SWAC

MVSUMississippi Valley St.

1-30NET#362Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #361Coach: George Ivory

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rayquan Brown	1,150	178	86.6%	+12.1—	+0.6—	−11.5—	−0.5—	+4.6—	+0.6—	+1.7—	−3.8—	−2.3—	+3.6—	−2.7—
Donovan Sanders	983	345	74.0%	−2.1—	+5.5—	+7.6—	−0.4—	+5.2—	−4.1—	−9.3—	+3.9—	−3.0—	−0.7—	−2.5—
Arecko Gipson	906	422	68.2%	+0.2—	+2.5—	+2.3—	+2.5—	−3.0—	−0.3—	+3.2—	+1.9—	+1.6—	−2.4—	−9.2—
Danny Washington	813	515	61.2%	+11.8—	+5.9—	−5.9—	+3.4—	+1.1—	+0.1—	−1.0—	−0.4—	+9.4—	−1.4—	+7.9—
Reginald Reynolds	535	793	40.3%	+2.5—	+5.2—	+2.7—	+5.3—	−9.8—	−3.4—	−2.5—	+2.9—	+0.6—	+1.7—	+2.0—
Walter Hamilton	473	854	35.6%	−2.5—	−5.0—	−2.5—	−6.8—	+8.7—	+0.1—	+1.1—	−2.2—	+3.9—	−4.2—	−3.0—
Ernest Minton	389	939	29.3%	+11.1—	+5.3—	−5.9—	−0.5—	+3.7—	−1.4—	+6.7—	−8.1—	−8.8—	+3.3—	+11.6—
George Ivory III	292	1,036	22.0%	−12.2—	−6.8—	+5.4—	+2.2—	−8.0—	+5.0—	−2.2—	+4.2—	−4.3—	+3.7—	+5.4—
Chidi Umeh	236	1,091	17.8%	−30.9—	−20.8—	+10.1—	−9.2—	−3.5—	+4.5—	−2.9—	+4.5—	−0.7—	−2.9—	−11.5—
Jordan Johnson	218	1,110	16.4%	+1.9—	−3.8—	−5.8—	−3.4—	−0.8—	−1.1—	−1.7—	−1.2—	+4.9—	+1.9—	+4.1—
Quorien Waldon	213	1,114	16.1%	−8.2—	−5.8—	+2.3—	+1.7—	−1.1—	+6.3—	−13.6—	−5.5—	−5.3—	−3.0—	−13.1—
Darrius Clark	203	1,125	15.3%	+7.3—	+8.1—	+0.8—	+4.1—	+2.1—	−1.6—	+8.4—	+1.2—	+0.6—	−0.6—	−1.0—
Kameron Mayhan	117	1,211	8.8%	−20.8—	−17.0—	+3.8—	−6.7—	−8.0—	+2.1—	+5.9—	−3.3—	−2.2—	−3.3—	+7.6—

