On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,193 | 996 | -4.7— | 104.5— | 109.2— | 50.7%— | 32.1%— | 19.3%— | 27.0%— | 54.5%— | 61.0%— | 24.6%— | 35.7%— |
| DeanA. DeanKrivokapicP. KrivokapicGittensD. GittensPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 117 | 50 | 80.9— | 146.6— | 65.7— | 70.6%— | 53.2%— | 19.7%— | 34.3%— | 28.7%— | 81.9%— | 23.5%— | 54.7%— |
| DeanA. DeanWilcoxD. WilcoxLipscombJ. LipscombPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 111 | 52 | 4.0— | 98.8— | 94.8— | 52.5%— | 29.1%— | 21.6%— | 7.0%— | 44.0%— | 55.9%— | 26.8%— | 26.4%— |
| DeanA. DeanKrivokapicP. KrivokapicAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensPinkneyS. Pinkney | 109 | 53 | -0.8— | 97.3— | 98.1— | 48.9%— | 36.2%— | 24.8%— | 25.0%— | 52.4%— | 63.5%— | 28.3%— | 24.7%— |
| DeanA. DeanGittensD. GittensLipscombJ. LipscombPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 93 | 46 | -20.9— | 112.9— | 133.7— | 56.6%— | 23.1%— | 14.0%— | 22.9%— | 76.2%— | 56.0%— | 28.0%— | 49.2%— |
| DeanA. DeanGittensD. GittensLipscombJ. LipscombSanogoM. SanogoHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 42 | 22 | 19.0— | 115.0— | 95.9— | 55.6%— | 38.1%— | 21.6%— | 27.8%— | 59.7%— | 47.1%— | 38.4%— | 11.1%— |
| DeanA. DeanKrivokapicP. KrivokapicAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensSanogoM. Sanogo | 40 | 15 | -5.6— | 100.1— | 105.7— | 51.4%— | 40.0%— | 25.0%— | 5.4%— | 72.0%— | 75.0%— | 33.5%— | 32.0%— |
| DeanA. DeanAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 35 | 20 | -19.8— | 103.9— | 123.7— | 40.3%— | 30.4%— | 11.5%— | 45.2%— | 64.1%— | 73.3%— | 18.0%— | 25.0%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
