Duquesne16-15

A10Coach: Dru Joyce III

16-15NET#131

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tarence Guinyard	1,750	401	81.4%	+11.890	+11.596	−0.252	+3.886	+5.892	−1.776	+3.370	−0.252	+1.970	+0.764	+5.122
Jimmie Williams	1,593	558	74.1%	+17.596	+11.896	−5.780	+4.088	+5.792	−1.268	−3.632	+0.048	+0.456	+2.386	−10.994
Jakub Necas	1,260	891	58.6%	+11.088	+2.464	−8.688	+2.778	+1.566	+1.820	−1.544	−3.280	+5.894	+0.764	−0.352
David Dixon	1,175	976	54.6%	+2.962	+0.354	−2.564	−0.248	+2.172	+0.344	−4.228	+0.740	−2.626	+4.498	+4.326
Cam Crawford	932	1,219	43.3%	+6.876	+6.282	−0.652	+3.484	−1.834	−2.282	−3.134	+0.346	+0.960	−1.130	−6.782
Alex Williams	925	1,226	43.0%	−7.124	+0.354	+7.412	−3.518	−1.438	−3.994	+5.982	+1.830	−5.58	−1.328	−1.158
Brandon Hall	808	1,343	37.6%	+0.152	+0.856	+0.746	−2.030	+4.186	−2.484	−6.418	+2.226	+2.070	+1.474	+5.222
John Hugley IV	706	1,445	32.8%	−10.916	−5.522	+5.420	−0.348	−2.032	+3.28	+4.776	+1.532	+3.382	−5.42	−9.490
Maximus Edwards	576	1,575	26.8%	−3.638	−6.220	−2.664	−1.040	−3.322	+3.010	+4.074	−3.684	−3.718	−0.346	−1.056
Jake DiMichele	573	1,578	26.7%	−17.66	−13.26	+4.424	−5.310	−6.18	+2.018	+5.782	−0.960	−0.544	−2.712	+1.242
Dom Aekins	150	2,002	7.0%	−26.62	−8.114	+18.50	−0.150	−4.216	+1.230	−10.86	+5.28	−8.24	−2.218	+11.74
Stef van Bussel	140	2,011	6.5%	−6.926	−8.114	−1.256	−2.228	−5.012	−0.456	+0.354	−2.474	−5.110	+3.394	+26.10
Lazar Milosevic	135	2,017	6.3%	+6.976	+1.760	−5.278	+6.496	+0.860	+5.02	−5.622	−3.078	+0.960	−0.542	−4.976

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tarence Guinyard	1,750	401	81.4%	2.750	111.352	108.646	53.2%54	31.4%56	17.3%38	38.9%64	52.7%42	70.8%52	18.5%68	41.4%26
Jimmie Williams	1,593	558	74.1%	5.054	112.254	107.250	53.5%56	31.8%58	17.3%38	37.4%60	52.8%42	70.5%52	19.0%70	37.5%34
Jakub Necas	1,260	891	58.6%	5.054	110.148	105.156	53.6%56	30.9%54	18.3%30	37.7%60	51.4%48	72.8%62	18.7%68	40.2%28
David Dixon	1,175	976	54.6%	1.848	109.346	107.550	52.4%50	31.2%54	17.7%34	36.4%58	53.1%40	69.2%46	20.4%78	42.3%24
Cam Crawford	932	1,219	43.3%	4.354	112.654	108.348	54.4%60	29.3%48	16.3%46	36.6%58	52.9%42	70.9%54	17.7%62	36.6%38
Alex Williams	925	1,226	43.0%	-3.640	109.346	112.936	50.5%42	29.5%48	15.4%54	41.7%68	53.8%38	67.3%38	17.6%62	39.7%30
Brandon Hall	808	1,343	37.6%	0.546	109.648	109.046	51.3%44	32.8%62	16.1%48	34.4%54	54.1%36	71.6%58	19.2%72	43.6%22
John Hugley IV	706	1,445	32.8%	-6.934	105.436	112.338	52.3%50	28.9%46	19.7%22	41.5%68	53.7%38	72.6%62	14.7%38	34.2%44
Maximus Edwards	576	1,575	26.8%	-2.242	104.536	106.752	51.8%48	27.8%42	19.8%22	41.3%68	50.1%52	67.7%40	18.2%64	39.6%30
Jake DiMichele	573	1,578	26.7%	-12.426	99.424	111.840	48.5%34	25.8%34	19.0%26	42.6%70	52.1%44	70.0%48	16.4%52	41.2%26
Dom Aekins	150	2,002	7.0%	-24.314	101.628	125.912	52.4%50	26.4%36	18.7%28	28.2%36	57.6%22	62.7%22	16.3%52	51.3%12
Stef van Bussel	140	2,011	6.5%	-6.036	101.528	107.550	50.4%42	25.7%32	17.2%38	38.6%62	50.5%52	65.6%32	21.5%82	64.9%4
Lazar Milosevic	135	2,017	6.3%	6.958	110.750	103.760	58.5%76	31.0%54	22.3%12	33.0%50	50.0%58	71.2%54	17.9%62	35.7%40

