Milwaukee11-20

HorizonCoach: Bart Lundy

11-20NET#262

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Franklin	1,311	775	62.8%	+3.464	−2.836	−6.282	−0.446	−1.736	+0.834	−1.046	−3.482	+4.992	−1.428	−6.280
Stevie Elam	1,124	963	53.9%	+8.482	+3.672	−4.874	+0.658	+0.658	−1.370	+7.186	−0.656	−2.030	+4.898	−0.956
Isaiah Dorceus	1,114	972	53.4%	−1.246	−1.344	−0.150	−0.940	+2.978	−0.050	−4.228	−2.172	+4.388	−3.48	+4.824
Amar Augillard	1,084	1,003	51.9%	−11.714	−4.526	+7.214	−0.940	−4.018	+0.834	−2.538	+5.18	−4.016	+1.576	+0.150
Josh Dixon	1,000	1,087	47.9%	−7.124	+3.772	+10.86	+3.686	+0.860	+1.624	−1.146	+4.410	−2.526	−1.822	+3.132
Chandler Jackson	941	1,145	45.1%	+14.094	+10.694	−3.368	+4.892	+1.970	−0.658	+1.862	+1.136	+3.886	+2.688	+6.616
Esyah Pippa-White	930	1,157	44.6%	+8.480	+3.570	−4.976	−0.842	+0.254	−1.878	+8.190	−0.050	+3.080	+0.866	−4.976
Danilo Jovanovich	802	1,285	38.4%	+1.758	+1.156	−0.652	−1.436	+2.676	−1.878	−8.912	−0.858	+0.658	−0.640	+0.150
Faizon Fields	702	1,385	33.6%	−1.444	−7.416	−6.080	−2.326	−3.422	+0.934	+1.158	−4.790	+0.556	−1.132	−1.056
Sekou Konneh	662	1,424	31.7%	−6.228	−2.636	+3.628	+0.758	+0.960	+2.414	−1.244	+0.938	−0.050	−1.724	−8.188
Seth Hubbard	419	1,667	20.1%	−4.534	−2.040	+2.534	+0.354	−3.124	−0.760	+3.472	−1.364	−5.410	+0.662	+8.810
Tate Mackenzie	208	1,879	10.0%	−11.214	−9.810	+1.440	−6.96	+1.466	−1.370	−8.112	−2.676	−8.24	−3.38	−1.862
Simeon Murchison	129	1,958	6.2%	−8.222	+2.162	+10.36	−1.832	+2.776	+1.328	+7.386	+7.52	−6.46	+3.092	−0.956

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Franklin	1,311	775	62.8%	-5.136	107.942	113.036	49.8%36	32.5%60	15.4%52	32.0%46	54.4%34	72.7%62	15.3%44	33.8%44
Stevie Elam	1,124	963	53.9%	-2.442	110.650	113.036	50.2%42	33.4%66	14.5%60	35.7%56	55.3%30	70.0%48	18.0%64	35.5%40
Isaiah Dorceus	1,114	972	53.4%	-6.834	108.344	115.132	49.5%36	34.4%68	15.1%56	30.5%42	54.6%34	72.9%62	14.2%36	38.2%34
Amar Augillard	1,084	1,003	51.9%	-12.026	106.840	118.824	49.5%36	31.2%54	15.5%52	31.2%44	58.1%20	68.9%44	16.5%52	36.0%38
Josh Dixon	1,000	1,087	47.9%	-10.030	110.950	120.920	51.8%48	33.6%66	15.9%48	31.8%46	57.9%22	69.6%48	14.9%40	37.6%34
Chandler Jackson	941	1,145	45.1%	1.448	114.860	113.336	52.6%52	34.2%66	14.8%58	33.4%50	56.2%28	73.1%64	17.3%58	39.8%30
Esyah Pippa-White	930	1,157	44.6%	-1.642	110.950	112.538	49.5%36	33.3%62	14.1%64	37.0%60	55.5%30	72.6%62	16.2%50	33.3%46
Danilo Jovanovich	802	1,285	38.4%	-5.236	109.648	114.832	49.1%36	34.7%68	14.0%64	27.1%34	55.1%32	71.4%56	15.4%44	36.0%38
Faizon Fields	702	1,385	33.6%	-7.234	104.034	111.240	48.4%32	30.9%54	15.7%50	33.2%50	52.5%44	71.3%56	15.1%42	35.3%40
Sekou Konneh	662	1,424	31.7%	-10.528	107.240	117.626	50.4%42	33.8%66	16.8%42	31.6%46	56.2%28	70.9%54	14.7%38	30.6%54
Seth Hubbard	419	1,667	20.1%	-9.930	107.342	117.228	50.1%42	30.7%52	14.5%60	35.1%54	54.5%34	66.7%32	16.3%50	43.0%24
Tate Mackenzie	208	1,879	10.0%	-16.322	100.126	116.428	43.7%16	34.4%68	14.0%64	25.1%28	53.3%40	63.7%26	12.9%26	34.3%42
Simeon Murchison	129	1,958	6.2%	-13.924	110.950	124.914	48.2%32	35.7%72	16.3%46	39.3%64	62.6%10	64.9%28	18.6%68	35.1%40

