Poss2,101
Net Rtg-9.032
ORtg102.134
DRtg111.138
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,101 | 956 | -9.032 | 102.134 | 111.138 | 49.5%42 | 31.2%52 | 19.3%30 | 27.2%42 | 55.6%26 | 59.8%16 | 24.8%90 | 35.3%32 |
| DeanA. DeanWilcoxD. WilcoxLipscombJ. LipscombPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 111 | 52 | 4.054 | 98.826 | 94.876 | 52.5%56 | 29.1%44 | 21.6%18 | 7.0%2 | 44.0%78 | 55.9%10 | 26.8%94 | 26.4%58 |
| DeanA. DeanKrivokapicP. KrivokapicAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensPinkneyS. Pinkney | 109 | 53 | -0.844 | 97.324 | 98.170 | 48.9%40 | 36.2%72 | 24.8%8 | 25.0%36 | 52.4%40 | 63.5%28 | 28.3%96 | 24.7%62 |
| DeanA. DeanGittensD. GittensLipscombJ. LipscombPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 93 | 46 | -20.918 | 112.960 | 133.76 | 56.6%74 | 23.1%22 | 14.0%68 | 22.9%30 | 76.2%0 | 56.0%10 | 28.0%96 | 49.2%10 |
| DeanA. DeanGittensD. GittensLipscombJ. LipscombSanogoM. SanogoHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 42 | 22 | 19.078 | 115.064 | 95.974 | 55.6%70 | 38.1%78 | 21.6%18 | 27.8%44 | 59.7%14 | 47.1%2 | 38.4%100 | 11.1%94 |
| DeanA. DeanKrivokapicP. KrivokapicAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensSanogoM. Sanogo | 40 | 15 | -5.638 | 100.130 | 105.752 | 51.4%50 | 40.0%82 | 25.0%8 | 5.4%2 | 72.0%0 | 75.0%74 | 33.5%100 | 32.0%40 |
| DeanA. DeanAybarJ. AybarGittensD. GittensPinkneyS. PinkneyHawkinsJ. Hawkins | 35 | 20 | -19.818 | 103.938 | 123.714 | 40.3%12 | 30.4%50 | 11.5%82 | 45.2%82 | 64.1%6 | 73.3%70 | 18.0%58 | 25.0%62 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24 (4,483 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.