Poss1,667
Net Rtg-6.836
ORtg101.532
DRtg108.346
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,667 | 825 | -6.836 | 101.532 | 108.346 | 50.3%46 | 25.2%28 | 17.9%40 | 23.9%30 | 52.3%42 | 69.4%52 | 17.3%52 | 24.5%64 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonLesmondL. Lesmond | 473 | 250 | -2.842 | 102.934 | 105.754 | 52.1%54 | 24.4%26 | 18.0%40 | 21.1%24 | 52.4%40 | 71.4%60 | 16.8%46 | 13.5%92 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonBarbourT. Barbour | 79 | 34 | -18.820 | 101.732 | 120.520 | 50.7%46 | 17.9%10 | 14.0%70 | 17.4%14 | 54.0%34 | 64.9%34 | 15.4%38 | 38.7%26 |
| HintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonHuntA. HuntLesmondL. Lesmond | 62 | 29 | -47.94 | 80.36 | 128.210 | 40.6%12 | 23.5%22 | 20.9%22 | 17.0%14 | 68.2%2 | 70.8%60 | 18.5%60 | 18.2%82 |
| Ace-NasteskiL. Ace-NasteskiBatties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. Nelson | 61 | 34 | -10.830 | 91.314 | 102.162 | 44.6%22 | 23.5%22 | 16.3%52 | 12.5%8 | 50.0%54 | 60.6%20 | 25.1%90 | 25.9%60 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonNelsonE. NelsonHuntA. HuntLesmondL. Lesmond | 57 | 24 | 2.552 | 126.486 | 123.914 | 64.3%94 | 14.3%6 | 14.0%68 | 50.0%86 | 66.7%4 | 85.0%96 | 12.9%22 | 40.5%22 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonBarbourT. BarbourHuntA. Hunt | 53 | 26 | 11.366 | 109.852 | 98.570 | 62.2%90 | 20.0%14 | 22.7%14 | 19.5%20 | 46.7%68 | 78.6%88 | 13.8%26 | 22.2%72 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeHuntA. HuntLesmondL. Lesmond | 53 | 24 | 22.582 | 129.188 | 106.650 | 57.1%76 | 14.3%6 | 9.5%90 | 94.3%100 | 59.8%14 | 70.8%60 | 22.8%84 | 27.5%56 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonHuntA. Hunt | 49 | 25 | -16.722 | 106.944 | 123.616 | 41.5%14 | 46.9%94 | 20.6%22 | 29.8%50 | 58.1%18 | 72.7%66 | 11.0%12 | 16.3%86 |
| HintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonBarbourT. BarbourLesmondL. Lesmond | 35 | 15 | -65.62 | 73.34 | 138.92 | 34.7%4 | 31.8%54 | 16.9%48 | 2.8%2 | 76.9%0 | 77.8%84 | 19.8%68 | 34.6%36 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIHintonR. HintonPiggeC. PiggeBarbourT. BarbourEisendrathB. Eisendrath | 34 | 17 | -10.230 | 91.714 | 101.962 | 37.5%6 | 40.9%84 | 20.7%22 | 25.0%34 | 51.8%44 | 58.8%16 | 26.3%94 | 10.7%94 |
| Batties IIIT. Batties IIIPiggeC. PiggeNelsonE. NelsonHuntA. HuntLesmondL. Lesmond | 33 | 15 | -44.34 | 84.08 | 128.310 | 46.0%26 | 25.0%26 | 27.0%4 | 28.0%44 | 68.2%2 | 66.7%38 | 19.2%64 | 59.1%6 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

