Poss2,580
Net Rtg14.070
ORtg119.274
DRtg105.254
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,580 | 1,229 | 14.070 | 119.274 | 105.254 | 53.5%62 | 36.5%72 | 14.8%62 | 37.2%68 | 47.9%62 | 72.4%66 | 12.4%20 | 26.7%56 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 536 | 282 | 10.264 | 116.368 | 106.050 | 54.6%66 | 37.7%78 | 17.4%44 | 30.1%50 | 49.6%54 | 74.2%74 | 12.1%20 | 19.7%78 |
| HawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 155 | 71 | 6.758 | 120.776 | 114.032 | 56.6%74 | 32.4%58 | 17.4%42 | 50.4%88 | 51.6%44 | 70.0%54 | 12.9%24 | 52.5%8 |
| HawkinsC. HawkinsGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 126 | 59 | 11.666 | 136.094 | 124.414 | 58.1%80 | 42.3%88 | 11.1%84 | 44.4%82 | 59.7%14 | 73.4%70 | 12.5%22 | 42.5%18 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. Domask | 126 | 67 | 7.460 | 111.556 | 104.256 | 50.0%42 | 32.4%58 | 15.1%60 | 35.5%64 | 47.0%66 | 64.9%34 | 12.3%20 | 12.1%92 |
| DainjaD. DainjaGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 107 | 50 | -7.134 | 95.822 | 102.958 | 44.9%24 | 31.1%52 | 15.8%54 | 22.2%28 | 43.8%78 | 72.7%66 | 7.7%6 | 20.2%76 |
| HawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskHarmonJ. Harmon | 105 | 50 | 16.474 | 122.380 | 105.952 | 58.5%82 | 27.1%36 | 13.4%72 | 37.5%68 | 48.9%56 | 76.9%82 | 12.6%22 | 25.3%60 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 94 | 44 | -7.434 | 120.776 | 128.110 | 50.0%42 | 30.2%48 | 9.6%90 | 41.7%76 | 55.2%28 | 65.3%34 | 8.5%8 | 37.9%24 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskHarmonJ. Harmon | 66 | 27 | 35.994 | 140.496 | 104.556 | 55.8%70 | 48.3%96 | 13.7%70 | 75.0%98 | 55.9%24 | 75.0%74 | 21.2%78 | 17.6%84 |
| HawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 65 | 30 | -3.640 | 106.946 | 110.540 | 42.1%16 | 30.8%50 | 7.7%94 | 28.6%46 | 57.1%20 | 82.6%94 | 15.5%40 | 54.8%8 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskHarmonJ. Harmon | 62 | 29 | 39.194 | 132.792 | 93.678 | 57.6%78 | 41.2%86 | 9.7%90 | 12.1%8 | 41.4%86 | 65.1%34 | 15.3%40 | 20.3%76 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 61 | 25 | 39.996 | 146.7100 | 106.848 | 65.6%96 | 20.0%12 | 6.6%96 | 73.3%98 | 42.2%82 | 65.9%36 | 10.3%12 | 29.3%48 |
| DainjaD. DainjaRodgersT. RodgersGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 51 | 26 | 43.996 | 101.332 | 57.498 | 44.3%22 | 35.5%70 | 11.7%82 | 13.2%8 | 25.0%98 | 75.7%78 | 13.4%26 | 18.0%82 |
| DainjaD. DainjaHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 45 | 20 | 72.0100 | 171.8100 | 99.866 | 83.3%100 | 46.2%94 | 11.2%84 | 81.8%100 | 36.5%94 | 75.0%74 | 9.5%10 | 45.9%14 |
| RodgersT. RodgersHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 39 | 21 | 9.764 | 127.188 | 117.524 | 60.5%86 | 50.0%98 | 25.4%6 | 18.4%18 | 54.8%28 | 69.6%52 | 11.3%16 | 21.4%74 |
| Gibbs-LawhornD. Gibbs-LawhornHawkinsC. HawkinsGoodeL. GoodeDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr. | 34 | 14 | 4.454 | 113.962 | 109.542 | 55.0%68 | 26.3%32 | 11.7%82 | 36.7%68 | 55.8%26 | 66.7%38 | 23.1%86 | 46.2%14 |
| DainjaD. DainjaGuerrierQ. GuerrierDomaskM. DomaskShannon Jr.T. Shannon Jr.HarmonJ. Harmon | 31 | 12 | 3.152 | 105.342 | 102.260 | 56.0%72 | 23.1%22 | 19.2%32 | 28.0%44 | 42.9%82 | 77.8%84 | 9.9%10 | 25.0%62 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24 (4,483 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

