Creighton16-18

Big EastCoach: Alan Huss

16-18NET#79

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Josh Dix	1,826	419	81.4%	+7.778	+4.174	−3.570	+2.174	−7.06	−4.194	−7.614	−2.070	−2.724	+1.272	−2.564
Jasen Green	1,551	694	69.1%	+5.372	+2.062	−3.368	+1.364	−11.62	−4.996	−3.034	−4.790	+1.162	−3.18	−2.866
Nik Graves	1,502	743	66.9%	+5.372	+9.392	+4.026	+1.870	−0.844	−4.796	+1.862	+2.028	+1.364	−1.230	−2.766
Austin Swartz	1,103	1,141	49.1%	−6.428	−0.150	+6.316	+1.062	−2.330	−0.760	−12.14	+4.212	+0.252	+0.764	+1.640
Isaac Traudt	1,044	1,200	46.5%	+6.676	+1.962	−4.774	+2.880	−1.636	+0.638	−6.020	−3.080	+3.684	−1.920	−6.180
Blake Harper	1,034	1,211	46.0%	+3.766	+2.264	−1.558	−0.840	+5.592	+1.328	+11.296	−1.464	−4.216	+0.662	−2.966
Fedor Zugic	903	1,342	40.2%	−10.816	−9.412	+1.440	−4.612	−3.222	+1.624	+7.988	−0.858	+1.666	−1.624	+8.312
Ty Davis	606	1,638	27.0%	−5.928	−7.218	−1.356	−1.338	+0.556	+3.38	−3.432	+0.050	+0.556	+0.662	−1.760
Hudson Greer	494	1,751	22.0%	−9.318	−3.930	+5.420	−0.148	−2.430	+1.032	+5.782	+2.028	−1.930	−0.640	+6.716
Owen Freeman	472	1,772	21.0%	+5.772	−2.636	−8.388	−4.812	+8.098	+0.146	+1.560	−2.878	−3.220	+3.696	−5.980
Kerem Konan	412	1,833	18.4%	−5.130	+0.352	+5.520	+1.870	+5.994	+4.24	+0.756	+7.82	+6.296	+2.184	+11.64
Jackson McAndrew	130	2,115	5.8%	+6.876	+3.670	−3.266	−0.644	+13.8100	+3.28	+0.454	+1.136	−2.328	+3.394	−12.696
Shane Thomas	107	2,138	4.8%	+10.086	+9.092	−1.156	+5.794	+20.0100	+7.50	+18.8100	+3.714	+5.394	+2.990	+13.04

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Josh Dix	1,826	419	81.4%	1.948	110.048	108.048	53.6%56	24.9%28	15.4%52	26.7%32	50.7%52	70.4%50	14.0%34	24.6%70
Jasen Green	1,551	694	69.1%	2.150	109.848	107.750	53.6%56	22.6%22	14.7%58	27.1%34	49.7%58	71.1%54	12.9%26	24.3%72
Nik Graves	1,502	743	66.9%	2.250	112.354	110.044	53.8%56	25.9%34	14.6%58	28.6%38	51.7%46	71.3%56	13.4%30	24.2%72
Austin Swartz	1,103	1,141	49.1%	-2.840	109.146	111.940	53.7%56	25.0%32	15.9%48	22.1%20	53.2%40	70.9%54	14.2%34	25.9%66
Isaac Traudt	1,044	1,200	46.5%	4.152	110.248	106.152	54.7%62	25.3%32	16.6%44	24.9%26	49.4%58	72.7%62	12.8%26	21.9%78
Blake Harper	1,034	1,211	46.0%	2.550	110.450	107.948	52.7%52	29.2%48	16.9%40	34.2%52	50.3%52	68.7%44	14.1%34	23.5%74
Fedor Zugic	903	1,342	40.2%	-6.036	103.532	109.544	50.3%42	24.3%28	17.2%38	32.9%48	50.6%52	71.8%58	12.9%26	30.1%54
Ty Davis	606	1,638	27.0%	-3.840	103.934	107.748	52.2%50	26.6%36	18.6%28	25.6%30	51.0%50	71.2%54	14.3%36	23.8%72
Hudson Greer	494	1,751	22.0%	-6.834	106.138	112.936	53.1%54	24.3%28	17.0%40	32.6%48	52.6%42	69.3%46	13.3%30	30.3%54
Owen Freeman	472	1,772	21.0%	5.054	107.140	102.164	49.4%36	32.3%60	16.3%46	29.2%40	48.9%60	68.3%42	16.7%54	20.5%82
Kerem Konan	412	1,833	18.4%	-3.740	109.548	113.236	54.6%60	31.0%54	19.7%22	28.6%38	57.6%22	76.1%74	15.5%46	34.8%42
Jackson McAndrew	130	2,115	5.8%	6.958	112.654	105.754	52.6%52	39.1%82	19.3%24	28.4%38	52.1%44	68.7%44	17.0%56	13.2%94
Shane Thomas	107	2,138	4.8%	10.164	117.768	107.650	58.6%78	45.3%94	23.4%8	46.0%76	54.5%34	75.9%74	16.6%54	37.5%36

