Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Merrimack logoMerrimack logoMerrimack logoMerrimack logo

Merrimack9-9

NECCoach: Joe Gallo

9-9NET#230
Schedule
WSacred Heart logoSacred Heart logoLSacred Heart logoSacred Heart logoLMount St. Mary's logoMount St. Mary's logoLMount St. Mary's logoMount St. Mary's logoWFairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson logoWFairleigh Dickinson logoFairleigh Dickinson logoWLIU logoLIU logoLLIU logoLIU logoWSaint Francis logoWSaint Francis logoWCentral Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logoWCentral Connecticut logoCentral Connecticut logoLBryant logoBryant logoLBryant logoBryant logoLSt. Francis NY logoWSt. Francis NY logoLWagner logoWagner logoLWagner logoWagner logo

Team Stats

18 games
  • Net Rating-0.649
  • Offensive Rating104.439
  • Defensive Rating105.062
  • Pace63.531
  • Effective FG%51.4%72
  • Off Rebound Pct20.8%5
  • Turnover Pct21.4%33
  • FT Attempt Rate31.0%47

Team Stats

18 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-0.649
  • Offensive Rating104.439
  • Defensive Rating105.062
  • Pace63.531
  • Effective FG%51.4%72
  • Off Rebound Pct20.8%5
  • Turnover Pct21.4%33
  • FT Attempt Rate31.0%47

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct50.0%53
  • Point Margin / Game-0.449
  • Points / Game66.322
  • Points Allowed / Game66.782
  • 1st Half Margin-0.347
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.150
  • Avg Largest Lead9.443
  • Avg Largest Deficit11.143

Box Score

  • Points / Game66.322
  • Rebounds / Game30.97
  • Assists / Game12.031
  • ORebs / Game6.96
  • DRebs / Game24.028
  • Steals / Game8.091
  • Blocks / Game3.876
  • Turnovers / Game13.642
  • PFs / Game16.962

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.128
  • FGAs / Game53.78
  • Field Goal Pct44.9%72
  • 2PMs / Game17.136
  • 2PAs / Game31.610
  • 2-Point Pct54.1%91
  • 3PMs / Game7.044
  • 3PAs / Game22.157
  • 3-Point Pct31.7%23
  • FTMs / Game11.121
  • FTAs / Game16.729
  • Free Throw Pct66.3%13

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.6%56
  • % Pts from 3s31.7%58
  • % Pts from FTs16.7%26
  • Paint Pts / Game20.866
  • % Pts in Paint31.3%74
  • Fast Break Pts / Game8.189
  • % Pts on Fast Break12.2%91
  • Points off TOVs / Game13.779
  • % Pts off TOVs20.7%87
  • 1st Half Pts / Game30.621
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game34.823

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.3%60
  • Points / Shot1.2354
  • 3-Point Att Rate41.2%80
  • Assist Pct49.8%37
  • Assists / 100 Poss18.937
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.88x32
  • PF Drawn / Game16.736

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%48.0%78
  • Opp True Shooting %52.0%76
  • Opp Field Goal Pct42.2%73
  • Opp 2-Point Pct46.1%89
  • Opp 3-Point Pct34.4%38
  • Opp 3PA Rate33.5%83
  • Opp FT Att Rate33.0%40
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1971

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game66.782
  • Paint Pts Allowed20.336
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.927
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed13.628
  • Opp Assist Pct57.9%13
  • TOVs Forced / Game14.984

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.4%15
  • Turnovers Forced Pct23.5%88
  • Steal Pct12.6%94
  • Block Pct5.9%78
  • Hakeem Pct18.5%93
  • PF Efficiency1.02x43
  • Steals / PF0.47x91
  • Blocks / PF0.22x77