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rayquan Brown	1,150	178	86.6%	-45.4—	78.1—	123.6—	40.3%—	32.5%—	28.1%—	28.9%—	56.8%—	58.6%—	17.5%—	37.9%—
Donovan Sanders	983	345	74.0%	-47.6—	79.5—	127.1—	40.2%—	33.1%—	27.0%—	26.5%—	58.3%—	58.1%—	16.8%—	37.7%—
Arecko Gipson	906	422	68.2%	-47.0—	78.8—	125.8—	41.2%—	30.9%—	27.9%—	29.7%—	57.9%—	59.4%—	16.2%—	35.5%—
Danny Washington	813	515	61.2%	-42.5—	80.3—	122.8—	41.7%—	32.3%—	28.0%—	28.3%—	57.1%—	62.6%—	16.4%—	41.6%—
Reginald Reynolds	535	793	40.3%	-45.6—	81.2—	126.7—	43.5%—	25.8%—	26.0%—	27.2%—	59.1%—	59.2%—	18.0%—	39.5%—
Walter Hamilton	473	854	35.6%	-48.7—	74.8—	123.5—	36.1%—	37.2%—	28.1%—	29.4%—	55.9%—	61.4%—	14.3%—	36.4%—
Ernest Minton	389	939	29.3%	-39.2—	81.8—	121.0—	40.0%—	34.5%—	27.0%—	33.3%—	51.6%—	52.9%—	19.3%—	46.5%—
George Ivory III	292	1,036	22.0%	-56.6—	72.7—	129.3—	42.1%—	25.4%—	31.9%—	26.9%—	60.6%—	55.5%—	19.8%—	42.6%—
Chidi Umeh	236	1,091	17.8%	-72.5—	60.9—	133.4—	32.7%—	29.0%—	31.7%—	26.3%—	60.9%—	58.3%—	14.6%—	29.0%—
Jordan Johnson	218	1,110	16.4%	-45.5—	74.8—	120.3—	37.5%—	31.3%—	27.1%—	27.3%—	56.3%—	63.1%—	18.5%—	41.8%—
Quorien Waldon	213	1,114	16.1%	-53.9—	73.1—	127.1—	41.7%—	30.9%—	33.3%—	17.2%—	52.8%—	54.6%—	14.5%—	27.6%—
Darrius Clark	203	1,125	15.3%	-40.9—	84.9—	125.8—	43.8%—	33.6%—	26.7%—	35.8%—	58.3%—	59.4%—	16.5%—	37.4%—
Kameron Mayhan	117	1,211	8.8%	-66.0—	62.5—	128.6—	34.1%—	24.6%—	30.0%—	34.1%—	54.3%—	56.9%—	14.0%—	45.2%—

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Rayquan Brown	1,150	178	86.6%	-57.6—	77.5—	135.1—	40.7%—	27.9%—	27.5%—	27.1%—	60.6%—	60.9%—	13.9%—	40.6%—
Donovan Sanders	983	345	74.0%	-45.5—	74.0—	119.5—	40.7%—	27.9%—	31.0%—	35.8%—	54.4%—	61.1%—	17.5%—	40.1%—
Arecko Gipson	906	422	68.2%	-47.2—	76.4—	123.6—	38.6%—	33.8%—	28.2%—	26.5%—	56.0%—	57.8%—	18.6%—	44.7%—
Danny Washington	813	515	61.2%	-54.2—	74.4—	128.7—	38.2%—	31.2%—	28.0%—	29.2%—	57.6%—	53.2%—	17.8%—	33.6%—
Reginald Reynolds	535	793	40.3%	-48.1—	75.9—	124.0—	38.2%—	35.6%—	29.4%—	29.6%—	56.2%—	58.7%—	16.3%—	37.5%—
Walter Hamilton	473	854	35.6%	-46.2—	79.8—	126.0—	42.9%—	28.5%—	28.0%—	28.2%—	58.1%—	57.5%—	18.5%—	39.4%—
Ernest Minton	389	939	29.3%	-50.3—	76.5—	126.8—	40.5%—	30.7%—	28.4%—	26.7%—	59.7%—	61.7%—	16.0%—	34.9%—
George Ivory III	292	1,036	22.0%	-44.4—	79.5—	123.9—	39.9%—	33.4%—	26.9%—	29.1%—	56.4%—	59.8%—	16.2%—	37.1%—
Chidi Umeh	236	1,091	17.8%	-41.5—	81.7—	123.3—	41.9%—	32.5%—	27.2%—	29.1%—	56.5%—	59.0%—	17.5%—	40.5%—
Jordan Johnson	218	1,110	16.4%	-47.4—	78.7—	126.1—	40.9%—	32.0%—	28.2%—	28.9%—	57.5%—	58.2%—	16.7%—	37.7%—
Quorien Waldon	213	1,114	16.1%	-45.8—	79.0—	124.7—	40.1%—	32.0%—	27.0%—	30.8%—	58.3%—	59.9%—	17.5%—	40.7%—
Darrius Clark	203	1,125	15.3%	-48.2—	76.8—	125.0—	39.7%—	31.6%—	28.3%—	27.4%—	57.1%—	58.8%—	17.1%—	38.5%—
Kameron Mayhan	117	1,211	8.8%	-45.3—	79.5—	124.8—	40.9%—	32.6%—	27.8%—	28.2%—	57.6%—	59.1%—	17.3%—	37.6%—

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.