Duquesne24-12

A10Coach: Keith Dambrot

24-12NET#89

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jimmy Clark III	1,658	424	79.6%	+6.574	−0.150	−6.780	+0.758	−1.340	+0.244	+2.766	+2.028	+0.252	+7.5100	−1.356
Dae Dae Grant	1,609	473	77.3%	+6.172	+16.9100	+10.96	+9.2100	−1.142	−3.790	−3.432	+5.28	−3.918	−1.626	−0.752
Kareem Rozier	1,285	797	61.7%	−11.914	−6.620	+5.322	−2.922	−1.142	+1.922	−1.842	+3.220	−2.628	+0.560	−0.450
Fousseyni Drame	1,090	992	52.3%	+13.992	+13.698	−0.350	+2.476	+5.490	−2.986	+6.284	−0.252	+5.090	−2.714	−0.552
David Dixon	1,021	1,061	49.0%	+7.578	+5.376	−2.260	+2.072	+5.892	+2.516	+3.472	−0.858	−2.032	+3.492	+4.426
Jake DiMichele	951	1,131	45.7%	+1.856	−1.642	−3.366	+0.656	−2.430	+0.246	−1.842	−2.272	+1.060	−0.838	+0.246
Tre Williams	521	1,561	25.0%	−9.220	−17.04	−7.884	−4.214	−6.68	+0.738	−5.124	−3.582	+2.272	+1.472	−1.256
Jakub Necas	493	1,589	23.7%	−3.738	+3.268	+6.916	−0.348	+5.792	+0.442	−0.152	−0.152	−1.538	−3.78	+4.426
Andrei Savrasov	492	1,590	23.6%	+0.852	−3.830	−4.674	−1.832	−1.142	+1.626	+8.590	−2.272	−3.322	+2.888	−1.758
Chabi Barre	399	1,683	19.2%	−4.834	−2.338	+2.536	−2.328	−6.88	−3.288	−1.742	−0.656	−2.034	−4.06	−3.166
Dusan Mahorcic	383	1,699	18.4%	−0.448	+1.156	+1.640	+5.894	−6.38	−0.454	−12.06	+4.114	+4.588	−0.348	−7.484
Hassan Drame	224	1,858	10.7%	−6.130	−8.614	−2.462	−7.94	+5.992	+2.318	+7.086	−2.170	+6.696	−1.528	+6.816
Matúš Hronský	214	1,868	10.3%	−17.68	−16.04	+1.640	−7.44	+0.254	+1.230	−8.812	−2.272	−5.710	+0.458	+1.340

