Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Harvard logoHarvard logoHarvard logoHarvard logo

Harvard20-8

IvyCoach: Tommy Amaker

20-8NET#109
Schedule
WLNortheastern logoNortheastern logoWMaine logoMaine logoWSiena logoSiena logoLBuffalo logoBuffalo logoWHoly Cross logoHoly Cross logoWTexas A&M logoTexas A&M logoLMaryland logoMaryland logoLUSC logoUSC logoWMassachusetts logoMassachusetts logoWGeorge Washington logoGeorge Washington logoWHoward logoHoward logoWCalifornia logoCalifornia logoWSan Francisco logoSan Francisco logoWUC Irvine logoUC Irvine logoWDartmouth logoDartmouth logoWDartmouth logoDartmouth logoLPenn logoPenn logoLPrinceton logoPrinceton logoWYale logoYale logoLBrown logoBrown logoWCornell logoCornell logoWColumbia logoColumbia logoWPrinceton logoPrinceton logoWPenn logoPenn logoWColumbia logoColumbia logoWCornell logoCornell logoLBrown logoBrown logoWYale logoYale logo

Team Stats

28 games
  • Net Rating7.477
  • Offensive Rating116.984
  • Defensive Rating109.440
  • Pace62.026
  • Effective FG%51.2%72
  • Off Rebound Pct30.0%70
  • Turnover Pct22.0%23
  • FT Attempt Rate32.6%50

Team Stats

28 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating7.477
  • Offensive Rating116.984
  • Defensive Rating109.440
  • Pace62.026
  • Effective FG%51.2%72
  • Off Rebound Pct30.0%70
  • Turnover Pct22.0%23
  • FT Attempt Rate32.6%50

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct71.4%89
  • Point Margin / Game4.676
  • Points / Game72.569
  • Points Allowed / Game67.966
  • 1st Half Margin1.666
  • 2nd Half Margin3.085
  • Avg Largest Lead11.966
  • Avg Largest Deficit7.683

Box Score

  • Points / Game72.569
  • Rebounds / Game38.287
  • Assists / Game11.828
  • ORebs / Game10.568
  • DRebs / Game27.793
  • Steals / Game6.249
  • Blocks / Game5.297
  • Turnovers / Game13.735
  • PFs / Game17.454

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game26.075
  • FGAs / Game57.958
  • Field Goal Pct45.0%76
  • 2PMs / Game18.872
  • 2PAs / Game35.952
  • 2-Point Pct52.4%84
  • 3PMs / Game7.250
  • 3PAs / Game22.058
  • 3-Point Pct32.8%45
  • FTMs / Game13.250
  • FTAs / Game18.953
  • Free Throw Pct70.1%41

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.9%63
  • % Pts from 3s29.9%45
  • % Pts from FTs18.2%40
  • Paint Pts / Game26.795
  • % Pts in Paint36.8%92
  • Fast Break Pts / Game7.071
  • % Pts on Fast Break9.7%67
  • Points off TOVs / Game12.362
  • % Pts off TOVs16.9%50
  • 1st Half Pts / Game33.559
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.256

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.8%68
  • Points / Shot1.2565
  • 3-Point Att Rate38.0%54
  • Assist Pct45.3%13
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.037
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.86x24
  • PF Drawn / Game18.874

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%47.3%78
  • Opp True Shooting %51.2%80
  • Opp Field Goal Pct41.3%80
  • Opp 2-Point Pct45.5%88
  • Opp 3-Point Pct33.7%41
  • Opp 3PA Rate35.3%69
  • Opp FT Att Rate31.4%55
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1777

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game67.966
  • Paint Pts Allowed22.629
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.773
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.658
  • Opp Assist Pct44.2%91
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.333

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct75.0%86
  • Turnovers Forced Pct19.9%47
  • Steal Pct10.0%56
  • Block Pct8.3%97
  • Hakeem Pct18.4%91
  • PF Efficiency0.93x77
  • Steals / PF0.36x54
  • Blocks / PF0.30x96

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 298 D-I teams
  • #32Paint Pts %45.9%
  • #48REB Diff+127
  • #52Opp OREB%25.0%
  • #55PO TOV Diff+19
  • #79Opp eFG%47.3%
  • #90Adj DRtg98.2
  • #95Pts Diff+129
  • #101eFG%51.2%
Where they rank bestof 298 D-I teams
  • #32Paint Pts %45.9%
  • #48REB Diff+127
  • #52Opp OREB%25.0%
  • #55PO TOV Diff+19
  • #79Opp eFG%47.3%
  • #90Adj DRtg98.2
  • #95Pts Diff+129
  • #101eFG%51.2%
Where they rank worstof 298 D-I teams
  • #308AST%45.3%
  • #257Opp TOV%17.7%
  • #215TOV%19.6%
  • #210Opp 3P%33.7%
  • #1963P%32.8%
  • #183SOS-1.0
  • #175FTAR32.6%
  • #1543PM Diff+8

