	32.8%	+2.760	−2.836	−5.576	−0.842	+2.270	+0.736	−7.914	−4.286	−4.016	+2.584	−1.658

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joseph Girard III	1,522	158	90.6%	5.556	115.266	109.742	54.4%66	29.0%42	14.6%64	29.0%48	51.1%46	71.8%64	14.5%32	33.1%36
Chase Hunter	1,494	186	88.9%	6.558	115.166	108.644	53.8%62	30.0%46	14.9%60	31.3%54	49.6%54	70.7%58	13.9%30	31.6%42
Ian Schieffelin	1,261	419	75.1%	6.258	117.070	110.738	53.7%62	30.1%48	13.6%70	31.5%54	51.3%46	71.8%64	13.7%28	31.7%40
PJ Hall	1,253	427	74.6%	5.156	115.868	110.740	54.7%66	29.1%42	14.7%62	29.2%48	51.4%44	70.6%58	14.2%30	30.7%44
Chauncey Wiggins	790	890	47.0%	6.958	113.962	107.048	53.6%62	26.9%34	14.4%64	29.6%50	48.7%58	70.5%56	14.7%34	37.4%26
Jack Clark	785	895	46.7%	13.670	116.870	103.258	56.7%74	25.9%30	14.1%68	28.9%48	47.8%62	74.0%72	13.6%26	30.8%44
Dillon Hunter	566	1,115	33.7%	13.570	116.368	102.860	52.8%58	30.2%48	12.2%80	30.7%52	46.4%68	68.7%48	15.3%40	29.8%46
RJ Godfrey	551	1,130	32.8%	9.564	113.762	104.256	53.8%64	30.4%48	14.9%62	24.3%34	46.7%66	68.4%48	16.0%44	31.4%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joseph Girard III	1,522	158	90.6%	28.688	119.876	91.282	53.6%62	29.3%44	12.7%76	34.5%62	37.1%94	65.9%36	13.0%24	27.5%54
Chase Hunter	1,494	186	88.9%	17.676	119.174	101.662	58.6%82	21.1%16	10.2%88	16.1%12	48.7%58	73.8%72	17.6%54	40.1%22
Ian Schieffelin	1,261	419	75.1%	12.268	111.556	99.268	56.4%74	25.6%30	16.9%46	23.3%30	44.3%76	69.1%50	16.2%44	34.8%32
PJ Hall	1,253	427	74.6%	15.272	115.064	99.866	53.3%60	28.8%42	13.6%70	30.6%52	44.1%78	72.0%64	14.8%36	37.4%26
Chauncey Wiggins	790	890	47.0%	8.662	117.170	108.546	55.0%68	31.0%52	14.4%66	29.5%48	50.1%50	71.5%62	14.0%30	28.3%50
Jack Clark	785	895	46.7%	2.752	114.564	111.936	52.3%56	31.5%54	14.6%64	30.1%50	51.0%46	68.3%48	15.0%36	34.0%34
Dillon Hunter	566	1,115	33.7%	4.856	115.266	110.440	55.1%68	28.3%40	15.5%56	28.9%48	51.2%46	72.4%66	13.8%28	33.9%34
RJ Godfrey	551	1,130	32.8%	6.958	116.568	109.642	54.6%66	28.3%40	14.2%66	32.2%56	50.9%46	72.4%66	13.5%26	33.0%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.