Davidson18-14

A10Coach: Matt McKillop

18-14NET#115

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Parker Friedrichsen	1,320	708	65.1%	−13.710	−5.224	+8.610	−1.734	−2.430	+1.132	+2.868	+5.86	−2.526	+1.778	+0.844
Josh Scovens	1,194	834	58.9%	−5.032	+1.156	+6.118	−0.742	+6.696	−0.862	−4.926	+4.012	+2.374	−1.328	−5.478
Devin Brown	1,168	860	57.6%	−5.828	−8.314	−2.564	−4.414	−0.250	+0.244	+0.454	+2.920	+3.886	+3.594	−0.452
Sam Brown	1,126	902	55.5%	+2.360	+0.052	−2.362	+1.568	−1.240	−0.150	−8.212	−1.464	−4.514	+2.082	−15.398
Roberts Blums	1,098	930	54.1%	+7.478	+2.866	−4.674	+2.778	+0.354	+1.624	+6.884	−5.792	+2.272	−3.56	+10.36
Nick Coval	945	1,084	46.6%	+6.876	+5.780	−1.156	−0.150	+2.776	−1.776	+6.986	−2.272	−0.150	−2.118	+5.720
Hunter Adam	773	1,255	38.1%	+0.352	−0.350	−0.652	+0.354	−5.310	+0.836	+1.962	−1.262	−1.732	−0.444	+4.126
Ian Platteeuw	736	1,292	36.3%	−9.318	+1.560	+10.86	+2.880	+2.272	+2.018	−13.84	+11.10	+1.162	+2.184	−7.886
Sean Logan	589	1,440	29.0%	+4.368	−4.826	−9.190	−1.436	−2.926	−1.572	+1.560	−12.498	−3.916	−2.614	+0.646
JaQualon Roberts	571	1,457	28.2%	+5.372	+3.772	−1.658	−1.238	+1.668	−1.878	+8.992	−0.150	+0.252	+0.256	+3.032
Manie Joses	374	1,654	18.5%	+8.080	+3.370	−4.774	+1.668	−2.132	−0.762	−3.234	−1.970	+1.466	+0.866	−0.150
RJ Greer	126	1,902	6.2%	−10.118	+4.978	+15.02	−0.050	+2.576	−1.776	−0.648	+7.22	−1.336	−3.010	+0.844
Joe Hurlburt	115	1,913	5.7%	+19.198	−3.532	−22.798	+0.658	−3.720	+3.56	+3.270	−6.094	+7.398	+5.8100	−0.754

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Parker Friedrichsen	1,320	708	65.1%	-2.640	106.138	108.746	52.1%50	27.2%38	16.2%46	31.7%46	53.0%40	69.4%46	18.0%64	37.1%36
Josh Scovens	1,194	834	58.9%	0.246	108.444	108.248	52.4%50	30.7%52	15.5%52	28.7%38	52.5%42	71.3%56	16.9%56	34.6%42
Devin Brown	1,168	860	57.6%	-0.246	104.434	104.756	50.8%42	28.0%42	15.9%48	30.9%44	52.2%44	72.0%60	18.9%70	36.6%38
Sam Brown	1,126	902	55.5%	3.352	107.942	104.756	53.4%54	27.5%40	15.8%50	27.1%34	50.3%52	68.3%42	18.3%66	30.1%54
Roberts Blums	1,098	930	54.1%	5.756	109.246	103.660	54.0%58	28.2%44	16.6%44	33.9%52	48.3%62	71.3%54	15.8%48	41.5%26
Nick Coval	945	1,084	46.6%	5.956	110.950	105.156	52.6%52	29.5%48	14.9%56	34.4%52	49.7%58	70.2%50	16.3%50	39.8%30
Hunter Adam	773	1,255	38.1%	2.450	107.842	105.354	52.9%52	24.7%28	16.3%46	31.9%46	50.2%52	69.3%46	17.2%58	39.3%30
Ian Platteeuw	736	1,292	36.3%	-3.840	108.946	112.736	54.4%60	29.5%48	17.1%38	22.0%20	58.2%20	71.1%54	18.8%70	31.7%50
Sean Logan	589	1,440	29.0%	5.154	104.534	99.470	51.7%48	26.0%34	14.8%58	31.8%46	42.5%84	67.8%40	15.6%46	37.2%36
JaQualon Roberts	571	1,457	28.2%	6.156	110.650	104.556	51.8%48	29.2%48	14.5%60	37.1%60	50.8%50	70.5%52	17.6%60	38.9%32
Manie Joses	374	1,654	18.5%	8.760	110.650	101.964	54.0%58	26.3%34	15.2%54	28.1%36	49.4%58	71.4%56	18.0%64	36.7%38
RJ Greer	126	1,902	6.2%	-7.334	112.554	119.822	52.7%52	30.4%52	14.3%62	30.1%42	57.7%22	69.1%46	14.6%38	37.5%36
Joe Hurlburt	115	1,913	5.7%	20.478	104.636	84.290	53.3%54	24.6%28	19.2%26	33.7%52	45.2%76	77.2%78	22.9%88	36.1%38

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Parker Friedrichsen	1,320	708	65.1%	11.264	111.352	100.168	53.7%56	29.6%50	15.1%54	28.9%38	47.2%68	71.9%58	16.3%50	36.3%38
Josh Scovens	1,194	834	58.9%	5.254	107.342	102.164	53.1%54	24.0%28	16.3%46	33.7%52	48.5%62	69.0%46	18.2%64	40.0%30
Devin Brown	1,168	860	57.6%	5.654	112.756	107.150	55.2%64	28.2%44	15.7%50	30.4%42	49.3%58	68.2%42	15.4%44	37.0%36
Sam Brown	1,126	902	55.5%	1.048	107.942	106.950	51.8%48	28.7%46	15.9%48	35.3%54	51.7%46	72.9%62	16.3%52	45.4%20
Roberts Blums	1,098	930	54.1%	-1.842	106.440	108.248	51.3%44	27.9%42	14.9%56	27.1%34	54.0%36	69.1%46	19.3%72	31.2%52
Nick Coval	945	1,084	46.6%	-0.944	105.336	106.252	52.7%52	26.8%38	16.6%42	27.5%34	51.9%46	70.4%52	18.4%66	34.1%44
Hunter Adam	773	1,255	38.1%	2.150	108.044	105.954	52.6%52	30.0%50	15.5%52	30.0%42	51.4%48	71.0%54	17.5%60	35.2%40
Ian Platteeuw	736	1,292	36.3%	5.454	107.442	101.964	51.6%46	27.3%40	15.1%56	35.9%56	47.1%68	70.0%48	16.7%54	39.4%30
Sean Logan	589	1,440	29.0%	0.948	109.346	108.548	53.1%54	28.9%46	16.3%46	30.2%42	54.9%32	71.8%58	18.2%64	36.6%38
JaQualon Roberts	571	1,457	28.2%	0.746	106.940	106.152	53.0%52	27.6%40	16.3%46	28.2%36	50.9%50	70.3%50	17.3%60	35.9%38
Manie Joses	374	1,654	18.5%	0.746	107.342	106.652	52.4%50	28.4%44	16.0%48	31.3%44	51.3%48	70.0%50	17.2%58	36.8%36
RJ Greer	126	1,902	6.2%	2.850	107.642	104.856	52.7%52	27.9%42	15.9%48	30.7%42	50.5%52	70.4%52	17.6%60	36.7%36
Joe Hurlburt	115	1,913	5.7%	1.248	108.144	106.950	52.7%52	28.3%44	15.6%50	30.5%42	51.2%50	69.9%48	17.1%58	36.8%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.