Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
A10
Dayton logo

Dayton

23-11NET#77Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #54Coach: Anthony Grant
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Nate Santos−1.6+14.2+15.9+7.1+1.0−1.6+3.6+4.8−4.7−2.3+3.1
Enoch Cheeks+3.9+9.8+5.9+4.9+7.3+1.9−5.0−0.3−2.7−1.8−1.7
Javon Bennett+5.8+9.3+3.5+5.6−4.1−2.4−1.8−0.9−2.0−1.9+0.0
Malachi Smith−5.0+2.9+7.9+3.9−2.4−0.1−0.2+4.3+1.3−1.5−1.1
Zed Key−1.8+1.6+3.4−1.4+3.3+1.8+12.4−0.2−5.1+0.9−2.1
Amaël L'Etang+2.8−4.6−7.4+0.8−4.3+0.5−9.3−1.1+4.5+1.0−2.4
Posh Alexander+0.5−4.5−5.0−5.2+2.1+0.3+4.5−3.2+0.7+0.3+2.5
Jacob Conner−4.2−11.5−7.2−6.6+1.7+1.2−2.3+1.2+0.1+4.6+4.5
Jaiun Simon−3.6−16.8−13.2−9.9−1.6+0.9+0.4−2.8+4.0+3.8−2.1
Isaac Jack−5.4+6.3+11.8+3.9+1.7−2.5−12.0+4.0−1.2−3.8+3.5
Hamad Mousa+14.7+1.9−12.8+4.2−2.9+0.7−3.9−4.9+4.6−1.0−6.8

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Nate Santos6.2116.0109.954.5%31.1%15.7%38.2%51.8%68.7%17.4%31.5%
Enoch Cheeks7.3115.4108.154.1%32.3%16.4%36.7%51.0%69.0%17.4%30.7%
Javon Bennett7.8115.7107.954.5%29.9%15.5%37.2%50.8%69.1%17.3%31.0%
Malachi Smith4.9114.5109.754.5%30.0%16.0%37.5%52.4%70.0%17.3%30.6%
Zed Key5.5114.5109.052.4%32.8%17.0%44.7%50.9%66.7%18.3%29.8%
Amaël L'Etang8.1110.9102.853.7%28.4%16.3%32.2%50.4%72.1%18.4%29.5%
Posh Alexander6.8110.8104.050.1%32.1%16.2%40.3%49.0%69.9%17.9%32.5%
Jacob Conner3.3104.8101.548.2%32.1%16.9%35.8%52.0%69.6%21.3%34.5%
Jaiun Simon3.499.596.145.0%29.6%16.7%37.9%48.7%72.9%21.0%29.2%
Isaac Jack1.7119.1117.456.6%32.4%13.8%27.2%54.5%68.5%14.4%34.0%
Hamad Mousa19.8115.395.557.0%28.3%16.7%34.1%46.6%73.6%16.9%24.9%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Nate Santos7.8101.894.047.3%30.0%17.4%34.6%47.0%73.4%19.7%28.3%
Enoch Cheeks3.4105.6102.249.2%25.0%14.4%41.7%51.2%71.7%19.3%32.3%
Javon Bennett2.0106.4104.348.9%33.9%17.9%38.9%51.7%71.0%19.2%30.9%
Malachi Smith9.9111.6101.850.6%32.5%16.1%37.7%48.1%68.6%18.8%31.7%
Zed Key7.3112.9105.553.8%29.4%15.2%32.3%51.1%71.8%17.4%31.9%
Amaël L'Etang5.4115.5110.252.9%32.7%15.8%41.5%51.5%67.7%17.3%32.0%
Posh Alexander6.3115.3109.055.2%30.0%15.9%35.8%52.3%69.3%17.7%30.0%
Jacob Conner7.6116.3108.754.8%30.5%15.7%38.1%50.7%69.5%16.7%30.0%
Jaiun Simon7.0116.3109.354.8%31.2%15.9%37.5%51.5%68.9%17.1%31.3%
Isaac Jack7.1112.8105.652.7%30.7%16.3%39.2%50.5%69.7%18.2%30.5%
Hamad Mousa5.1113.4108.352.8%31.1%15.9%37.9%51.5%69.0%17.9%31.7%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.