Memphis13-19

AmericanCoach: Anfernee Hardaway

13-19NET#135

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dug McDaniel	1,950	328	85.6%	−8.322	+2.866	+11.24	−3.220	−4.018	−5.198	+10.394	+7.72	−1.336	+1.272	+5.022
Curtis Givens III	1,114	1,164	48.9%	−8.322	+2.766	+10.96	+5.192	−2.528	+0.442	−4.726	+5.36	+0.050	−3.86	−8.388
Zach Davis	1,097	1,181	48.2%	+5.772	+4.374	−1.458	+2.072	+1.870	+0.442	+1.258	+1.632	+2.676	+1.880	+5.222
Sincere Parker	1,082	1,196	47.5%	+2.662	+2.966	+0.248	−1.436	−1.736	−3.894	+2.566	−2.070	+2.274	−1.526	+15.52
Quante Berry	978	1,301	42.9%	−3.238	−7.316	−4.172	−5.010	−0.646	−0.658	−3.532	−2.070	+0.556	+0.152	−0.150
Julius Thedford	970	1,308	42.6%	+8.180	+5.380	−2.864	+1.972	+0.860	−0.354	+9.592	−1.666	+0.658	−0.640	−3.168
Aaron Bradshaw	969	1,309	42.6%	+1.256	+3.370	+2.136	−1.238	+6.996	+1.526	+2.968	+0.840	−1.634	+1.474	−0.854
Ashton Hardaway	829	1,449	36.4%	−8.920	−6.918	+2.036	+0.456	−3.222	+3.48	−4.626	−1.566	−4.016	−1.034	−3.368
Thierno Sylla	556	1,722	24.4%	+2.662	−2.736	−5.378	+0.456	−3.024	+0.148	+1.760	−4.286	−1.138	−2.218	−10.392
Simon Majok	538	1,741	23.6%	+7.076	+8.290	+1.242	+2.778	+5.492	−0.354	+5.278	+0.544	−0.644	−0.738	−7.786
Hasan Abdul Hakim	508	1,770	22.3%	−2.740	−7.316	−4.674	+0.860	−3.124	+3.96	−6.020	+0.938	+2.676	+3.694	−3.570
Tariq Ingraham	411	1,867	18.0%	+10.688	−1.046	−11.694	−1.040	+1.062	−1.066	−6.818	−4.388	+1.162	+3.694	+9.78
William Whorton	310	1,968	13.6%	−5.928	−4.726	+1.142	−1.038	−0.746	+1.034	−9.78	−0.960	+2.172	−1.328	+6.416