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Aaron Franklin	1,311	775	62.8%	-8.532	110.750	119.224	50.1%42	34.2%66	14.6%60	33.0%50	57.8%22	67.8%40	16.7%54	40.0%30
Stevie Elam	1,124	963	53.9%	-10.828	107.040	117.826	49.6%36	32.8%62	15.8%50	28.6%38	55.9%28	72.0%60	13.2%28	36.5%38
Isaiah Dorceus	1,114	972	53.4%	-5.636	109.648	115.330	50.4%42	31.5%56	15.1%54	34.7%54	56.7%26	68.7%44	17.6%60	33.4%44
Amar Augillard	1,084	1,003	51.9%	-0.344	111.352	111.540	50.4%42	35.2%70	14.7%58	33.7%52	53.0%40	72.9%62	15.1%42	35.9%38
Josh Dixon	1,000	1,087	47.9%	-2.940	107.240	110.144	48.2%32	32.8%62	14.4%62	32.9%48	53.5%38	72.1%60	16.7%54	34.5%42
Chandler Jackson	941	1,145	45.1%	-12.526	104.134	116.728	47.8%30	32.3%60	15.4%52	31.6%46	55.1%32	69.3%46	14.6%38	33.2%46
Esyah Pippa-White	930	1,157	44.6%	-10.030	107.442	117.426	50.3%42	33.1%62	15.9%48	28.8%38	55.6%30	69.6%48	15.5%44	38.2%34
Danilo Jovanovich	802	1,285	38.4%	-6.934	108.544	115.430	50.5%42	32.1%60	15.8%50	36.0%56	55.8%28	70.7%52	16.0%50	35.9%38
Faizon Fields	702	1,385	33.6%	-5.836	111.452	117.228	50.7%42	34.3%68	14.8%58	32.0%46	57.2%24	70.8%52	16.2%50	36.3%38
Sekou Konneh	662	1,424	31.7%	-4.338	109.848	114.034	49.7%36	32.9%62	14.3%62	32.8%48	55.3%30	71.0%54	16.3%52	38.7%32
Seth Hubbard	419	1,667	20.1%	-5.436	109.346	114.732	49.9%36	33.8%66	15.2%54	31.7%46	55.8%28	72.0%60	15.7%46	34.3%44
Tate Mackenzie	208	1,879	10.0%	-5.136	109.948	115.132	50.7%42	33.0%62	15.2%54	33.3%50	55.8%28	71.9%58	16.1%50	36.2%38
Simeon Murchison	129	1,958	6.2%	-5.736	108.846	114.532	50.0%42	33.0%62	15.0%56	32.0%46	55.1%32	71.3%56	15.6%46	36.0%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.