Milwaukee18-15

HorizonCoach: Bart Lundy

18-15NET#212

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Pullian	1,478	623	70.4%	+5.772	+8.588	+2.834	+2.778	+3.680	−1.570	+2.868	+4.710	+1.264	+3.994	+6.916
Elijah Jamison	1,397	704	66.5%	+9.984	+0.854	−9.188	+2.676	−2.928	+1.132	+6.786	−2.674	+4.186	+0.356	−3.870
Erik Pratt	1,387	714	66.0%	+3.664	+2.564	−1.156	+1.566	+0.960	−1.772	−6.618	−1.362	+3.380	−2.616	+1.042
BJ Freeman	1,340	761	63.8%	−0.350	+3.770	+4.028	+1.262	−6.68	−3.892	−3.730	+1.434	−2.628	+0.052	+3.132
Faizon Fields	1,088	1,013	51.8%	+1.556	−2.338	−3.868	−0.446	+2.674	+3.112	+10.394	−2.170	+0.758	+0.966	+6.816
Darius Duffy	684	1,417	32.6%	+2.660	+6.882	+4.128	+3.786	+4.486	−0.250	−8.214	+2.724	−2.924	+0.154	−6.882
Langston Wilson	661	1,440	31.5%	+5.170	+3.970	−1.356	+0.758	−4.018	−3.992	−3.234	−3.280	+2.070	−4.94	−7.484
Angelo Stuart	567	1,535	27.0%	−15.410	−9.812	+5.620	−6.76	+3.680	+2.516	−2.538	−1.968	−3.818	−2.814	+2.734
Learic Davis	476	1,626	22.6%	+19.998	+1.960	−18.098	+1.768	+0.152	+1.428	+7.988	−9.498	+4.990	+1.574	+1.342
Aaron Franklin	471	1,630	22.4%	−14.510	−4.528	+10.18	−3.816	+5.690	+2.912	+2.364	+7.12	−0.250	−0.150	−2.462
Markeith Browning II	422	1,679	20.1%	−20.64	−8.614	+12.04	−2.922	−0.844	+1.724	−5.224	+5.96	−7.94	+2.282	−1.256
Dominic Ham	343	1,758	16.3%	+3.262	−2.638	−5.878	−0.050	−3.522	−1.166	+1.358	+1.336	+2.170	+2.080	−8.186

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Pullian	1,478	623	70.4%	2.250	114.264	111.936	52.3%56	38.2%78	17.7%42	34.0%62	52.1%42	66.5%38	17.3%52	33.8%34
Elijah Jamison	1,397	704	66.5%	3.854	111.958	108.146	52.4%56	36.1%72	18.5%36	35.5%64	49.7%54	67.4%44	16.2%44	30.3%44
Erik Pratt	1,387	714	66.0%	1.850	112.558	110.738	52.0%54	37.5%76	17.5%42	31.0%54	50.1%50	67.2%42	15.2%38	31.9%40
BJ Freeman	1,340	761	63.8%	0.448	113.060	112.534	51.9%54	34.7%66	16.7%48	31.8%56	51.0%46	65.2%34	16.1%44	32.7%38
Faizon Fields	1,088	1,013	51.8%	1.348	110.654	109.344	51.3%50	38.5%80	19.6%28	38.3%70	49.5%54	66.4%38	16.5%46	35.0%32
Darius Duffy	684	1,417	32.6%	2.350	116.268	113.932	54.0%64	40.1%84	18.0%40	27.8%44	52.3%40	64.2%30	16.2%44	27.0%56
Langston Wilson	661	1,440	31.5%	4.154	114.364	110.240	52.0%54	34.4%64	15.4%58	31.0%54	48.4%58	67.4%44	12.8%22	26.7%56
Angelo Stuart	567	1,535	27.0%	-10.730	104.540	115.230	46.6%30	39.7%82	19.9%26	31.4%54	49.1%56	63.4%28	14.0%30	33.5%34
Learic Davis	476	1,626	22.6%	15.772	113.160	97.472	52.9%58	37.2%76	19.1%32	39.3%72	43.3%80	69.8%54	17.2%52	32.6%38
Aaron Franklin	471	1,630	22.4%	-10.730	108.248	118.922	48.5%38	41.5%86	20.4%24	35.0%64	56.0%24	65.9%36	16.0%44	29.7%46
Markeith Browning II	422	1,679	20.1%	-15.924	104.840	120.618	49.2%40	36.5%72	19.4%30	29.0%48	55.2%28	59.7%16	17.8%56	30.6%44
Dominic Ham	343	1,758	16.3%	3.252	109.552	106.350	51.5%52	34.3%64	17.2%44	34.2%62	51.6%44	67.9%44	17.7%56	24.8%62

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Pullian	1,478	623	70.4%	-3.540	105.742	109.244	49.6%42	34.6%66	19.1%32	31.2%54	47.4%64	65.3%34	13.3%26	26.9%56
Elijah Jamison	1,397	704	66.5%	-6.036	111.156	117.126	49.8%42	39.0%82	17.3%44	28.8%48	52.2%40	63.4%28	15.9%42	34.1%34
Erik Pratt	1,387	714	66.0%	-1.844	110.052	111.836	50.5%48	36.5%72	19.2%32	37.6%70	51.4%44	64.0%30	17.8%56	30.9%42
BJ Freeman	1,340	761	63.8%	0.848	109.350	108.644	50.8%48	41.3%86	20.5%24	35.5%64	49.6%54	67.8%44	16.1%44	29.6%46
Faizon Fields	1,088	1,013	51.8%	-0.246	112.860	113.134	51.7%54	35.8%70	16.5%50	28.0%44	51.6%44	65.8%36	15.6%40	28.1%52
Darius Duffy	684	1,417	32.6%	-0.346	109.552	109.742	50.2%46	35.7%70	18.1%38	36.0%66	49.6%54	67.1%42	16.0%44	33.9%34
Langston Wilson	661	1,440	31.5%	-1.144	110.454	111.538	51.3%50	38.4%80	19.3%30	34.2%62	51.6%44	65.4%36	17.7%54	34.1%34
Angelo Stuart	567	1,535	27.0%	4.754	114.364	109.642	53.4%60	36.1%72	17.4%44	33.9%60	51.1%46	67.2%42	16.8%50	30.8%44
Learic Davis	476	1,626	22.6%	-4.140	111.256	115.428	51.1%50	37.1%76	17.8%40	31.5%54	52.7%38	64.9%34	15.7%42	31.3%42
Aaron Franklin	471	1,630	22.4%	3.854	112.760	108.944	52.4%56	35.9%72	17.4%42	32.7%58	49.0%56	66.2%38	16.1%44	32.1%40
Markeith Browning II	422	1,679	20.1%	4.754	113.460	108.744	52.1%56	37.3%76	17.7%40	34.2%62	49.3%54	67.7%44	15.6%40	31.8%40
Dominic Ham	343	1,758	16.3%	0.046	112.158	112.136	51.5%52	37.7%78	18.3%38	33.0%58	50.3%48	65.8%36	15.7%42	32.9%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.