Schedule
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
WL
LL
WWLLL
WWWWWLWLLWWWLLWLWLWLWWWWLLLWWLLLTeam Stats
33 games- Net Rating9.786
- Offensive Rating121.779
- Defensive Rating112.147
- Pace56.827
- Effective FG%47.6%34
- Off Rebound Pct30.2%45
- Turnover Pct17.5%91
- FT Attempt Rate31.2%11
Team Stats
33 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating9.786
- Offensive Rating121.779
- Defensive Rating112.147
- Pace56.827
- Effective FG%47.6%34
- Off Rebound Pct30.2%45
- Turnover Pct17.5%91
- FT Attempt Rate31.2%11
Results & Margin
- Win Pct57.6%67
- Point Margin / Game5.584
- Points / Game69.170
- Points Allowed / Game63.675
- 1st Half Margin3.381
- 2nd Half Margin2.279
- Avg Largest Lead––
- Avg Largest Deficit––
Box Score
- Points / Game69.170
- Rebounds / Game34.458
- Assists / Game11.837
- ORebs / Game10.653
- DRebs / Game23.758
- Steals / Game6.357
- Blocks / Game3.244
- Turnovers / Game9.997
- PFs / Game17.569
Shooting
- FGMs / Game23.861
- FGAs / Game57.788
- Field Goal Pct41.3%26
- 2PMs / Game16.642
- 2PAs / Game37.469
- 2-Point Pct44.4%14
- 3PMs / Game7.277
- 3PAs / Game20.378
- 3-Point Pct35.5%68
- FTMs / Game14.360
- FTAs / Game18.021
- Free Throw Pct79.4%100
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s48.0%26
- % Pts from 3s31.3%73
- % Pts from FTs20.6%51
- Paint Pts / Game5.56
- % Pts in Paint8.0%6
- Fast Break Pts / Game0.87
- % Pts on Fast Break1.2%7
- Points off TOVs / Game7.729
- % Pts off TOVs11.1%25
- 1st Half Pts / Game32.269
- 2nd Half Pts / Game36.369
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %52.7%46
- Points / Shot1.2032
- 3-Point Att Rate35.2%58
- Assist Pct49.5%28
- Assists / 100 Poss20.847
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.19x82
- PF Drawn / Game16.611
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%48.0%65
- Opp True Shooting %51.9%69
- Opp Field Goal Pct42.1%69
- Opp 2-Point Pct47.3%57
- Opp 3-Point Pct32.9%73
- Opp 3PA Rate36.0%33
- Opp FT Att Rate30.4%89
- Opp Points / Shot1.1879
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game63.675
- Paint Pts Allowed7.686
- Fast Break Pts Allowed0.793
- Pts off TOVs Allowed4.389
- Opp Assist Pct51.3%65
- TOVs Forced / Game12.963
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct72.0%88
- Turnovers Forced Pct22.7%74
- Steal Pct11.1%67
- Block Pct5.6%46
- Hakeem Pct16.7%61
- PF Efficiency1.05x32
- Steals / PF0.36x66
- Blocks / PF0.18x49
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #8TOV%15.3%
- #43Opp OREB%28.0%
- #56Adj DRtg95.9
- #59Adj ORtg108.6
- #62SOS7.3
- #62Pts Diff+181
- #93Opp 3P%32.9%
- #943PM Diff+27
Where they rank bestof 351 D-I teams
- #8TOV%15.3%
- #43Opp OREB%28.0%
- #56Adj DRtg95.9
- #59Adj ORtg108.6
- #62SOS7.3
- #62Pts Diff+181
- #93Opp 3P%32.9%
- #943PM Diff+27
Where they rank worstof 351 D-I teams
- #314FTAR31.2%
- #252AST%49.5%
- #231eFG%47.6%
- #193OREB%30.2%
- #185TS%52.2%
- #148REB Diff+19
- #128Opp TOV%19.8%
- #122Opp eFG%48.0%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2014-15- 1Northwestern 2021-2214-16Big 10Most alike in 3PA rate, Opp TOV%, FT rate93
- 2
Butler 2017-1821-14Big EastMost alike in OREB%, Tempo, Opp TOV%90 - 3
Oklahoma 2020-2116-11Big 12Most alike in Opp eFG%, Adj D, OREB%89 - 4Oregon 2023-2424-12Pac 12Most alike in Opp TOV%, OREB%, Adj O86
- 5Miami FL 2017-1822-10ACCMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, FT rate85
- 6Butler 2023-2417-15Big EastMost alike in Adj O, 3PA rate, FT rate85
- 7
Boston CollegeBC 2023-2420-16ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, Adj O, Opp OREB%85 - 8
Stanford 2024-2521-14ACCMost alike in Adj O, Opp eFG%, Opp TOV%84 - 9
Cincinnati 2022-2322-13AmericanMost alike in FT rate, Adj D, 3PA rate83 - 10
San FranciscoUSF 2018-1919-10WCCMost alike in Opp OREB%, TOV%, Opp eFG%83
Schedule
Loading the schedule
RRRayvonteRiceSrMHMalcolmHillSo
KendrickNunnSo
KendrickNunnSoJTJaylonTateSo
NENnannaEgwuSrASAhmadStarksSrACAaronCosbyJrMLMikeLaTulipJrMMMaverickMorganSoRSRyanSchmidtN/A
LBLeronBlackFrCLCameronLissFr
ACAustinColbertSo
| R. RiceRayvonte Rice | Sr | 6'4" | +2.699 | – | – | 60.7%84 | 25.6%90 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 43.6% | 80.7% |
