Grambling St.9-22

SWACCoach: Donte Jackson

9-22NET#314

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mikale Stevenson	1,405	448	75.8%	−13.712	−7.416	+6.218	−1.832	−4.116	+3.110	+1.562	+5.56	−1.536	+2.486	+5.222
Kintavious Dozier	1,377	476	74.3%	+9.384	+9.792	+0.446	+1.568	+6.694	−3.390	+0.756	+2.424	+1.364	+1.170	−3.568
Antwan Burnett	1,148	705	61.9%	−0.050	−4.130	−4.172	−2.030	+0.152	+2.020	+2.366	−1.464	−1.042	−0.248	−11.194
PJ Eason	1,045	809	56.4%	+5.170	−2.736	−7.886	−3.816	+4.888	−0.658	−5.522	−2.272	+2.272	+1.778	−2.966
Ernest Ross	903	950	48.7%	−4.036	+5.078	+9.010	+4.590	+0.758	+2.614	+4.878	+4.212	−0.744	−2.020	+0.248
Cbo Newton	796	1,058	42.9%	−2.142	+3.570	+5.620	+2.274	−5.98	−3.692	−1.742	+3.714	−3.320	+2.384	+0.148
James Flippin	795	1,058	42.9%	+0.652	−2.140	−2.764	+2.374	−5.98	+0.344	−5.124	−3.080	−3.520	+0.560	−1.256
P.J. Edwards	748	1,105	40.4%	−4.236	−9.510	−5.478	−3.518	−0.150	+2.912	+1.058	−2.978	+4.690	−1.230	−0.954
Lou Hutchinson	523	1,330	28.2%	−5.032	−2.140	+2.934	−3.816	−0.744	−1.572	+4.778	−3.080	−3.122	−1.626	+10.46
Emeka Nnaji	198	1,655	10.7%	−0.350	+8.388	+8.510	+4.290	+3.782	−0.760	+2.868	+6.72	+4.590	−1.822	−0.654
Emareyon McDonald	118	1,735	6.4%	+11.488	+8.188	−3.368	+4.692	−3.224	−5.898	−12.84	−7.998	+3.280	−5.22	+19.20
Dupree Fletcher	115	1,738	6.2%	+39.0100	+20.3100	−18.798	+3.180	+17.4100	−1.674	+9.492	−8.898	+10.7100	+0.764	+8.212

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mikale Stevenson	1,405	448	75.8%	-9.032	96.622	105.654	46.7%28	28.4%40	20.6%22	33.6%60	50.4%50	67.2%42	19.6%68	31.6%42
Kintavious Dozier	1,377	476	74.3%	-3.342	100.930	104.256	47.5%32	31.1%52	19.0%32	33.4%60	49.7%56	68.0%46	19.3%66	29.4%50
Antwan Burnett	1,148	705	61.9%	-5.738	96.922	102.660	46.4%28	29.5%44	20.6%22	34.1%62	48.6%60	67.3%42	19.0%64	26.3%58
PJ Eason	1,045	809	56.4%	-3.542	97.324	100.866	45.5%24	31.4%52	19.5%28	30.9%52	48.1%62	68.6%48	19.8%68	29.0%50
Ernest Ross	903	950	48.7%	-7.734	101.030	108.746	49.5%40	29.9%46	21.2%20	35.7%66	51.2%48	67.3%42	18.0%56	30.4%46
Cbo Newton	796	1,058	42.9%	-6.934	100.430	107.448	48.4%34	26.1%30	17.7%42	32.2%56	51.2%48	65.6%36	20.4%72	30.4%46
James Flippin	795	1,058	42.9%	-5.338	97.222	102.662	48.5%36	25.9%30	20.0%26	30.2%50	47.3%66	65.6%36	19.4%66	29.6%48
P.J. Edwards	748	1,105	40.4%	-8.232	92.716	101.066	45.0%22	29.4%44	21.5%18	33.8%60	47.4%66	70.3%56	18.4%60	29.8%48
Lou Hutchinson	523	1,330	28.2%	-9.332	96.922	106.252	44.4%20	29.0%42	18.7%34	36.6%68	46.9%66	65.4%36	17.9%56	37.9%28
Emeka Nnaji	198	1,655	10.7%	-5.936	105.842	111.738	50.9%46	32.7%58	19.1%32	35.7%66	55.1%30	71.7%62	17.4%52	29.8%48
Emareyon McDonald	118	1,735	6.4%	5.056	106.042	101.066	51.4%50	26.5%32	14.4%66	21.3%24	41.6%86	70.6%58	14.2%30	48.4%12
Dupree Fletcher	115	1,738	6.2%	30.990	117.570	86.688	50.0%40	45.7%94	18.3%38	41.9%78	40.8%86	77.6%84	19.7%68	38.0%28

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Mikale Stevenson	1,405	448	75.8%	4.756	104.138	99.468	48.5%36	32.5%56	17.4%44	32.1%56	44.9%74	68.7%48	17.3%52	26.4%58
Kintavious Dozier	1,377	476	74.3%	-12.626	91.214	103.858	46.0%26	24.5%26	22.3%14	32.6%58	47.3%66	66.7%38	18.3%58	32.9%40
Antwan Burnett	1,148	705	61.9%	-5.738	100.930	106.650	48.4%34	29.4%44	18.6%36	31.8%54	49.9%54	68.2%46	19.2%64	37.4%28
PJ Eason	1,045	809	56.4%	-8.632	99.928	108.646	49.4%40	26.7%32	20.2%24	36.4%68	50.3%50	66.4%38	18.1%58	32.0%42
Ernest Ross	903	950	48.7%	-3.740	96.020	99.768	45.0%22	29.1%44	18.5%36	30.9%52	47.0%66	67.9%46	20.1%70	30.2%46
Cbo Newton	796	1,058	42.9%	-4.840	96.922	101.764	46.2%26	31.9%54	21.4%20	33.9%60	47.5%64	69.0%50	18.1%58	30.3%46
James Flippin	795	1,058	42.9%	-5.936	99.328	105.254	46.2%26	31.8%54	19.7%28	35.3%64	50.3%50	69.1%50	18.9%62	30.8%44
P.J. Edwards	748	1,105	40.4%	-4.040	102.334	106.352	48.5%36	29.5%44	18.6%34	32.8%58	50.2%50	65.7%36	19.6%68	30.7%46
Lou Hutchinson	523	1,330	28.2%	-4.340	99.026	103.358	48.2%34	29.7%46	20.2%24	31.9%56	49.9%54	68.5%48	19.5%66	27.4%56
Emeka Nnaji	198	1,655	10.7%	-5.638	97.524	103.260	46.7%28	29.1%44	19.9%26	32.9%58	48.3%60	67.2%42	19.3%66	30.4%46
Emareyon McDonald	118	1,735	6.4%	-6.436	97.924	104.356	46.8%28	29.7%46	20.2%24	34.1%62	49.5%56	67.4%42	19.4%66	29.2%50
Dupree Fletcher	115	1,738	6.2%	-8.134	97.222	105.354	46.9%28	28.3%40	19.9%26	32.5%58	49.5%56	66.9%42	19.0%64	29.8%48

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.