Kentucky24-12

SECCoach: Mark Pope

24-12NET#14

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Otega Oweh	1,697	716	70.3%	−2.042	−4.626	−2.664	−4.214	−2.430	−2.282	+6.182	−2.576	−0.348	+1.068	−1.760
Koby Brea	1,694	719	70.2%	−3.140	+4.474	+7.514	+3.786	−5.312	−0.964	+3.874	+2.226	−3.420	−1.526	+4.026
Andrew Carr	1,417	996	58.7%	+18.498	+6.482	−12.094	+2.072	−0.744	−3.088	+1.260	−2.274	+5.894	+1.170	−7.284
Amari Williams	1,375	1,038	57.0%	+10.786	+4.374	−6.380	+3.080	+2.876	+0.738	+4.276	−3.382	+2.576	−0.346	−7.586
Lamont Butler	1,209	1,204	50.1%	+19.698	+8.088	−11.694	+1.566	+4.186	−1.976	+4.778	−4.388	−0.546	+5.3100	+6.218
Jaxson Robinson	1,140	1,273	47.3%	+10.586	+11.496	+1.044	+3.686	+8.298	−0.354	−2.438	−2.070	−2.230	−1.528	+1.044
Brandon Garrison	993	1,421	41.1%	−14.810	−4.130	+10.66	−2.328	−1.242	+0.344	−4.726	+4.610	−4.414	−1.034	+2.038
Ansley Almonor	850	1,564	35.2%	−10.318	−7.516	+2.834	−2.922	+0.456	+1.824	−6.816	+0.246	−0.744	−0.246	+1.144
Collin Chandler	517	1,897	21.4%	−12.014	−4.228	+7.812	+0.758	−2.232	+2.912	−6.518	+5.36	+1.364	−0.444	+3.430
Travis Perry	482	1,932	20.0%	−23.34	−13.76	+9.68	−5.310	−6.76	+0.344	−0.450	+6.04	+4.086	−2.912	+1.640
Trent Noah	424	1,989	17.6%	−12.314	−6.818	+5.522	−0.150	−1.834	+4.06	+4.978	+5.08	+3.382	−1.034	+2.436
Kerr Kriisa	266	2,148	11.0%	−0.350	−8.614	−8.286	−4.412	−0.844	+1.824	−8.212	−6.996	−5.78	−0.148	−7.686

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Otega Oweh	1,697	716	70.3%	6.960	115.766	108.944	54.4%64	29.0%42	14.7%64	37.0%68	50.2%50	71.4%60	14.6%32	30.4%46
Koby Brea	1,694	719	70.2%	6.558	118.472	111.936	56.8%74	28.0%38	15.1%62	36.3%66	51.5%46	70.4%56	13.8%28	32.1%42
Andrew Carr	1,417	996	58.7%	15.072	119.774	104.756	56.5%72	29.4%44	14.1%68	35.6%66	50.0%54	73.9%72	14.7%32	27.9%54
Amari Williams	1,375	1,038	57.0%	12.168	119.072	106.950	57.0%74	31.0%50	15.6%58	37.0%68	49.5%56	72.5%66	14.2%30	27.7%54
Lamont Butler	1,209	1,204	50.1%	17.376	121.176	103.858	56.4%72	31.8%54	14.4%66	37.5%68	48.7%58	71.2%60	17.0%48	34.1%36
Jaxson Robinson	1,140	1,273	47.3%	13.068	123.180	110.142	57.5%76	33.9%62	15.2%60	33.9%60	49.9%54	70.3%56	13.5%24	31.4%44
Brandon Garrison	993	1,421	41.1%	-1.246	114.662	115.828	54.3%64	29.1%42	15.5%58	32.4%58	53.5%36	68.8%50	13.7%26	32.1%42
Ansley Almonor	850	1,564	35.2%	0.848	112.358	111.538	53.8%62	30.0%46	16.5%50	30.8%52	51.0%48	71.0%60	14.1%30	31.6%42
Collin Chandler	517	1,897	21.4%	-2.044	113.860	115.728	56.2%72	27.9%38	17.6%42	30.0%50	55.1%30	72.4%66	14.0%28	33.6%38
Travis Perry	482	1,932	20.0%	-11.228	106.142	117.326	51.4%50	24.4%26	15.6%58	34.8%64	55.7%26	74.7%74	11.9%16	32.2%42
Trent Noah	424	1,989	17.6%	-2.742	111.556	114.232	55.6%70	28.2%40	18.6%36	39.2%72	55.0%30	74.2%74	13.5%24	32.9%40
Kerr Kriisa	266	2,148	11.0%	7.260	109.550	102.362	51.7%52	29.1%42	16.9%46	27.9%44	44.8%74	66.5%38	14.2%30	24.2%66

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Otega Oweh	1,697	716	70.3%	8.862	120.376	111.538	58.6%80	31.4%52	16.9%48	30.9%52	52.6%40	71.6%62	13.6%26	32.1%42
Koby Brea	1,694	719	70.2%	9.664	114.062	104.456	53.1%58	33.3%62	16.0%54	32.5%58	49.4%56	73.8%72	15.4%38	28.1%54
Andrew Carr	1,417	996	58.7%	-3.442	113.360	116.726	54.4%64	30.1%48	17.1%46	34.5%62	52.2%42	68.0%46	13.7%26	35.1%34
Amari Williams	1,375	1,038	57.0%	1.450	114.662	113.234	53.9%62	28.2%40	14.9%62	32.8%58	52.8%40	70.0%54	14.5%32	35.2%34
Lamont Butler	1,209	1,204	50.1%	-2.342	113.160	115.430	54.9%66	27.7%38	16.3%52	32.8%58	52.9%38	71.7%62	11.6%16	27.9%54
Jaxson Robinson	1,140	1,273	47.3%	2.552	111.756	109.244	53.9%62	25.7%30	15.5%58	36.3%66	51.9%44	72.5%66	15.0%34	30.4%46
Brandon Garrison	993	1,421	41.1%	13.670	118.872	105.254	56.6%74	30.2%48	15.2%60	37.1%68	49.0%58	73.2%70	14.7%32	30.1%46
Ansley Almonor	850	1,564	35.2%	11.166	119.774	108.746	56.7%74	29.6%44	14.7%64	37.6%70	50.8%50	71.7%62	14.4%30	30.5%46
Collin Chandler	517	1,897	21.4%	10.064	118.072	108.048	55.5%68	30.2%48	14.7%64	36.5%68	49.8%54	71.2%60	14.4%30	30.2%46
Travis Perry	482	1,932	20.0%	12.168	119.874	107.848	56.7%74	31.1%52	15.3%60	35.2%64	49.7%56	70.7%58	14.9%34	30.6%46
Trent Noah	424	1,989	17.6%	9.664	118.372	108.746	55.7%70	30.0%48	14.6%66	34.4%62	50.0%50	70.9%60	14.5%32	30.5%46
Kerr Kriisa	266	2,148	11.0%	7.560	118.072	110.540	56.2%72	29.8%46	15.1%62	36.1%66	51.7%44	72.2%64	14.3%30	31.8%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.