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tarence Guinyard	1,750	401	81.4%	-9.130	99.726	108.846	49.4%36	25.5%32	18.9%26	35.6%56	52.9%42	68.8%44	17.8%62	36.2%38
Jimmie Williams	1,593	558	74.1%	-12.526	100.426	112.936	49.5%36	26.1%34	18.5%30	41.0%68	52.7%42	70.1%50	16.7%54	48.4%16
Jakub Necas	1,260	891	58.6%	-6.036	107.742	113.734	50.9%44	29.4%48	16.5%44	39.2%64	54.6%34	67.0%38	18.0%64	40.5%28
David Dixon	1,175	976	54.6%	-1.144	108.946	110.044	52.6%52	29.2%46	17.4%36	40.6%66	52.4%44	71.8%58	15.9%48	38.0%34
Cam Crawford	932	1,219	43.3%	-2.542	106.440	108.946	51.0%44	31.1%54	18.5%30	39.7%64	52.6%42	70.0%48	18.9%70	43.3%22
Alex Williams	925	1,226	43.0%	3.552	109.046	105.554	54.0%58	30.9%54	19.2%24	35.7%56	52.0%46	72.8%62	18.9%70	40.8%28
Brandon Hall	808	1,343	37.6%	0.446	108.846	108.448	53.3%54	28.7%46	18.5%30	40.8%68	52.0%46	69.7%48	17.9%62	38.4%32
John Hugley IV	706	1,445	32.8%	4.052	110.950	106.952	52.6%52	30.9%54	16.5%44	36.8%58	52.3%44	69.3%46	20.1%76	43.5%22
Maximus Edwards	576	1,575	26.8%	1.548	110.850	109.344	52.8%52	31.1%54	16.8%42	37.3%60	53.7%38	71.4%56	18.5%66	40.6%28
Jake DiMichele	573	1,578	26.7%	5.254	112.654	107.450	53.9%58	31.9%58	17.0%40	36.9%58	53.0%40	70.5%52	19.1%72	40.0%30
Dom Aekins	150	2,002	7.0%	2.350	109.748	107.450	52.5%52	30.6%52	17.5%36	39.1%64	52.4%44	70.9%54	18.5%68	39.5%30
Stef van Bussel	140	2,011	6.5%	0.948	109.648	108.746	52.7%52	30.6%52	17.6%36	38.3%62	52.9%42	70.7%52	18.2%64	38.9%32
Lazar Milosevic	135	2,017	6.3%	0.146	109.046	109.046	52.1%50	30.3%52	17.3%38	38.6%62	53.0%40	70.3%50	18.4%66	40.6%28

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.