Dayton22-11

A10Coach: Anthony Grant

22-11NET#71

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Enoch Cheeks	1,778	336	84.1%	+9.484	+11.996	+2.534	+6.898	+9.4100	+2.714	−4.526	−2.878	−3.320	−2.020	−7.284
Nate Santos	1,769	345	83.7%	−0.648	+15.1100	+15.82	+7.398	+0.354	−2.180	+5.480	+4.112	−5.210	−2.912	+1.242
Javon Bennett	1,646	469	77.8%	+5.472	+8.288	+2.834	+4.992	−3.522	−2.078	−1.842	−1.666	−1.634	−2.316	+0.448
Malachi Smith	1,443	672	68.2%	−3.738	+4.072	+7.714	+4.692	−3.422	−0.962	+0.152	+4.410	+1.668	−1.230	−1.860
Zed Key	953	1,162	45.1%	−0.450	+1.862	+2.236	−1.140	+3.784	+1.922	+13.098	−0.960	−5.310	+1.068	−3.568
Amaël L'Etang	889	1,225	42.0%	+2.662	−4.328	−6.982	+0.858	−5.610	−0.152	−9.410	−1.060	+4.388	+0.864	−2.966
Posh Alexander	841	1,274	39.8%	+1.858	−4.428	−6.280	−5.010	+2.474	+0.442	+5.078	−3.986	+0.758	+0.356	+1.342
Jacob Conner	468	1,646	22.1%	−5.132	−12.16	−7.084	−7.34	−0.150	+0.442	−2.438	+2.424	+0.960	+5.3100	+7.314
Jaiun Simon	332	1,782	15.7%	−4.434	−17.62	−13.296	−9.92	−0.844	+1.428	−0.450	−2.778	+3.582	+4.298	−1.558
Isaac Jack	244	1,871	11.5%	−8.622	+4.976	+13.42	+3.484	+3.078	−1.876	−14.12	+5.46	−0.546	−3.68	+8.012
Hamad Mousa	169	1,945	8.0%	+7.880	−1.842	−9.690	+2.174	−5.112	+0.738	−6.418	−1.970	+7.598	−1.036	+0.546

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Enoch Cheeks	1,778	336	84.1%	7.360	115.464	108.146	54.1%62	32.3%56	16.4%52	36.7%68	51.0%48	69.0%50	17.4%52	30.7%46
Nate Santos	1,769	345	83.7%	5.656	116.066	110.440	54.3%62	30.8%50	15.6%58	38.2%70	52.0%44	68.7%48	17.3%52	31.9%42
Javon Bennett	1,646	469	77.8%	7.060	115.364	108.446	54.1%62	29.9%46	15.5%58	37.0%68	51.0%48	69.2%50	17.2%50	31.8%42
Malachi Smith	1,443	672	68.2%	4.554	114.864	110.242	54.5%64	29.5%44	15.7%58	37.4%68	52.8%40	70.0%56	17.4%52	31.1%44
Zed Key	953	1,162	45.1%	5.556	114.562	109.044	52.4%54	32.8%58	17.0%46	44.7%82	50.9%50	66.7%38	18.3%58	29.8%48
Amaël L'Etang	889	1,225	42.0%	7.360	111.054	103.858	53.5%60	27.5%36	15.9%56	32.0%56	50.8%50	72.1%64	18.2%58	30.0%46
Posh Alexander	841	1,274	39.8%	6.858	110.854	104.058	50.1%46	32.1%56	16.2%54	40.3%74	49.0%58	69.9%54	17.9%56	32.5%40
Jacob Conner	468	1,646	22.1%	1.850	104.138	102.262	47.4%30	30.6%50	16.2%52	35.5%66	53.3%36	70.3%56	21.9%80	37.6%28
Jaiun Simon	332	1,782	15.7%	2.050	98.726	96.774	44.7%22	30.1%48	17.1%46	37.0%68	49.1%56	72.5%66	21.3%76	30.5%46
Isaac Jack	244	1,871	11.5%	-1.944	117.870	119.722	56.0%70	33.3%62	14.4%66	25.0%34	56.2%24	69.0%50	14.6%32	38.8%26
Hamad Mousa	169	1,945	8.0%	13.068	111.956	98.970	55.0%66	26.0%30	16.6%50	31.4%54	49.7%56	76.3%82	16.9%48	32.2%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Enoch Cheeks	1,778	336	84.1%	-2.144	103.536	105.654	47.3%30	22.9%20	13.7%72	41.2%76	53.8%34	72.3%66	19.4%66	37.9%28
Nate Santos	1,769	345	83.7%	6.258	100.830	94.678	46.9%28	30.5%48	17.7%42	32.9%58	47.9%62	73.9%72	20.2%70	30.7%46
Javon Bennett	1,646	469	77.8%	1.650	107.144	105.554	49.3%38	33.3%62	17.5%42	38.8%72	52.6%40	70.8%58	19.6%68	31.4%44
Malachi Smith	1,443	672	68.2%	8.262	110.854	102.660	49.9%40	33.0%58	16.5%50	37.3%68	48.4%60	68.5%48	18.6%60	32.9%40
Zed Key	953	1,162	45.1%	6.058	112.758	106.750	53.5%60	29.1%42	15.1%62	31.7%54	51.8%44	72.0%64	17.3%52	33.4%38
Amaël L'Etang	889	1,225	42.0%	4.756	115.364	110.640	52.7%56	33.1%58	16.0%54	41.3%76	51.8%44	67.7%44	17.4%52	32.9%40
Posh Alexander	841	1,274	39.8%	5.156	115.364	110.242	55.0%66	29.7%46	15.8%56	35.4%64	52.9%38	69.2%52	17.6%54	31.2%44
Jacob Conner	468	1,646	22.1%	6.960	116.266	109.344	54.7%66	30.7%50	15.9%56	37.9%70	50.9%50	69.3%52	16.6%46	30.3%46
Jaiun Simon	332	1,782	15.7%	6.458	116.366	109.942	54.6%64	30.8%50	15.7%56	37.4%68	51.8%44	69.0%50	17.1%50	31.9%42
Isaac Jack	244	1,871	11.5%	6.758	113.060	106.352	52.6%56	30.4%48	16.1%54	39.1%72	50.8%50	69.6%54	18.1%58	30.8%44
Hamad Mousa	169	1,945	8.0%	5.156	113.760	108.546	52.9%58	31.1%52	15.9%56	37.9%70	51.5%46	68.9%50	17.8%56	31.7%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.