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Josh Dix	1,826	419	81.4%	-5.736	105.838	111.540	51.4%46	31.9%58	19.6%22	34.3%52	52.7%42	73.0%64	12.8%26	27.1%64
Jasen Green	1,551	694	69.1%	-3.140	107.842	111.042	52.3%50	34.2%66	19.6%22	30.1%42	54.3%34	70.1%50	16.0%48	27.1%64
Nik Graves	1,502	743	66.9%	-3.140	103.032	106.154	51.9%48	26.7%38	19.4%24	26.9%32	49.7%58	70.0%48	14.6%38	26.9%64
Austin Swartz	1,103	1,141	49.1%	3.752	109.246	105.654	52.7%52	27.3%40	16.6%44	34.1%52	49.0%60	70.8%52	13.5%30	24.3%72
Isaac Traudt	1,044	1,200	46.5%	-2.640	108.344	110.942	51.9%48	26.9%38	15.9%48	30.9%44	52.5%44	69.1%46	14.7%38	28.0%60
Blake Harper	1,034	1,211	46.0%	-1.244	108.244	109.444	53.6%56	23.7%26	15.6%52	23.0%22	51.7%46	72.8%62	13.5%30	26.4%66
Fedor Zugic	903	1,342	40.2%	4.954	113.056	108.148	55.0%62	27.5%40	15.6%52	25.0%26	51.3%48	70.2%50	14.5%38	21.8%78
Ty Davis	606	1,638	27.0%	2.150	111.152	109.046	53.5%56	26.0%34	15.3%54	29.0%38	51.0%50	70.7%52	13.6%32	25.6%68
Hudson Greer	494	1,751	22.0%	2.650	110.148	107.550	53.2%54	26.7%38	16.0%48	26.9%32	50.6%52	71.3%56	14.0%34	23.6%74
Owen Freeman	472	1,772	21.0%	-0.744	109.748	110.442	54.2%58	24.3%28	16.2%46	27.7%36	51.6%48	71.6%58	13.0%28	26.4%66
Kerem Konan	412	1,833	18.4%	1.448	109.146	107.750	52.9%52	25.1%32	15.4%52	27.9%36	49.8%58	69.9%48	13.4%30	23.2%74
Jackson McAndrew	130	2,115	5.8%	0.146	109.046	108.946	53.2%54	25.3%32	16.0%48	28.0%36	51.0%50	71.0%54	13.6%32	25.8%66
Shane Thomas	107	2,138	4.8%	0.046	108.844	108.746	52.9%52	25.2%32	15.9%48	27.2%34	50.9%50	70.6%52	13.7%32	24.5%70

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.