Iowa St.29-8

Big 12Coach: T.J. Otzelberger

29-8NET#5

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keshon Gilbert	1,718	474	78.4%	+3.162	−4.130	−7.282	−1.238	+2.674	+3.78	+3.772	−2.474	−2.924	+3.592	−2.162
Milan Momcilovic	1,696	496	77.4%	−3.736	−5.224	−1.558	+0.456	−2.530	−0.964	−22.32	−4.688	−2.826	−2.516	−5.376
Tamin Lipsey	1,656	535	75.6%	+9.582	+2.060	−7.584	+0.656	−3.622	−2.078	+3.672	−5.792	+0.252	−0.150	−2.262
Curtis Jones	1,465	726	66.9%	−11.814	−1.244	+10.68	−1.930	−6.28	−1.874	+9.792	+4.710	+0.858	−2.318	+11.46
Tre King	1,285	907	58.6%	+4.568	−0.448	−4.974	+1.566	−2.628	−1.166	−8.912	−0.656	+1.768	+2.786	−4.272
Robert Jones	1,222	970	55.7%	−0.548	−0.846	−0.350	−0.446	+4.084	+1.230	−2.340	+3.020	+5.592	−0.936	−10.392
Hason Ward	676	1,515	30.9%	+0.852	+1.458	+0.646	+2.878	−8.14	−3.186	−9.310	−0.960	−5.410	+1.372	+6.518
Jackson Paveletzke	506	1,686	23.1%	−4.036	+2.162	+6.020	−0.446	+6.092	+1.824	+5.882	+6.64	+3.986	−0.052	−2.966
Demarion Watson	466	1,725	21.3%	−0.050	+3.368	+3.332	−0.050	+2.976	+0.934	+13.498	−2.170	−6.18	−0.544	+10.28
Omaha Biliew	202	1,990	9.2%	+6.876	+1.960	−4.974	−0.546	+9.798	+4.26	+13.198	−2.676	+2.272	+1.066	−1.860

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keshon Gilbert	1,718	474	78.4%	20.280	112.760	92.580	51.6%52	35.9%72	16.8%46	35.7%66	47.5%64	66.3%38	27.2%96	34.3%34
Milan Momcilovic	1,696	496	77.4%	18.778	112.458	93.878	52.0%54	34.7%66	15.8%54	30.1%50	47.0%66	66.3%38	25.8%92	33.6%34
Tamin Lipsey	1,656	535	75.6%	21.882	114.162	92.380	52.0%54	34.4%64	15.5%56	35.8%66	46.7%66	67.0%42	26.4%94	34.3%34
Curtis Jones	1,465	726	66.9%	15.672	113.260	97.672	51.2%50	33.3%58	15.4%58	38.2%70	49.6%54	67.2%42	25.6%92	38.6%24
Tre King	1,285	907	58.6%	21.480	113.460	92.182	52.5%56	34.2%64	15.6%56	31.3%54	47.7%62	67.7%44	27.6%96	33.0%38
Robert Jones	1,222	970	55.7%	19.378	113.360	94.078	51.7%54	37.1%76	16.5%50	33.9%60	49.3%54	69.5%52	26.0%92	30.3%44
Hason Ward	676	1,515	30.9%	20.080	114.664	94.678	53.8%64	29.6%46	13.9%68	28.5%46	47.4%64	63.2%26	27.3%96	39.3%22
Jackson Paveletzke	506	1,686	23.1%	16.474	115.266	98.868	51.5%52	39.9%82	17.4%44	39.3%72	53.1%36	70.0%54	26.4%94	32.6%38
Demarion Watson	466	1,725	21.3%	19.578	116.268	96.774	51.9%54	37.6%78	16.7%48	45.5%82	46.4%68	62.3%24	26.0%92	42.6%18
Omaha Biliew	202	1,990	9.2%	25.786	115.366	89.784	51.4%52	44.1%92	19.8%28	46.9%84	45.6%72	69.0%50	27.3%96	33.1%36

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Keshon Gilbert	1,718	474	78.4%	17.274	116.970	99.766	52.8%58	33.3%62	13.1%74	32.0%56	49.9%54	69.2%50	23.7%88	36.4%28
Milan Momcilovic	1,696	496	77.4%	22.482	117.672	95.276	51.6%52	37.3%76	16.7%48	52.4%90	51.6%44	69.2%50	28.4%96	38.9%24
Tamin Lipsey	1,656	535	75.6%	12.368	112.158	99.866	51.4%52	38.1%78	17.6%42	32.2%56	52.4%40	66.8%42	26.5%94	36.5%28
Curtis Jones	1,465	726	66.9%	27.488	114.464	87.188	53.1%60	39.5%82	17.2%44	28.5%46	44.9%74	66.4%38	28.0%96	27.2%54
Tre King	1,285	907	58.6%	16.974	113.962	97.072	51.0%50	36.8%74	16.6%48	40.2%74	48.4%60	66.0%36	24.8%90	37.1%26
Robert Jones	1,222	970	55.7%	19.880	114.062	94.378	52.1%56	33.1%58	15.4%58	36.2%66	46.3%68	64.0%30	26.9%94	40.6%20
Hason Ward	676	1,515	30.9%	19.278	113.260	93.978	51.0%50	37.7%78	17.0%46	37.8%70	48.3%60	68.6%48	26.0%92	32.8%38
Jackson Paveletzke	506	1,686	23.1%	20.480	113.160	92.780	52.0%54	33.8%64	15.6%56	33.5%60	46.5%68	66.1%38	26.4%94	35.4%30
Demarion Watson	466	1,725	21.3%	19.578	112.960	93.480	51.9%54	34.7%66	15.8%54	32.1%56	48.5%58	68.5%48	26.5%94	32.4%38
Omaha Biliew	202	1,990	9.2%	18.978	113.460	94.678	51.9%54	34.4%64	15.6%56	33.7%60	48.3%60	66.7%42	26.3%94	34.9%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.