Iowa St.25-10

Big 12Coach: T.J. Otzelberger

25-10NET#12

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Curtis Jones	1,759	594	74.8%	−2.740	+3.268	+5.920	−0.942	−0.646	−2.180	+12.396	+2.920	+2.676	−3.48	−0.050
Tamin Lipsey	1,751	602	74.4%	−1.744	−4.328	−2.664	−3.916	−5.510	−2.382	+8.290	−1.768	−5.112	+3.192	+2.734
Joshua Jefferson	1,734	619	73.7%	−1.644	+2.866	+4.326	−0.148	+3.380	+0.442	+4.576	+1.334	−0.150	−1.824	−2.062
Keshon Gilbert	1,514	839	64.3%	+11.088	+3.670	−7.484	−0.446	+6.494	+1.032	−3.332	−4.690	−3.122	+1.676	−3.770
Milan Momcilovic	1,286	1,067	54.7%	+11.488	+10.594	−0.954	+9.3100	−3.620	−0.964	−6.518	−1.868	+0.556	−0.248	+0.646
Nate Heise	1,273	1,079	54.1%	+8.882	+8.890	+0.050	+5.394	−3.124	−2.684	+5.078	+1.136	+4.086	−1.526	+0.844
Dishon Jackson	1,095	1,258	46.5%	−5.032	−7.218	−2.262	−3.318	−2.528	+0.148	−3.532	−5.492	+0.354	−4.24	+2.236
Brandton Chatfield	809	1,543	34.4%	−9.020	−2.638	+6.418	+1.466	+0.960	+2.416	−11.76	+8.20	+1.162	+2.688	−5.176
Demarion Watson	254	2,099	10.8%	−21.74	−24.62	−2.864	−11.42	+0.556	+5.90	+1.964	+0.642	+2.070	+2.890	+4.824
Nojus Indrusaitis	132	2,220	5.6%	+0.652	−3.334	−4.070	−9.92	+10.9100	+1.428	+21.9100	−1.970	+2.272	+3.192	+10.86

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Curtis Jones	1,759	594	74.8%	17.776	118.072	100.368	54.7%64	35.4%68	17.1%46	40.9%76	49.7%56	70.2%56	21.3%76	29.4%50
Tamin Lipsey	1,751	602	74.4%	18.076	116.166	98.172	53.9%62	34.1%64	17.0%46	39.9%74	48.5%60	68.2%46	22.9%84	30.1%46
Joshua Jefferson	1,734	619	73.7%	18.076	118.070	100.068	54.9%66	36.4%72	17.7%42	39.0%72	49.3%56	69.5%52	21.7%78	28.8%52
Keshon Gilbert	1,514	839	64.3%	22.482	118.572	96.174	54.8%66	37.7%76	18.0%40	36.6%68	47.3%66	68.5%48	22.7%84	28.1%54
Milan Momcilovic	1,286	1,067	54.7%	23.784	122.078	98.370	59.1%82	33.7%62	17.2%46	34.8%64	48.1%62	69.8%54	22.0%80	29.6%48
Nate Heise	1,273	1,079	54.1%	22.582	121.378	98.870	57.4%76	34.0%64	16.4%52	40.1%74	49.5%56	71.5%62	21.5%78	29.7%48
Dishon Jackson	1,095	1,258	46.5%	15.874	113.460	97.672	53.1%58	34.2%64	17.6%42	35.9%66	46.1%70	69.8%54	19.9%70	30.5%46
Brandton Chatfield	809	1,543	34.4%	12.668	115.566	102.960	55.8%70	36.1%70	19.2%32	30.2%50	54.4%32	70.3%56	23.8%88	26.0%60
Demarion Watson	254	2,099	10.8%	-1.046	95.320	96.274	44.7%22	35.9%70	22.8%14	39.4%72	49.5%56	71.3%60	24.6%90	33.6%38
Nojus Indrusaitis	132	2,220	5.6%	19.078	114.162	95.076	45.6%24	45.7%94	18.9%34	58.4%94	47.2%66	71.6%62	25.0%90	39.6%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Curtis Jones	1,759	594	74.8%	20.480	114.864	94.478	55.5%68	36.0%70	19.2%30	28.6%46	46.8%68	67.6%44	24.6%90	29.4%50
Tamin Lipsey	1,751	602	74.4%	19.778	120.576	100.766	57.7%78	39.6%80	19.3%30	31.7%54	50.2%50	73.3%70	19.9%70	27.4%56
Joshua Jefferson	1,734	619	73.7%	19.678	115.264	95.676	55.0%66	33.1%58	17.3%44	34.5%62	48.0%62	69.7%54	23.4%86	30.8%44
Keshon Gilbert	1,514	839	64.3%	11.466	114.964	103.558	55.1%66	31.3%52	16.9%46	39.9%74	52.0%44	71.7%62	21.1%76	31.8%42
Milan Momcilovic	1,286	1,067	54.7%	12.268	111.556	99.368	49.8%40	37.3%74	18.1%38	41.3%76	49.9%54	69.3%52	22.2%82	29.1%50
Nate Heise	1,273	1,079	54.1%	13.770	112.558	98.870	52.1%54	37.1%74	19.0%32	35.1%64	48.4%60	67.4%42	23.0%84	28.9%50
Dishon Jackson	1,095	1,258	46.5%	20.880	120.676	99.868	56.4%72	36.7%72	17.6%42	39.4%72	51.5%46	69.4%52	24.1%88	28.3%52
Brandton Chatfield	809	1,543	34.4%	21.682	118.172	96.574	54.4%64	35.2%68	16.8%48	41.9%78	46.2%70	69.2%52	21.2%76	31.1%44
Demarion Watson	254	2,099	10.8%	20.880	119.974	99.170	56.1%72	35.5%68	17.0%46	37.6%70	48.9%58	69.3%52	21.8%80	28.8%52
Nojus Indrusaitis	132	2,220	5.6%	18.478	117.470	99.070	55.4%68	34.8%66	17.5%42	36.5%68	49.1%56	69.4%52	21.9%80	28.8%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.