Most Similar Seasons

to 2019-20
Find Similar
  1. 1Middle Tennessee logoMiddle Tennessee logoMiddle Tennessee 2024-2520-12C-USA95
  2. 2North Texas logoNorth Texas logoNorth Texas 2017-1818-18C-USA94
  3. 3Quinnipiac logoQuinnipiac logoQuinnipiac 2022-2319-12MAAC91
  4. 4Valparaiso logoValparaiso logoValparaiso 2016-1723-8Horizon90
  5. 5Florida Atlantic logoFlorida Atlantic logoFlorida Atlantic 2025-2616-15American90
  6. 6Cincinnati logoCincinnati logoCincinnati 2020-2112-11American89
  7. 7Yale logoYale logoYale 2016-1717-11Ivy89
  8. 8Georgia Tech logoGeorgia Tech logoGeorgia Tech 2024-2517-17ACC89
  9. 9Wichita St. logoWichita St. logoWichita St. 2022-2317-15American89
  10. 10Santa Clara logoSanta Clara logoSanta Clara 2023-2419-13WCC88
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Danilo Djuricic headshotDaniloDjuricicJrRBRobertBakerSrCLChrisLewisSrChristian Juzang headshotChristianJuzangSrRHRioHaskettJrNKNoahKirkwoodSoJustin Bassey headshotJustinBasseySrChris Ledlum headshotChrisLedlumFrBryce Aiken headshotBryceAikenSr
HWHenryWelshSr
RFReedFarleyJr
MFMasonForbesSo
SFSpencerFreedmanSo
Kale Catchings headshotKaleCatchingsSoCBCiaranBrayboyFrIdan Tretout headshotIdanTretoutFrLuka Sakota headshotLukaSakotaFr
TOTommyO'NeilFr
D. DjuricicJr6'8"+0.981––58.6%7415.7%336.14.30.735.4%84.8%
R. BakerSr6'11"+0.569––58.3%7316.5%397.05.30.835.2%83.3%
C. LewisSr6'9"+0.568––61.2%8221.5%7311.45.90.80.0%67.1%
C. JuzangSr6'2"+0.050––48.5%2717.1%446.82.52.827.8%78.4%
R. HaskettJr6'3"+0.050––55.0%5818.7%556.21.40.937.8%75.9%
N. KirkwoodSo6'7"-0.239––53.5%5023.9%8512.13.72.337.3%61.4%
J. BasseySr6'5"-0.336––51.1%3815.1%296.45.51.727.5%71.4%
C. LedlumFr6'6"-0.527––49.7%3128.2%957.33.80.727.3%60.9%
B. AikenSr6'0"-0.624––57.3%6935.1%9916.71.91.736.1%87.2%
H. WelshSr6'10"–––40.0%118.4%50.60.70.10.0%0.0%
R. FarleyJr6'4"–––0.0%19.8%70.00.00.00.0%0.0%
M. ForbesSo6'8"–––63.3%8717.1%443.62.10.40.0%58.3%
S. FreedmanSo6'0"––––0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
K. CatchingsSo6'6"–––34.2%718.6%551.50.50.516.7%25.0%
C. BrayboyFr6'9"–––75.5%9524.5%870.80.70.20.0%75.0%
I. TretoutFr6'4"–––55.5%6125.6%893.80.70.828.6%76.5%
L. SakotaFr6'5"–––56.2%6417.8%492.10.60.533.3%75.0%
T. O'NeilFr6'8"–––107.1%986.5%30.70.90.1100.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Harvard logoHarvard logo25-2617-12#1451.960107.538105.676-3.144+1245+206326.9%14+14853.2%7134.6%5979.9%100
Harvard logoHarvard logo24-2512-15#248-6.232102.523108.846-2.553-9312-14825.1%11+64250.8%4332.2%2376.7%90
Harvard logoHarvard logo23-2414-13#223-4.039102.832106.950-0.960-5521-312226.8%27+302450.5%4233.6%4370.2%27
Harvard logoHarvard logo22-2314-14#1411.659102.329100.779-1.652+11387-172831.0%69+252849.7%3330.9%766.9%11
Harvard logoHarvard logo21-2213-13#214-3.63998.821102.462-4.926-940+135925.4%22-718950.4%5133.2%3969.2%25
Harvard logoHarvard logo19-2021-8#1095.168103.75698.676-1.650+14388+146030.4%68+292351.6%7032.9%4170.1%41
Harvard logoHarvard logo18-1919-12#1254.263105.251101.0731.771+14088+327128.9%51+111353.6%8136.0%7272.1%64
Harvard logoHarvard logo17-1818-14#1431.255101.12399.984-1.255+8375+246626.6%27+401950.3%3735.3%5577.5%96
Harvard logoHarvard logo16-1718-10#1153.265104.553101.371-2.540+4562+619129.9%55+143852.0%6735.5%5774.3%86
Harvard logoHarvard logo15-1612-16#159-0.75099.523100.375-0.357+9279+347730.7%58+90451.2%6438.7%9559.6%0
Harvard logoHarvard logo14-151320-8#847.978103.25395.4880.363+9879-183432.9%67-347348.1%3535.4%6472.0%77
Harvard logoHarvard logo13-141226-5#3015.991112.08496.194-0.555+8872+206332.8%61-949451.9%7638.4%8972.3%75

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.3%#110
Effective FG %
51.2%#100
3-Point %
32.8%#195
3PAR
38.0%#163
FTAR
32.6%#175
Assist %
45.3%#308

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
41.5%#39
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
19.3%#34
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

18 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.5% of shots at 0.81 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9344.5%0.81Middle (11–20s): 34.7% of shots at 1.17 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0734.7%1.17Late (21s+): 20.7% of shots at 1.13 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0020.7%1.13SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0054D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.811844.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.177934.7% of shots
Late 21s+1.138420.7% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.5% of shots at 0.71 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9343.5%0.71Middle (11–20s): 31.8% of shots at 1.15 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0731.8%1.15Late (21s+): 24.7% of shots at 1.05 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0124.7%1.05SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9386Allowed, D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.719443.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.152431.8% of shots
Late 21s+1.053524.7% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.