Minnesota15-18

Big 10Coach: Niko Medved

15-18NET#84

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cade Tyson	1,791	215	89.3%	−5.430	+11.094	+16.40	+9.4100	−5.112	−1.472	+1.962	+5.56	−4.016	−5.62	−0.654
Isaac Asuma	1,704	302	84.9%	+7.278	+14.598	+7.312	+6.096	+0.456	−3.392	−9.010	+5.76	+0.960	−0.836	−5.678
Langston Reynolds	1,650	357	82.2%	−6.128	+0.856	+6.914	+3.988	−6.48	−0.252	−0.946	+2.326	−2.526	−0.150	−0.050
Bobby Durkin	1,630	377	81.2%	−11.214	−4.128	+7.014	+1.770	−9.52	−0.150	−13.74	+0.840	−9.42	−1.034	−8.086
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson	1,131	876	56.3%	+3.866	+0.252	−3.670	−4.214	+4.688	−1.370	+11.696	−2.778	+1.464	+0.866	+7.214
Grayson Grove	970	1,036	48.4%	+0.654	−1.642	−2.362	+2.374	−3.720	+0.246	−15.12	−1.666	−0.248	+0.254	−7.686
Kai Shinholster	605	1,402	30.2%	+1.456	−5.522	−6.984	−3.518	+1.162	+1.130	−4.528	−2.676	+0.456	+1.372	−4.474
Chansey Willis Jr.	287	1,719	14.3%	+5.772	−1.442	−7.186	−3.022	+10.0100	+2.812	+29.9100	−0.454	+8.8100	+1.678	+17.12
Robert Vaihola	156	1,850	7.8%	+22.7100	+11.496	−11.394	−4.612	+21.9100	−1.878	+15.8100	−0.858	+15.7100	−1.526	+4.824

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cade Tyson	1,791	215	89.3%	1.248	110.350	109.246	54.5%60	26.0%34	16.2%46	35.4%56	52.5%44	69.9%48	16.1%50	26.1%66
Isaac Asuma	1,704	302	84.9%	2.950	111.352	108.448	54.3%60	26.6%36	15.9%48	33.9%52	52.8%42	70.5%52	16.6%52	25.3%68
Langston Reynolds	1,650	357	82.2%	0.846	109.346	108.548	54.2%58	25.3%32	16.4%44	35.0%54	52.3%44	69.9%48	16.7%54	26.1%66
Bobby Durkin	1,630	377	81.2%	-0.344	108.444	108.746	53.8%56	24.7%28	16.4%44	32.6%48	52.0%44	68.6%44	16.5%52	24.7%70
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson	1,131	876	56.3%	3.552	109.246	105.754	51.7%46	28.5%44	15.8%50	40.3%66	50.7%52	71.0%54	17.0%56	29.4%56
Grayson Grove	970	1,036	48.4%	2.150	108.344	106.252	54.6%60	24.6%28	16.5%44	27.5%34	51.1%50	70.3%50	16.8%54	22.2%76
Kai Shinholster	605	1,402	30.2%	2.850	105.336	102.562	51.1%44	27.3%40	17.2%38	32.0%46	50.1%52	70.7%52	17.6%60	23.1%74
Chansey Willis Jr.	287	1,719	14.3%	6.758	108.042	101.366	50.9%44	35.1%70	18.8%28	61.1%92	51.5%48	77.9%80	18.1%64	40.9%28
Robert Vaihola	156	1,850	7.8%	22.782	119.772	96.974	49.3%36	46.6%96	14.7%58	49.6%82	51.1%50	84.8%94	15.3%44	30.5%54

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cade Tyson	1,791	215	89.3%	6.556	99.324	92.882	45.1%20	31.1%54	17.6%34	33.5%52	47.0%68	73.9%68	21.7%84	26.6%64
Isaac Asuma	1,704	302	84.9%	-4.338	96.920	101.266	48.3%32	26.3%34	19.2%26	42.9%70	47.0%68	69.6%48	17.4%60	30.9%52
Langston Reynolds	1,650	357	82.2%	6.958	108.544	101.664	50.3%42	31.7%58	16.5%44	35.9%56	50.0%58	72.4%62	16.7%54	26.2%66
Bobby Durkin	1,630	377	81.2%	10.864	112.554	101.764	52.1%50	34.2%66	16.4%44	46.3%78	51.3%48	78.1%82	17.4%60	32.7%46
Jaylen Crocker-Johnson	1,131	876	56.3%	-0.344	109.046	109.444	55.8%66	23.9%26	17.1%38	28.6%38	53.4%40	69.6%48	16.3%50	22.1%78
Grayson Grove	970	1,036	48.4%	1.548	109.948	108.448	52.4%50	28.3%44	16.3%46	42.6%70	52.7%42	70.5%52	16.6%54	29.8%56
Kai Shinholster	605	1,402	30.2%	1.448	110.850	109.444	54.5%60	26.2%34	16.1%48	36.6%58	52.7%42	70.2%50	16.3%50	27.5%62
Chansey Willis Jr.	287	1,719	14.3%	1.048	109.346	108.448	53.9%58	25.1%32	16.0%48	31.2%44	52.0%46	69.1%46	16.4%52	23.9%72
Robert Vaihola	156	1,850	7.8%	0.046	108.344	108.248	53.9%58	24.6%28	16.5%44	33.8%52	52.0%46	69.2%46	16.8%56	25.8%68

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.