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jimmy Clark III	1,658	424	79.6%	4.956	107.446	102.460	50.0%42	34.0%64	18.2%38	32.4%58	49.4%54	66.2%38	21.4%78	34.9%32
Dae Dae Grant	1,609	473	77.3%	4.956	111.256	106.450	51.9%54	34.0%64	17.3%44	31.1%54	50.1%50	65.3%34	19.4%66	35.0%32
Kareem Rozier	1,285	797	61.7%	-1.044	104.940	105.952	48.8%38	33.9%64	18.8%34	31.2%54	50.2%48	65.2%34	20.0%70	35.1%32
Fousseyni Drame	1,090	992	52.3%	10.264	113.962	103.756	51.0%48	36.9%74	16.7%48	34.8%62	48.9%56	68.6%48	18.5%62	34.9%32
David Dixon	1,021	1,061	49.0%	7.460	110.152	102.760	50.9%48	37.3%76	19.4%30	33.6%60	48.5%58	65.1%34	21.5%78	37.5%26
Jake DiMichele	951	1,131	45.7%	4.554	106.644	102.062	50.2%46	33.0%58	18.2%38	30.9%54	47.8%62	66.7%42	19.3%66	35.3%30
Tre Williams	521	1,561	25.0%	-3.440	94.720	98.070	46.7%30	29.5%46	18.6%34	28.0%44	46.3%68	67.8%44	20.8%76	34.2%34
Jakub Necas	493	1,589	23.7%	0.848	109.852	109.044	49.7%42	38.6%80	18.4%36	31.8%56	48.9%56	65.1%34	17.0%50	38.5%24
Andrei Savrasov	492	1,590	23.6%	4.254	104.540	100.366	48.4%38	33.5%62	19.3%30	38.5%70	47.3%64	63.7%28	22.0%80	33.9%34
Chabi Barre	399	1,683	19.2%	-0.346	105.642	105.952	48.0%36	28.8%42	15.5%56	30.5%52	48.5%58	64.6%32	16.5%46	32.7%38
Dusan Mahorcic	383	1,699	18.4%	3.252	108.348	105.154	54.6%66	29.0%42	17.7%40	22.0%28	52.3%40	69.9%54	19.6%68	29.1%48
Hassan Drame	224	1,858	10.7%	-1.942	99.728	101.762	42.8%16	39.5%82	20.1%24	38.1%70	47.1%64	72.1%64	18.4%60	41.3%20
Matúš Hronský	214	1,868	10.3%	-12.228	93.118	105.352	43.3%18	34.5%66	19.2%32	24.0%32	47.0%66	61.2%20	20.2%72	36.4%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jimmy Clark III	1,658	424	79.6%	-1.644	107.546	109.144	49.3%42	35.3%70	17.9%40	29.8%50	47.4%64	66.0%36	13.9%30	36.2%28
Dae Dae Grant	1,609	473	77.3%	-1.244	94.320	95.576	42.8%16	35.2%68	20.9%22	34.5%62	45.0%74	69.1%50	21.0%76	35.7%30
Kareem Rozier	1,285	797	61.7%	10.966	111.556	100.664	51.6%52	35.0%68	16.9%46	33.0%58	47.0%66	67.8%44	19.5%68	35.4%30
Fousseyni Drame	1,090	992	52.3%	-3.740	100.330	104.056	48.6%38	31.4%54	19.6%28	28.6%46	49.0%56	63.6%28	21.2%76	35.5%30
David Dixon	1,021	1,061	49.0%	-0.146	104.840	105.054	48.9%40	31.5%54	16.9%46	30.2%52	49.4%54	67.2%42	18.1%58	33.1%36
Jake DiMichele	951	1,131	45.7%	2.852	108.148	105.352	49.6%42	35.4%70	18.0%38	32.7%58	49.9%54	65.7%36	20.2%72	35.1%32
Tre Williams	521	1,561	25.0%	5.956	111.758	105.852	50.9%48	36.1%72	17.9%40	33.1%58	49.8%54	65.6%36	19.4%66	35.5%30
Jakub Necas	493	1,589	23.7%	4.554	106.644	102.260	49.9%42	32.9%58	18.0%40	31.9%56	49.0%56	66.6%38	20.7%74	34.1%34
Andrei Savrasov	492	1,590	23.6%	3.452	108.348	104.954	50.3%46	34.6%66	17.7%40	29.9%50	49.5%54	67.0%42	19.1%64	35.6%30
Chabi Barre	399	1,683	19.2%	4.554	107.848	103.458	50.3%46	35.6%70	18.7%34	32.2%56	49.1%56	66.6%38	20.5%74	35.8%30
Dusan Mahorcic	383	1,699	18.4%	3.652	107.246	103.658	48.8%40	35.3%70	18.2%38	34.1%62	48.2%60	65.4%36	19.8%70	36.5%28
Hassan Drame	224	1,858	10.7%	4.254	108.348	104.156	50.7%48	33.6%62	17.9%40	31.1%54	49.2%56	65.5%36	20.0%70	34.5%34
Matúš Hronský	214	1,868	10.3%	5.456	109.050	103.758	50.7%48	34.3%64	18.0%40	32.8%58	49.2%56	66.9%42	19.7%68	35.0%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.