Clemson24-11

ACCCoach: Brad Brownell

24-11NET#36

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dillon Hunter	1,526	653	70.0%	−10.316	−8.614	+1.738	−1.536	−4.614	+1.920	−1.840	+0.940	−2.824	+1.676	−0.956
Jestin Porter	1,458	721	66.9%	+8.380	+4.976	−3.568	+4.390	−1.438	+0.048	−2.238	−0.150	−0.346	+1.576	−7.084
RJ Godfrey	1,312	867	60.2%	+12.592	+7.988	−4.674	+2.880	+7.698	+0.244	−10.86	−2.576	−0.348	−0.540	−2.666
Nick Davidson	1,195	983	54.9%	−11.214	−7.416	+3.828	−5.78	+2.878	+0.344	−2.636	−0.150	−1.930	−0.346	+7.114
Butta Johnson	1,138	1,041	52.2%	−5.630	−2.438	+3.230	−2.128	−5.212	−2.484	−1.244	+1.928	+2.172	−0.346	+5.620
Jake Wahlin	1,104	1,075	50.7%	+2.762	+2.866	+0.248	+1.566	+1.970	−0.252	−7.016	+0.246	+2.880	−2.020	−1.156
Ace Buckner	1,083	1,096	49.7%	−9.220	+1.862	+11.04	+0.960	+0.658	+0.540	+10.694	+3.018	−5.68	−1.526	+5.620
Carter Welling	1,063	1,116	48.8%	−9.918	−8.614	+1.242	−1.634	−4.614	+1.624	+0.556	+2.126	+3.080	+0.152	−5.478
Chase Thompson	497	1,682	22.8%	+7.078	−1.840	−8.890	−1.732	−2.726	−1.166	+6.484	−2.878	+0.252	+1.880	−10.292
Zac Foster	333	1,846	15.3%	+20.298	+8.890	−11.494	−0.742	+7.898	−1.370	+10.594	−6.594	+3.786	−0.836	+1.142
Dallas Thomas	161	2,018	7.4%	+21.498	+18.5100	−2.866	+11.2100	+0.556	−0.760	+7.186	−0.758	−0.940	+3.092	+15.42

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dillon Hunter	1,526	653	70.0%	6.356	108.844	102.562	51.9%48	26.4%36	14.9%58	35.4%56	49.3%58	72.7%62	17.9%64	33.3%44
Jestin Porter	1,458	721	66.9%	12.166	113.056	100.966	53.8%56	27.2%38	14.3%62	35.2%54	49.0%60	73.5%66	18.0%64	31.3%52
RJ Godfrey	1,312	867	60.2%	14.370	114.560	100.268	53.4%54	30.7%52	14.4%60	31.9%46	48.0%64	73.5%66	17.3%58	32.6%48
Nick Davidson	1,195	983	54.9%	4.354	108.042	103.760	49.8%36	28.9%46	14.5%60	34.8%54	49.0%60	72.7%62	17.3%60	36.8%36
Butta Johnson	1,138	1,041	52.2%	6.758	110.248	103.560	51.3%46	25.3%32	13.2%70	35.4%56	49.9%58	74.6%68	17.3%60	36.4%38
Jake Wahlin	1,104	1,075	50.7%	10.764	112.756	102.164	53.0%54	28.7%46	14.2%62	32.6%48	49.1%58	75.0%70	16.5%52	33.1%46
Ace Buckner	1,083	1,096	49.7%	4.854	112.354	107.550	52.8%52	28.1%42	14.6%60	41.4%68	50.5%52	70.8%52	16.7%54	36.4%38
Carter Welling	1,063	1,116	48.8%	4.354	106.940	102.662	51.5%46	25.3%32	15.2%54	36.2%58	50.1%52	75.1%72	17.5%60	30.8%52
Chase Thompson	497	1,682	22.8%	14.870	110.048	95.278	51.0%44	25.6%32	13.5%68	40.9%68	46.9%68	73.7%66	18.9%70	25.8%66
Zac Foster	333	1,846	15.3%	26.586	118.870	92.382	51.7%48	34.3%66	13.2%70	44.8%74	43.5%82	76.7%78	16.8%56	34.6%42
Dallas Thomas	161	2,018	7.4%	29.188	128.586	99.470	62.7%88	28.2%44	13.7%66	42.5%70	48.4%62	72.7%62	20.2%78	48.0%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dillon Hunter	1,526	653	70.0%	16.674	117.366	100.866	53.3%54	30.9%54	13.0%70	37.2%60	48.4%62	75.5%72	16.4%52	34.3%44
Jestin Porter	1,458	721	66.9%	3.852	108.144	104.358	49.4%36	28.7%46	14.3%62	37.4%60	49.1%58	73.8%66	16.5%52	38.3%32
RJ Godfrey	1,312	867	60.2%	1.848	106.640	104.756	50.6%42	23.1%24	14.2%62	42.7%70	50.6%52	73.7%66	17.8%62	35.2%40
Nick Davidson	1,195	983	54.9%	15.572	115.462	99.968	55.5%64	26.1%34	14.1%62	37.4%60	49.1%58	74.6%68	17.6%62	29.8%56
Butta Johnson	1,138	1,041	52.2%	12.366	112.654	100.368	53.4%54	30.6%52	15.6%52	36.5%58	48.1%64	72.5%62	17.6%62	30.7%54
Jake Wahlin	1,104	1,075	50.7%	8.060	109.948	101.964	51.6%46	26.8%38	14.4%60	39.5%64	48.9%60	72.1%60	18.5%68	34.2%44
Ace Buckner	1,083	1,096	49.7%	14.068	110.450	96.576	51.9%48	27.5%40	14.1%64	30.8%44	47.5%66	76.4%76	18.2%64	30.8%52
Carter Welling	1,063	1,116	48.8%	14.170	115.662	101.464	53.1%54	29.9%50	13.5%66	35.7%56	48.0%64	72.2%60	17.4%60	36.2%38
Chase Thompson	497	1,682	22.8%	7.760	111.752	104.058	52.7%52	28.4%44	14.6%60	34.5%54	49.7%58	73.5%66	17.1%58	36.0%38
Zac Foster	333	1,846	15.3%	6.356	110.048	103.760	52.4%50	26.5%36	14.5%60	34.3%52	50.0%58	73.0%64	17.6%60	33.4%44
Dallas Thomas	161	2,018	7.4%	7.860	110.048	102.262	51.5%46	27.7%40	14.4%62	35.4%56	49.1%58	73.6%66	17.2%58	32.6%48

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.