| M. HillMalcolm Hill | So | 6'6" | +1.187 | – | – | 56.5%70 | 24.4%87 | 14.4 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 38.9% | 78.1% |
| K. NunnKendrick Nunn | So | 6'3" | +0.882 | – | – | 51.6%47 | 20.2%65 | 11.1 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 36.0% | 81.7% |
| J. TateJaylon Tate | So | 6'3" | +0.880 | – | – | 54.3%60 | 14.5%26 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 8.3% | 84.3% |
| N. EgwuNnanna Egwu | Sr | 6'11" | +0.776 | – | – | 49.4%35 | 14.3%24 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 30.3% | 78.6% |
| A. StarksAhmad Starks | Sr | 5'9" | +0.467 | – | – | 45.8%23 | 20.3%66 | 7.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 32.7% | 83.3% |
| A. CosbyAaron Cosby | Jr | 6'3" | -0.241 | – | – | 43.5%18 | 20.6%68 | 7.8 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 31.1% | 80.0% |
| M. LaTulipMike LaTulip | Jr | 6'1" | – | – | – | 74.7%96 | 19.9%63 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 44.4% | 100.0% |
| M. MorganMaverick Morgan | So | 6'10" | – | – | – | 51.9%48 | 17.9%49 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 82.6% |
| R. SchmidtRyan Schmidt | N/A | - | – | – | – | – | 0.0%1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| L. BlackLeron Black | Fr | 6'7" | – | – | – | 51.1%44 | 20.5%67 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 0.1 | 0.0% | 68.2% |
| C. LissCameron Liss | Fr | 6'6" | – | – | – | 56.8%71 | 7.3%4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| A. ColbertAustin Colbert | So | 6'9" | – | – | – | 55.5%65 | 14.1%23 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 75.0% | 61.5% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
  25-263 | 28-9 | #4 | 31.899 | 131.0100 | 99.394 | 13.397 | +38198 | +7588 | 39.3%99 | +3924 | 54.7%84 | 34.5%57 | 78.0%96 |
| 24-256 | 22-13 | #15 | 23.196 | 121.996 | 98.891 | 13.796 | +31899 | +9494 | 35.8%91 | +947 | 52.4%68 | 31.3%12 | 76.2%88 |
| 23-243 | 29-9 | #12 | 22.397 | 124.199 | 101.879 | 10.696 | +29597 | +8493 | 35.6%94 | +7013 | 53.6%83 | 34.9%64 | 73.6%72 |
| 22-239 | 20-13 | #33 | 15.191 | 110.879 | 95.794 | 7.587 | +13387 | +5485 | 31.6%74 | -348 | 51.4%55 | 30.8%6 | 67.9%14 |
| 21-224 | 23-10 | #16 | 19.095 | 114.994 | 95.991 | 10.197 | +18192 | +10898 | 33.1%87 | +5716 | 52.5%76 | 35.9%83 | 70.6%41 |
| 19-20 | 21-10 | #30 | 15.491 | 111.693 | 96.284 | 8.391 | +23397 | -2530 | 35.8%97 | +1634 | 49.1%38 | 30.9%15 | 72.8%68 |
| 18-19 | 12-21 | #95 | 6.172 | 108.470 | 102.367 | 11.496 | -11711 | +4578 | 29.0%52 | -8188 | 49.6%29 | 34.5%52 | 70.2%45 |
| 17-18 | 14-18 | #96 | 6.573 | 111.678 | 105.256 | 7.183 | -1041 | +3674 | 34.2%91 | -11696 | 50.0%33 | 33.5%27 | 73.2%70 |
| 16-17 | 20-15 | #74 | 9.180 | 107.367 | 98.285 | 9.089 | +3959 | +1962 | 28.4%38 | -1857 | 51.0%52 | 36.8%74 | 68.8%37 |
| 15-16 | 15-19 | #139 | 2.559 | 106.763 | 104.254 | 7.384 | -1867 | -2134 | 21.5%2 | -9794 | 50.2%51 | 36.3%72 | 74.6%92 |
| 14-15 | 19-14 | #47 | 12.887 | 109.184 | 96.384 | 7.484 | +1952 | +2769 | 30.2%39 | -9794 | 47.6%28 | 35.5%65 | 79.4%100 |
| 13-14 | 20-15 | #63 | 10.683 | 107.159 | 96.592 | 9.295 | +1950 | -1143 | 31.2%45 | -4876 | 46.5%10 | 31.7%14 | 73.3%84 |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-ITrue Shooting %
52.2%#184
Effective FG %
47.6%#231
3-Point %
35.5%#111
3PAR
35.2%#150
FTAR
31.2%#314
Assist %
49.5%#252
Shot Profile
vs D-IRim rateshare of shots at the rim
21.3%#349
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
43.6%#342
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–
Shot Clock
18 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Offense
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0066D-I 0.96
Early 0–10s0.818950.4% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.172328.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.225821.3% of shots
Defense
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9664Allowed, D-I 0.98
Early 0–10s0.696549.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.265324.3% of shots
Late 21s+1.186026.4% of shots
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 14-15. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 14-15. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.