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 246 D-I teams
  • #13FB Pts %18.0%
  • #39Opp TOV%22.2%
  • #64PO TOV Diff+3
  • #80Opp eFG%48.0%
  • #89Paint Pts %43.0%
  • #100eFG%51.4%
  • #1293PM Diff+10
  • #130Adj DRtg101.0
Where they rank bestof 246 D-I teams
  • #13FB Pts %18.0%
  • #39Opp TOV%22.2%
  • #64PO TOV Diff+3
  • #80Opp eFG%48.0%
  • #89Paint Pts %43.0%
  • #100eFG%51.4%
  • #1293PM Diff+10
  • #130Adj DRtg101.0
Where they rank worstof 246 D-I teams
  • #330OREB%20.8%
  • #312REB Diff-115
  • #302SOS-4.8
  • #297Opp OREB%31.6%
  • #291Adj ORtg96.3
  • #2663P%31.7%
  • #227TOV%20.2%
  • #223AST%49.8%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2020-21
Find Similar
  1. 1Southern Illinois logoSouthern Illinois logoSouthern Illinois 2019-2015-16MVC86
  2. 2Mount St. Mary's logoMount St. Mary's logoMount St. Mary's 2016-1719-16NEC85
  3. 3UTEP logoUTEP logoUTEP 2025-268-20C-USA83
  4. 4Miami OH logoMiami OH logoMiami OH 2023-2413-17MAC83
  5. 5Saint Francis logoSaint Francis 2014-1515-16NEC82
  6. 6Stonehill logoStonehill logoStonehill 2022-2313-17NEC82
  7. 7Air Force logoAir Force logoAir Force 2021-2211-18MWC80
  8. 8Hartford 2020-2115-9America East78
  9. 9Houston Christian logoHouston Christian logoHouston Christian 2024-2510-20Southland77
  10. 10Manhattan logoManhattan logoManhattan 2015-1613-18MAAC76
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Devin Jensen headshotDevinJensenSr
Jordan McKoy headshotJordanMcKoySo
Mykel Derring headshotMykelDerringSoMikey Watkins headshotMikeyWatkinsJrZiggy Reid headshotZiggyReidSoJMJordanMinorSoEHEthanHelwigFr
RMRyanMillerJr
JDJaylenDavisFr
JCJustinConnollyJr
JIJames BerryIIIFr
Malik Edmead headshotMalikEdmeadFr
RIRyanIsaacsonFr
D. JensenSr6'5"-0.524––51.4%4112.7%177.93.61.431.7%62.5%
J. McKoySo6'5"-0.622––50.5%3711.1%123.01.70.726.7%70.6%
M. DerringSo6'2"-0.912––56.4%6314.7%278.91.80.836.4%88.9%
M. WatkinsJr5'11"-1.010––56.5%6422.8%8012.03.73.831.1%69.1%
Z. ReidSo6'6"-1.010––56.3%6321.8%7511.55.41.229.2%81.5%
J. MinorSo6'8"-1.27––51.4%4128.4%9512.08.11.814.3%58.3%
E. HelwigFr6'4"–––87.2%9716.8%411.30.40.660.0%50.0%
R. MillerJr6'2"–––0.0%215.2%310.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. DavisFr6'3"––––0.0%20.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. ConnollyJr6'7"–––59.9%7715.2%313.22.30.90.0%61.5%
J. Berry IIIFr6'5"–––112.5%9919.2%592.31.00.375.0%0.0%
M. EdmeadFr5'10"–––52.6%4731.6%987.81.41.517.6%57.6%
R. IsaacsonFr6'8"–––42.1%1614.9%291.20.90.114.3%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo25-2623-11#1730.153107.942107.865-4.136-3240+899524.8%5-1219649.1%1632.7%2978.8%98
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo24-2518-15#178-0.953101.617102.580-4.139-3940+568420.8%1-20210049.4%2433.0%3672.3%52
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo23-2421-12#191-1.75098.310100.088-7.18-2192+558323.3%6-1009350.5%4230.9%1172.9%65
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo22-2318-16#303-9.71791.10100.977-7.86-2970+558420.8%3-1159449.1%2432.7%2768.9%21
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo21-2214-16#293-10.71695.08105.641-5.619-2831+347222.2%5-939048.8%2833.1%3767.5%14
Merrimack logoMerrimack logo19-2020-11#223-3.24095.61398.875-5.519-2501+1019823.2%11-1719949.3%4133.9%5968.1%24

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.8%#134
Effective FG %
51.4%#96
3-Point %
31.7%#265
3PAR
41.2%#70
FTAR
31.0%#182
Assist %
49.8%#219

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
41.9%#28
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
17.2%#14
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

16 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 32.3% of shots at 1.16 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9732.3%1.16Middle (11–20s): 32.8% of shots at 0.99 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0632.8%0.99Late (21s+): 34.9% of shots at 0.91 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0034.9%0.91SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.0261D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.169632.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s0.993232.8% of shots
Late 21s+0.912534.9% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 35.5% of shots at 1.00 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9735.5%1.00Middle (11–20s): 37.3% of shots at 1.02 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0637.3%1.02Late (21s+): 27.2% of shots at 0.87 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0027.2%0.87SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot0.9768Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.004435.5% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.026737.3% of shots
Late 21s+0.878927.2% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.