Fairfield23-13

MAACCoach: Chris Casey

23-13NET#158

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jasper Floyd	1,829	358	83.6%	+20.698	+14.798	−5.978	+3.684	+1.866	−5.998	−2.936	+0.346	+2.170	+3.692	+2.038
Caleb Fields	1,813	374	82.9%	+5.972	−2.240	−8.186	−2.824	+0.456	−2.076	+4.878	−3.984	+1.768	+0.154	−4.572
Jalen Leach	1,537	649	70.3%	+17.996	+10.694	−7.382	+4.188	+0.456	−2.682	+5.580	−2.676	+5.994	−0.150	+0.646
Louis Bleechmore	1,181	1,006	54.0%	−2.242	+3.268	+5.522	+4.892	−6.38	+0.836	+2.968	−0.454	−5.610	−1.922	−7.786
Brycen Goodine	1,128	1,059	51.6%	+4.868	+2.864	−2.060	−1.140	+5.690	+0.736	+3.370	−1.564	−3.222	+3.088	+9.78
Peyton Smith	964	1,223	44.1%	−2.840	−6.222	−3.466	−0.842	−3.820	+1.034	−10.38	−3.682	−2.330	−1.232	−4.874
James Johns Jr.	682	1,505	31.2%	+5.070	−4.228	−9.288	−2.426	−0.448	−0.760	+0.756	−1.868	+3.884	+2.584	+1.242
Birima Seck	465	1,722	21.3%	+3.464	+6.280	+2.834	+4.188	+3.076	−0.250	−3.532	+2.624	+3.582	−1.528	−2.664
Alexis Yetna	454	1,733	20.7%	−0.450	−0.846	−0.552	−3.022	−0.646	−2.482	−0.250	+2.920	+8.9100	−1.034	−0.752
Jack Brown	299	1,888	13.7%	−9.220	−4.130	+5.124	−0.744	+4.084	+3.112	−6.320	+3.814	+2.372	+0.356	+4.128
Matt Curtis	238	1,948	10.9%	−18.06	−3.930	+14.12	−1.634	−0.250	+1.330	+0.454	+4.510	−4.712	−2.914	−0.752
Michael Rogan	217	1,970	9.9%	−25.74	−11.58	+14.22	−2.824	+1.262	+6.80	−0.946	+5.28	−9.04	+0.660	+2.536

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jasper Floyd	1,829	358	83.6%	8.060	112.058	103.956	51.7%54	31.4%52	15.1%60	27.5%42	51.9%42	66.9%42	21.2%76	26.0%58
Caleb Fields	1,813	374	82.9%	5.656	109.250	103.658	50.7%48	31.2%52	15.7%56	28.8%48	51.2%46	66.8%42	20.6%74	24.9%62
Jalen Leach	1,537	649	70.3%	10.064	112.760	102.860	52.4%56	31.2%52	15.3%58	29.6%50	51.1%46	68.3%48	20.5%74	25.8%58
Louis Bleechmore	1,181	1,006	54.0%	3.652	111.056	107.448	53.4%62	28.0%40	16.4%50	29.4%48	51.7%42	64.1%30	19.7%68	22.3%70
Brycen Goodine	1,128	1,059	51.6%	7.058	110.954	103.956	50.6%48	33.8%64	16.4%50	29.5%50	51.2%46	65.0%34	22.0%80	30.5%44
Peyton Smith	964	1,223	44.1%	3.152	106.144	103.058	50.7%48	29.0%42	16.6%48	22.2%28	49.9%54	65.3%34	19.9%70	23.0%68
James Johns Jr.	682	1,505	31.2%	8.060	106.644	98.670	49.5%42	30.8%52	15.5%56	28.4%46	50.6%48	69.2%50	22.2%82	26.5%56
Birima Seck	465	1,722	21.3%	7.360	114.464	107.148	54.4%66	33.5%62	15.9%54	25.2%36	53.9%32	69.3%52	19.4%66	23.6%66
Alexis Yetna	454	1,733	20.7%	4.454	108.950	104.654	48.8%40	30.6%50	14.1%68	27.8%44	54.2%32	73.7%72	19.8%68	25.1%60
Jack Brown	299	1,888	13.7%	-3.340	106.044	109.442	50.6%48	34.5%66	18.7%34	22.5%28	55.2%28	68.5%48	20.8%76	29.2%48
Matt Curtis	238	1,948	10.9%	-11.428	106.144	117.524	49.8%42	30.9%52	17.2%44	28.3%46	55.9%24	62.4%24	18.0%58	25.0%62
Michael Rogan	217	1,970	9.9%	-18.620	99.228	117.724	48.6%38	32.2%56	22.1%16	27.2%42	56.6%22	58.4%14	21.1%76	27.9%52

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jasper Floyd	1,829	358	83.6%	-12.626	97.324	109.942	48.1%36	29.6%46	21.0%22	30.4%52	51.7%44	64.8%32	17.5%54	24.0%66
Caleb Fields	1,813	374	82.9%	-0.346	111.456	111.736	53.5%62	30.8%50	17.7%42	23.9%32	55.2%28	65.2%34	20.4%74	29.4%48
Jalen Leach	1,537	649	70.3%	-8.034	102.134	110.040	48.3%36	30.8%52	17.9%40	24.1%32	53.7%34	62.4%24	20.7%74	25.3%60
Louis Bleechmore	1,181	1,006	54.0%	5.856	107.848	102.062	48.7%38	34.3%64	15.6%56	26.4%40	52.1%40	69.7%54	21.6%78	30.0%46
Brycen Goodine	1,128	1,059	51.6%	2.250	108.148	106.050	51.7%54	28.2%40	15.7%56	26.2%38	52.6%38	68.2%48	19.0%64	20.8%76
Peyton Smith	964	1,223	44.1%	5.956	112.358	106.450	51.5%52	32.7%58	15.6%56	32.5%58	53.5%34	67.6%44	21.1%76	27.8%52
James Johns Jr.	682	1,505	31.2%	3.052	110.954	107.846	51.9%54	31.2%52	16.3%52	27.7%44	52.4%40	65.4%34	19.8%68	25.3%60
Birima Seck	465	1,722	21.3%	3.954	108.248	104.356	50.3%46	30.5%50	16.1%52	28.7%46	51.3%44	65.8%36	20.9%76	26.2%58
Alexis Yetna	454	1,733	20.7%	4.754	109.752	105.054	51.8%54	31.2%52	16.6%48	28.0%44	51.3%46	64.8%32	20.8%74	25.8%58
Jack Brown	299	1,888	13.7%	5.956	110.152	104.256	51.3%50	30.6%50	15.6%56	28.8%48	51.4%44	66.3%38	20.5%74	25.1%60
Matt Curtis	238	1,948	10.9%	6.658	110.052	103.458	51.3%50	31.1%52	15.9%54	27.9%44	51.4%44	67.1%42	20.9%76	25.7%58
Michael Rogan	217	1,970	9.9%	7.158	110.754	103.658	51.4%50	31.0%52	15.4%58	28.0%44	51.4%44	67.4%44	20.5%74	25.4%60

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.