Delaware14-20

CAACoach: Martin Ingelsby

14-20NET#225

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Camden	1,962	264	88.1%	−2.044	+15.5100	+17.40	+4.792	−2.132	−7.198	+5.782	+10.20	−0.842	−3.96	−10.392
Cavan Reilly	1,720	506	77.3%	−1.844	+3.772	+5.520	+1.972	−5.012	−2.584	+4.878	+1.632	+3.986	−4.16	+0.844
Erik Timko	1,678	548	75.4%	+3.666	+8.790	+5.122	+3.080	−6.38	−5.296	+7.086	+0.840	+0.456	−0.740	+4.824
Izaiah Pasha	1,663	563	74.7%	+7.578	+11.996	+4.426	+8.5100	+1.262	+0.738	+1.662	−1.566	−5.68	−2.218	+5.918
Niels Lane	1,552	674	69.7%	+7.880	−2.040	−9.990	+0.758	−2.034	+1.034	+2.266	−6.194	−4.912	+1.678	−7.486
Macon Emory	766	1,460	34.4%	−5.930	−10.510	−4.674	−4.512	+1.162	+3.68	−1.842	+2.524	+9.4100	+2.184	+2.236
Trent Middleton Jr.	727	1,499	32.6%	+7.278	−3.334	−10.592	−2.228	+2.372	+1.132	−2.438	−3.180	+3.080	+3.594	+7.114
Tahron Allen	468	1,758	21.0%	−5.032	−3.732	+1.342	−3.220	−1.934	−3.290	−11.46	−1.262	−6.18	+0.458	−3.970
Kevin Kogbara	219	2,007	9.9%	−14.410	−17.04	−2.664	−8.84	+8.498	+7.60	−6.020	+3.020	+2.878	+1.474	−16.398
Houston Emory	173	2,053	7.8%	−1.446	−1.940	−0.552	−2.426	+10.6100	+5.62	+6.384	−2.072	−10.42	+3.192	+8.012
Gabe Moss	130	2,097	5.8%	−17.26	−9.212	+8.012	−1.634	+1.162	+2.614	−13.24	+2.028	−0.644	−2.614	−4.674

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Camden	1,962	264	88.1%	-3.142	112.458	115.528	55.7%70	23.7%22	16.0%54	31.1%54	53.0%38	66.1%38	15.0%34	30.7%46
Cavan Reilly	1,720	506	77.3%	-3.242	111.456	114.730	55.6%70	22.7%20	16.3%52	31.5%54	52.2%42	67.1%42	14.6%32	32.0%42
Erik Timko	1,678	548	75.4%	-2.044	112.758	114.730	55.9%70	22.4%20	15.6%58	32.2%56	52.1%42	66.3%38	15.3%36	33.1%38
Izaiah Pasha	1,663	563	74.7%	-0.946	113.660	114.532	57.3%76	24.3%24	17.0%46	30.8%52	51.5%46	64.9%34	14.9%34	33.3%38
Niels Lane	1,552	674	69.7%	-0.446	109.952	110.440	55.3%68	23.3%22	17.1%46	31.1%54	50.1%50	64.9%34	16.0%42	29.7%48
Macon Emory	766	1,460	34.4%	-6.736	103.736	110.440	52.2%54	24.7%26	19.2%30	29.2%48	53.5%36	72.5%66	16.8%48	33.3%38
Trent Middleton Jr.	727	1,499	32.6%	2.050	108.348	106.352	53.6%60	25.5%30	17.6%42	28.8%46	49.8%56	68.2%46	17.9%56	36.8%30
Tahron Allen	468	1,758	21.0%	-6.836	107.646	114.432	52.7%56	22.5%20	14.3%68	21.5%24	50.9%50	61.5%22	15.8%40	28.8%52
Kevin Kogbara	219	2,007	9.9%	-15.822	95.320	111.140	47.2%30	31.5%52	23.7%10	25.0%34	54.5%32	68.8%48	16.7%46	17.2%84
Houston Emory	173	2,053	7.8%	-4.140	108.850	112.934	52.9%58	33.8%62	22.0%16	36.2%66	50.0%54	56.7%12	18.3%60	39.2%24
Gabe Moss	130	2,097	5.8%	-19.018	101.932	120.920	53.6%60	25.0%26	19.3%30	18.0%16	53.8%34	65.6%36	13.0%22	27.5%56

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

John Camden	1,962	264	88.1%	-1.146	96.922	98.072	51.0%48	25.8%30	23.1%12	25.4%36	42.8%82	66.9%42	18.9%62	41.0%22
Cavan Reilly	1,720	506	77.3%	-1.444	107.746	109.144	53.6%60	27.8%38	18.8%34	26.7%40	50.7%50	63.2%28	18.6%60	31.2%44
Erik Timko	1,678	548	75.4%	-5.638	104.038	109.544	52.9%56	28.7%42	20.8%22	25.1%36	51.3%48	65.9%38	16.0%42	28.3%52
Izaiah Pasha	1,663	563	74.7%	-8.532	101.732	110.142	48.8%38	23.1%22	16.4%52	29.2%48	53.0%38	70.5%56	17.1%50	27.5%56
Niels Lane	1,552	674	69.7%	-8.332	112.056	120.220	54.6%64	25.3%28	16.2%54	28.9%46	56.2%24	69.8%54	14.3%30	37.1%28
Macon Emory	766	1,460	34.4%	-0.946	114.262	115.030	56.7%74	23.6%22	15.6%58	31.0%52	51.1%48	63.1%26	14.7%32	31.1%44
Trent Middleton Jr.	727	1,499	32.6%	-5.238	111.656	116.826	55.8%70	23.2%22	16.5%50	31.2%54	52.8%40	65.2%36	14.3%30	29.7%48
Tahron Allen	468	1,758	21.0%	-1.844	111.356	113.134	55.8%70	24.4%26	17.5%42	33.0%58	52.1%42	67.5%44	15.4%38	32.7%40
Kevin Kogbara	219	2,007	9.9%	-1.444	112.258	113.634	56.0%70	23.1%22	16.1%54	31.0%52	51.6%46	65.9%38	15.3%38	33.5%38
Houston Emory	173	2,053	7.8%	-2.742	110.754	113.434	55.3%68	23.1%22	16.4%52	29.9%50	52.0%42	67.1%42	15.2%36	31.2%44
Gabe Moss	130	2,097	5.8%	-1.844	111.154	112.934	55.2%68	23.9%24	16.7%48	31.2%54	51.8%44	66.2%38	15.6%40	32.1%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.