Georgetown16-18

Big EastCoach: Ed Cooley

16-18NET#92

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Malik Mack	1,850	419	81.5%	+2.962	+4.576	+1.638	+2.576	−6.08	−2.180	−0.152	−1.564	+0.556	−1.920	+0.348
Caleb Williams	1,659	610	73.1%	−11.614	−1.742	+9.96	−1.832	−2.826	−1.878	−8.512	+5.28	−1.534	−1.526	−3.770
KJ Lewis	1,396	873	61.5%	+7.980	+3.772	−4.272	−0.248	+1.062	−1.878	+5.380	−1.768	−0.248	+1.476	+4.424
Jeremiah Williams	1,120	1,149	49.3%	+1.556	+1.660	+0.150	+1.970	+2.072	+0.540	−4.626	−1.060	−2.428	+0.764	+4.226
Isaiah Abraham	1,084	1,185	47.8%	−3.140	−0.746	+2.334	+1.466	+0.254	+2.018	−8.512	+3.018	+3.282	−2.020	−7.184
Julius Halaifonua	1,048	1,221	46.2%	−6.128	−0.846	+5.320	−0.150	−3.818	−2.686	−0.350	+4.710	+3.786	−0.738	−4.876
Vince Iwuchukwu	921	1,348	40.6%	+13.292	+2.162	−11.194	+1.970	+0.354	+1.132	−0.848	−6.696	−1.930	+1.272	−2.866
Kayvaun Mulready	860	1,409	37.9%	−3.736	−4.526	−0.854	−1.436	+0.758	+2.216	+5.278	−0.252	+0.354	+1.272	+1.740
Jayden Fort	728	1,541	32.1%	+6.976	−0.648	−7.486	−0.248	+5.392	+2.712	+2.466	−4.690	−2.228	+1.070	+0.248
Langston Love	435	1,833	19.2%	−8.022	−1.940	+6.116	−1.040	+0.354	+0.442	+1.158	+3.018	−0.644	−2.414	−4.072
DeShawn Harris-Smith	155	2,114	6.8%	+8.782	+3.268	−5.578	−3.618	+1.466	−4.496	+18.4100	−2.676	+3.584	+6.1100	+16.52

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Malik Mack	1,850	419	81.5%	1.448	109.346	107.948	50.1%42	31.2%54	15.3%54	37.3%60	49.7%58	68.7%44	15.7%46	33.8%44
Caleb Williams	1,659	610	73.1%	-2.342	108.144	110.442	49.1%36	31.7%58	15.2%54	35.2%54	51.4%48	68.1%40	15.7%46	32.7%46
KJ Lewis	1,396	873	61.5%	3.952	109.948	106.054	49.5%36	32.8%62	15.0%56	39.4%64	49.3%58	68.5%42	16.7%54	35.4%40
Jeremiah Williams	1,120	1,149	49.3%	1.648	109.346	107.750	50.5%42	33.4%66	16.0%48	35.1%54	49.5%58	67.4%38	16.4%52	35.8%40
Isaiah Abraham	1,084	1,185	47.8%	-0.744	108.144	108.846	50.3%42	32.5%60	16.8%42	32.9%50	51.5%48	70.2%50	15.1%42	30.0%54
Julius Halaifonua	1,048	1,221	46.2%	-2.442	108.144	110.542	49.6%36	30.3%52	14.3%62	37.2%60	52.5%42	70.6%52	15.7%46	31.1%52
Vince Iwuchukwu	921	1,348	40.6%	8.860	109.748	101.066	50.7%42	32.5%60	16.4%44	36.9%60	46.1%72	67.5%38	16.8%56	32.0%50
Kayvaun Mulready	860	1,409	37.9%	-1.442	105.738	107.150	48.7%34	32.8%62	17.1%38	40.7%68	49.9%58	68.8%44	16.9%56	34.7%42
Jayden Fort	728	1,541	32.1%	5.454	108.144	102.762	49.4%36	36.0%72	17.6%36	39.0%64	46.9%68	67.1%38	16.8%56	33.8%44
Langston Love	435	1,833	19.2%	-5.536	107.040	112.538	48.8%34	32.6%60	16.1%48	38.3%62	52.4%44	68.1%40	14.2%34	30.5%54
DeShawn Harris-Smith	155	2,114	6.8%	9.062	111.552	102.562	46.2%24	33.7%66	11.6%80	54.5%86	47.5%66	71.8%58	21.7%84	49.2%14

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Malik Mack	1,850	419	81.5%	-1.542	104.936	106.452	47.5%28	37.3%76	17.4%36	37.5%60	51.2%50	68.1%40	17.6%62	33.4%44
Caleb Williams	1,659	610	73.1%	9.262	109.848	100.566	50.9%44	34.4%68	17.1%40	43.7%72	46.2%72	69.7%48	17.2%58	36.3%38
KJ Lewis	1,396	873	61.5%	-3.938	106.238	110.244	49.7%36	31.7%58	16.8%40	34.1%52	51.0%50	68.7%44	15.2%44	31.0%52
Jeremiah Williams	1,120	1,149	49.3%	0.246	107.742	107.550	48.7%34	31.4%56	15.5%52	39.7%66	50.5%52	69.7%48	15.8%48	31.6%50
Isaiah Abraham	1,084	1,185	47.8%	2.450	108.946	106.552	48.9%34	32.3%60	14.8%58	41.4%68	48.5%62	67.0%38	17.1%58	37.2%36
Julius Halaifonua	1,048	1,221	46.2%	3.752	108.946	105.254	49.6%36	34.1%66	17.0%40	37.5%60	47.9%64	66.9%38	16.4%52	35.9%40
Vince Iwuchukwu	921	1,348	40.6%	-4.438	107.742	112.138	48.8%34	32.3%60	15.3%54	37.7%60	52.7%42	69.4%46	15.6%46	34.8%42
Kayvaun Mulready	860	1,409	37.9%	2.350	110.248	107.948	50.1%42	32.1%60	14.9%56	35.4%56	50.0%52	68.4%42	15.6%46	33.1%46
Jayden Fort	728	1,541	32.1%	-1.442	108.744	110.144	49.7%36	30.7%52	14.9%58	36.6%58	51.5%48	69.3%46	15.8%48	33.6%44
Langston Love	435	1,833	19.2%	2.450	108.946	106.452	49.8%36	32.3%60	15.7%50	37.2%60	49.4%58	68.7%44	16.6%54	34.5%42
DeShawn Harris-Smith	155	2,114	6.8%	0.346	108.344	108.048	49.8%36	32.3%60	16.0%48	36.1%58	50.1%52	68.3%42	15.7%46	32.7%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.