DePaul14-20

Big EastCoach: Chris Holtmann

14-20NET#129

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Rivera	1,494	713	67.7%	−4.236	−5.424	−1.256	+0.656	−8.42	+0.148	−3.532	+1.334	+1.464	+1.474	−1.760
CJ Gunn	1,418	789	64.3%	−8.922	−5.822	+3.132	−2.724	−3.918	−2.078	−2.238	+0.742	−2.924	−0.050	+0.348
Layden Blocker	1,357	851	61.5%	−12.712	−13.96	−1.256	−7.06	−4.216	−0.964	−5.820	+0.642	+0.556	+0.662	−4.172
Troy D'Amico	1,321	886	59.9%	−6.228	+0.252	+6.318	+0.758	−5.410	−1.774	−2.338	+2.028	+2.576	−3.58	+1.640
Conor Enright	1,063	1,144	48.2%	+14.394	+9.592	−4.874	+4.992	+6.796	+3.110	+2.868	−1.868	+0.758	+1.474	−3.770
Jacob Meyer	1,006	1,201	45.6%	+1.156	+7.988	+6.716	+0.152	+5.992	−1.064	+3.370	+3.118	−2.626	+1.068	+1.938
NJ Benson	961	1,247	43.5%	+16.696	+13.098	−3.568	+6.196	+7.596	+1.526	+10.494	−3.684	−0.942	−0.936	−0.954
JJ Traynor	951	1,256	43.1%	+0.452	+4.072	+3.630	+1.566	+2.776	−0.964	−5.124	+1.434	−2.130	−0.050	−1.156
David Thomas	612	1,596	27.7%	−8.522	−7.218	+1.342	−2.030	−5.510	−0.150	+3.874	−0.554	−0.942	−1.034	+8.710
David Skogman	513	1,695	23.2%	+1.456	−11.28	−12.696	−5.98	−0.052	+1.824	−7.914	−3.684	+3.986	+2.284	−7.486
Théo Pierre-Justin	182	2,026	8.2%	−14.410	−7.616	+6.816	−2.922	+0.758	+2.416	+1.158	+5.84	+2.172	+1.474	+12.84
Chris Riddle	159	2,048	7.2%	+29.2100	+18.9100	−10.392	+8.7100	+6.694	−1.268	+16.1100	−7.496	+2.474	−3.68	+7.414

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Rivera	1,494	713	67.7%	-3.940	105.842	109.742	52.9%58	27.2%36	18.7%34	26.4%38	51.9%44	68.9%50	16.2%44	28.1%54
CJ Gunn	1,418	789	64.3%	-5.738	105.540	111.238	51.7%52	28.6%42	18.0%40	26.8%40	51.7%44	67.4%42	15.8%40	28.8%52
Layden Blocker	1,357	851	61.5%	-7.434	102.232	109.644	50.0%46	28.5%40	18.4%36	25.4%36	51.7%44	68.6%48	16.0%42	27.1%56
Troy D'Amico	1,321	886	59.9%	-5.038	107.646	112.636	53.0%58	27.8%38	18.0%40	26.7%40	52.3%42	69.4%52	14.4%30	29.3%50
Conor Enright	1,063	1,144	48.2%	4.956	112.558	107.648	55.2%68	33.5%62	20.3%24	29.0%46	50.5%50	68.8%48	16.5%46	26.8%58
Jacob Meyer	1,006	1,201	45.6%	-1.944	111.856	113.732	52.7%56	33.2%58	18.2%38	29.4%48	53.2%38	67.0%42	16.3%44	29.7%48
NJ Benson	961	1,247	43.5%	6.860	114.964	108.148	56.2%72	34.5%64	19.6%28	33.5%60	49.4%56	67.9%44	15.3%36	28.2%54
JJ Traynor	951	1,256	43.1%	-2.344	109.852	112.136	53.5%60	31.6%54	18.2%38	24.7%34	52.3%42	67.2%42	15.8%40	28.1%54
David Thomas	612	1,596	27.7%	-8.732	102.334	111.040	51.2%48	26.0%30	18.6%36	30.4%50	51.1%48	67.8%44	15.0%34	35.1%34
David Skogman	513	1,695	23.2%	-1.544	98.926	100.466	48.2%34	30.0%48	20.1%24	21.6%24	48.7%58	71.4%60	17.5%52	23.0%70
Théo Pierre-Justin	182	2,026	8.2%	-15.722	100.630	116.328	50.0%40	30.7%50	20.9%22	28.6%46	56.9%22	70.3%56	17.1%50	40.5%22
Chris Riddle	159	2,048	7.2%	24.684	125.184	100.566	60.8%86	36.1%70	17.6%42	42.5%78	44.6%76	70.5%56	12.4%18	35.6%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Isaiah Rivera	1,494	713	67.7%	0.348	111.254	110.940	52.3%54	35.7%68	18.6%34	29.9%50	50.6%50	67.5%44	14.8%34	29.8%48
CJ Gunn	1,418	789	64.3%	3.252	111.354	108.148	54.4%64	32.5%56	20.0%26	29.0%46	51.0%48	70.3%56	15.8%40	28.5%52
Layden Blocker	1,357	851	61.5%	5.356	116.166	110.840	57.0%74	32.6%58	19.3%30	31.2%54	51.1%48	68.1%46	15.4%38	31.2%44
Troy D'Amico	1,321	886	59.9%	1.248	107.446	106.352	52.3%54	33.3%58	19.8%28	29.0%46	50.3%50	66.9%42	17.9%56	27.7%54
Conor Enright	1,063	1,144	48.2%	-9.432	103.034	112.336	50.4%46	26.8%34	17.2%44	26.3%38	52.3%42	68.1%46	15.1%36	30.5%46
Jacob Meyer	1,006	1,201	45.6%	-3.042	104.036	107.050	52.7%56	27.2%36	19.1%32	26.1%38	50.0%50	69.6%54	15.3%36	27.8%54
NJ Benson	961	1,247	43.5%	-9.730	101.932	111.638	50.1%46	27.0%34	18.0%40	23.2%28	53.1%38	68.8%50	16.2%44	29.1%50
JJ Traynor	951	1,256	43.1%	-2.742	105.842	108.546	52.0%54	28.9%42	19.1%32	29.9%50	50.9%50	69.3%52	15.8%40	29.2%50
David Thomas	612	1,596	27.7%	-0.246	109.550	109.742	53.2%58	31.5%52	18.7%34	26.6%40	51.6%46	68.6%48	16.1%42	26.3%58
David Skogman	513	1,695	23.2%	-2.942	110.252	113.034	54.1%62	30.0%48	18.3%38	29.5%48	52.3%42	67.5%44	15.3%36	30.4%46
Théo Pierre-Justin	182	2,026	8.2%	-1.344	108.248	109.544	52.9%58	30.0%46	18.5%36	27.5%42	51.0%48	68.2%46	15.7%40	27.7%54
Chris Riddle	159	2,048	7.2%	-4.640	106.242	110.840	52.1%54	29.6%44	18.8%34	26.5%38	52.0%44	68.2%46	16.1%42	28.1%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.