MAAC

Iona

16-17NET#188Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #158Coach: Tobin Anderson

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	1,813	893	1.1—	108.1—	106.9—	49.9%—	32.7%—	16.0%—	28.4%—	52.8%—	63.7%—	23.5%—	36.7%—
QuigleyJ. QuigleyAdewaleS. AdewalePanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. Brown	96	50	10.1—	96.5—	86.3—	45.5%—	25.0%—	13.5%—	27.3%—	44.9%—	69.6%—	26.4%—	21.3%—
GordonG. GordonAdewaleS. AdewalePanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. Brown	94	43	2.0—	107.4—	105.4—	49.5%—	36.2%—	14.9%—	18.3%—	51.8%—	69.2%—	19.4%—	23.2%—
QuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoBrownJ. BrownShemaO. Shema	89	45	-6.9—	99.8—	106.7—	43.0%—	31.7%—	14.6%—	43.0%—	50.0%—	58.8%—	24.8%—	37.7%—
QuigleyJ. QuigleyPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. BrownShemaO. Shema	74	40	-7.8—	92.8—	100.6—	45.6%—	15.9%—	16.1%—	45.6%—	49.2%—	64.1%—	23.8%—	28.6%—
GordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. BrownShemaO. Shema	63	32	25.2—	104.1—	78.9—	47.7%—	28.2%—	9.5%—	7.6%—	47.7%—	69.2%—	36.2%—	13.6%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenQuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoBrownJ. Brown	49	21	10.8—	131.6—	120.7—	64.3%—	40.0%—	20.6%—	33.3%—	66.2%—	73.7%—	20.8%—	55.9%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenGordonG. GordonTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. BrownShemaO. Shema	48	27	35.4—	134.0—	98.7—	56.7%—	40.6%—	8.4%—	19.2%—	37.8%—	55.9%—	16.4%—	28.6%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenQuigleyJ. QuigleyPanzoW. PanzoBrownJ. BrownShemaO. Shema	42	21	-8.5—	87.1—	95.6—	46.2%—	12.5%—	14.1%—	2.6%—	54.7%—	80.0%—	22.1%—	25.0%—
QuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutShemaO. Shema	37	23	-4.3—	101.7—	106.0—	44.9%—	28.0%—	8.0%—	12.8%—	47.1%—	68.2%—	15.5%—	35.3%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenQuigleyJ. QuigleyPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutShemaO. Shema	36	19	47.5—	140.2—	92.7—	63.9%—	33.3%—	11.0%—	13.9%—	46.0%—	66.7%—	25.6%—	36.0%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenAdewaleS. AdewalePanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. TretoutBrownJ. Brown	33	16	50.5—	131.3—	80.8—	72.0%—	15.4%—	15.3%—	40.0%—	63.2%—	90.0%—	38.8%—	10.5%—
SaundersD. SaundersQuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. Tretout	32	14	-29.1—	102.4—	131.4—	46.7%—	38.1%—	15.5%—	36.7%—	69.2%—	64.3%—	20.8%—	15.4%—
QuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonAdewaleS. AdewalePanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. Tretout	31	15	-18.8—	105.5—	124.4—	46.3%—	38.9%—	22.4%—	33.3%—	77.3%—	57.1%—	31.1%—	9.1%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenQuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoTretoutI. Tretout	31	14	24.9—	126.8—	101.9—	56.9%—	42.1%—	16.3%—	34.5%—	39.1%—	61.1%—	17.5%—	113.0%—
ArangurenJ. ArangurenQuigleyJ. QuigleyGordonG. GordonPanzoW. PanzoShemaO. Shema	30	15	-30.0—	98.9—	128.9—	35.1%—	48.1%—	9.9%—	18.9%—	63.0%—	69.2%—	15.7%—	29.6%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.