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dug McDaniel	1,950	328	85.6%	-3.640	104.434	108.148	48.0%30	34.6%68	18.1%32	36.3%58	49.7%58	64.0%26	18.8%70	43.2%24
Curtis Givens III	1,114	1,164	48.9%	-6.734	105.436	112.038	51.1%44	33.8%66	19.0%26	32.4%48	51.2%50	64.2%26	16.7%54	38.3%34
Zach Davis	1,097	1,181	48.2%	0.646	106.338	105.754	49.5%36	36.1%74	19.0%26	35.4%56	49.4%58	65.6%32	19.5%74	45.2%20
Sincere Parker	1,082	1,196	47.5%	-1.044	105.538	106.652	47.8%30	34.2%66	16.8%42	36.1%58	47.5%66	65.4%30	17.9%62	50.7%14
Quante Berry	978	1,301	42.9%	-4.338	99.826	104.158	45.7%22	34.8%68	18.5%30	32.9%48	47.4%66	64.5%28	18.7%68	42.4%24
Julius Thedford	970	1,308	42.6%	2.250	107.140	104.956	49.6%36	35.6%72	18.7%28	40.4%66	47.6%66	64.6%28	18.3%66	40.6%28
Aaron Bradshaw	969	1,309	42.6%	-1.742	105.938	107.650	47.8%30	39.0%82	19.7%22	36.5%58	49.0%60	63.3%24	19.4%74	42.0%26
Ashton Hardaway	829	1,449	36.4%	-8.132	99.626	107.750	48.8%34	33.0%62	21.0%16	31.9%46	47.6%66	61.8%20	18.0%64	40.4%28
Thierno Sylla	556	1,722	24.4%	-0.544	102.030	102.562	48.8%34	32.8%62	18.9%28	36.1%58	45.5%74	63.5%24	17.0%56	34.8%42
Simon Majok	538	1,741	23.6%	2.950	110.350	107.450	50.5%42	39.3%84	18.6%30	38.8%64	48.9%60	63.8%26	18.1%64	36.6%38
Hasan Abdul Hakim	508	1,770	22.3%	-4.438	98.422	102.862	49.2%36	32.7%60	21.8%12	30.2%42	49.3%58	66.3%32	21.4%82	39.7%30
Tariq Ingraham	411	1,867	18.0%	6.356	103.232	96.974	47.7%30	35.9%72	18.0%32	29.3%40	44.9%76	65.2%30	21.5%82	50.5%14
William Whorton	310	1,968	13.6%	-7.534	99.926	107.450	47.6%30	34.5%68	19.7%22	26.5%32	47.8%66	66.0%32	17.5%60	48.0%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dug McDaniel	1,950	328	85.6%	4.754	101.628	96.974	51.2%44	38.6%82	23.2%8	26.0%30	42.0%86	65.3%30	17.6%60	38.2%34
Curtis Givens III	1,114	1,164	48.9%	1.648	102.732	101.166	46.0%24	36.3%74	18.6%28	37.1%60	45.9%72	64.2%26	20.5%78	46.6%18
Zach Davis	1,097	1,181	48.2%	-5.236	102.030	107.150	47.6%28	34.3%66	18.6%28	34.3%52	47.8%66	63.0%22	17.8%62	40.0%30
Sincere Parker	1,082	1,196	47.5%	-3.640	102.732	106.352	49.2%36	35.9%72	20.7%18	33.6%52	49.5%58	63.2%24	19.3%72	35.2%40
Quante Berry	978	1,301	42.9%	-1.044	107.240	108.248	50.7%42	35.4%70	19.1%26	36.4%58	49.4%58	64.0%26	18.6%68	42.4%24
Julius Thedford	970	1,308	42.6%	-5.836	101.830	107.650	47.7%30	34.8%68	19.0%26	30.9%44	49.3%58	64.0%26	18.9%70	43.8%22
Aaron Bradshaw	969	1,309	42.6%	-2.940	102.630	105.554	49.0%34	32.1%60	18.2%32	33.6%52	48.2%64	64.9%28	18.0%64	42.8%24
Ashton Hardaway	829	1,449	36.4%	0.848	106.540	105.754	48.4%32	36.3%74	17.6%36	36.4%58	49.1%58	65.7%32	19.0%70	43.7%22
Thierno Sylla	556	1,722	24.4%	-3.040	104.736	107.748	48.4%32	35.8%72	18.8%28	34.4%54	49.6%58	64.5%28	19.2%72	45.1%20
Simon Majok	538	1,741	23.6%	-4.038	102.130	106.152	47.9%30	33.9%66	18.9%26	33.6%52	48.4%62	64.4%28	18.8%70	44.3%22
Hasan Abdul Hakim	508	1,770	22.3%	-1.842	105.738	107.550	48.3%32	35.8%72	18.0%34	36.1%58	48.3%62	63.7%26	17.8%62	43.2%24
Tariq Ingraham	411	1,867	18.0%	-4.338	104.234	108.548	48.7%34	34.9%68	19.0%26	36.1%58	49.3%58	64.0%26	18.0%64	40.8%28
William Whorton	310	1,968	13.6%	-1.642	104.736	106.352	48.7%34	35.2%70	18.7%28	36.2%58	48.7%60	64.0%26	18.8%70	41.6%26

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.