Nebraska Omaha12-17

SummitCoach: Chris Crutchfield

12-17NET#259

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tony Osburn	1,462	458	76.2%	−12.014	−1.542	+10.56	+0.758	−5.610	−1.472	−1.544	+6.14	−6.08	+2.386	−8.688
Lance Waddles	1,380	540	71.9%	−6.228	−2.736	+3.528	+0.052	−1.042	+0.834	−9.78	+0.444	−5.98	−1.624	−1.860
Grant Stubblefield	1,235	685	64.3%	+13.192	+3.772	−9.490	+1.466	−3.322	−2.282	+6.082	−3.282	−0.248	+3.996	−1.962
Ja'Sean Glover	1,120	800	58.3%	−1.346	−1.840	−0.552	−1.634	+0.254	+1.822	+14.798	−0.960	+1.768	+0.254	+9.210
Paul Djobet	1,008	912	52.5%	+13.892	+5.780	−8.188	+1.668	−0.546	−2.988	−1.840	−3.280	+4.790	−1.032	+1.044
Kamryn Thomas	856	1,064	44.6%	+6.474	+5.982	−0.552	+0.860	+4.086	−0.760	+4.978	−1.768	+2.072	−3.010	−1.962
Brock Scholl	661	1,259	34.5%	−15.58	−12.86	+2.732	−9.42	+3.280	−1.572	−12.34	+1.830	+0.252	+0.154	−6.882
Christian Richardson	548	1,372	28.5%	+13.692	+3.470	−10.292	+7.9100	+4.688	+6.50	−3.034	−4.488	+6.596	+0.968	+7.014
Valentino Simon	527	1,393	27.4%	+2.260	+4.776	+2.534	+4.992	−0.744	+0.244	−3.134	+1.038	−0.644	−0.934	−0.552
Khamani Cooper	521	1,399	27.2%	−12.412	−2.138	+10.36	−2.228	+2.072	+0.542	−2.140	+5.94	−0.148	−0.248	+2.236
Julian Margrave	250	1,670	13.0%	−13.610	−5.124	+8.510	−3.022	−8.84	−1.168	+5.882	+3.416	−9.32	+0.660	+1.540

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tony Osburn	1,462	458	76.2%	-8.032	106.940	114.832	52.0%50	24.0%26	15.5%52	35.2%54	53.9%36	69.8%48	14.5%38	31.6%50
Lance Waddles	1,380	540	71.9%	-6.734	106.540	113.236	51.9%48	25.1%32	16.0%48	32.9%48	52.5%42	69.8%48	13.5%30	33.2%46
Grant Stubblefield	1,235	685	64.3%	-0.344	108.544	108.846	52.4%50	24.2%28	15.0%56	37.7%60	51.2%50	71.3%56	15.4%44	33.0%46
Ja'Sean Glover	1,120	800	58.3%	-5.536	106.540	112.038	51.2%44	25.4%32	16.5%44	41.9%70	52.0%46	72.1%60	14.0%34	37.6%34
Paul Djobet	1,008	912	52.5%	1.648	110.048	108.448	52.6%52	25.1%32	14.4%60	34.7%54	50.9%50	73.6%66	13.5%30	34.2%44
Kamryn Thomas	856	1,064	44.6%	-1.542	110.550	111.940	52.3%50	27.6%40	15.4%52	38.3%62	51.5%48	72.5%62	12.3%24	32.7%46
Brock Scholl	661	1,259	34.5%	-15.122	98.924	114.034	45.9%24	27.3%40	14.8%58	27.8%36	53.6%38	71.5%58	14.1%34	29.2%58
Christian Richardson	548	1,372	28.5%	4.854	109.748	104.956	57.6%74	28.8%46	20.4%18	33.3%50	49.2%58	76.0%74	14.6%38	38.8%32
Valentino Simon	527	1,393	27.4%	-3.440	110.750	114.134	55.4%64	24.8%28	15.9%48	33.3%50	53.1%40	71.0%54	13.3%30	33.3%44
Khamani Cooper	521	1,399	27.2%	-14.024	105.738	119.722	50.2%42	26.8%38	16.1%46	34.0%52	56.7%26	71.3%56	13.9%32	35.3%40
Julian Margrave	250	1,670	13.0%	-16.820	102.832	119.622	49.2%36	17.7%12	14.8%58	40.6%66	55.4%30	63.3%24	14.5%38	35.0%42

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Tony Osburn	1,462	458	76.2%	4.052	108.444	104.458	51.3%44	29.6%48	16.8%40	36.6%58	47.8%66	75.8%74	12.3%24	40.2%28
Lance Waddles	1,380	540	71.9%	-0.544	109.246	109.744	51.8%48	26.1%34	15.2%54	42.6%70	52.1%44	75.7%74	15.1%42	35.0%42
Grant Stubblefield	1,235	685	64.3%	-13.424	104.936	118.226	51.0%44	27.4%40	17.2%38	31.7%46	54.5%34	71.5%58	11.5%18	34.9%42
Ja'Sean Glover	1,120	800	58.3%	-4.338	108.344	112.538	52.7%52	25.3%32	14.8%58	27.3%34	53.0%40	70.4%52	13.9%32	28.4%60
Paul Djobet	1,008	912	52.5%	-12.226	104.234	116.428	51.0%44	25.6%32	17.3%38	36.5%58	54.1%36	68.9%44	14.5%38	33.2%46
Kamryn Thomas	856	1,064	44.6%	-7.832	104.636	112.538	51.5%46	23.6%26	16.1%48	33.3%50	53.2%40	70.4%52	15.3%44	34.6%42
Brock Scholl	661	1,259	34.5%	0.346	111.652	111.340	55.4%64	24.1%28	16.3%46	40.1%66	51.8%46	71.3%56	13.9%34	36.0%38
Christian Richardson	548	1,372	28.5%	-8.930	106.338	115.132	49.7%36	24.2%28	13.9%64	36.4%58	53.6%38	69.5%48	13.7%32	31.8%50
Valentino Simon	527	1,393	27.4%	-5.636	106.038	111.540	50.5%42	25.5%32	15.7%50	36.4%58	52.1%44	71.5%58	14.2%36	33.8%44
Khamani Cooper	521	1,399	27.2%	-1.642	107.842	109.444	52.5%52	24.8%28	15.7%50	36.1%58	50.8%50	71.4%56	14.0%34	33.1%46
Julian Margrave	250	1,670	13.0%	-3.240	107.942	111.140	52.2%50	26.5%36	15.9%48	34.8%54	52.0%46	72.6%62	13.9%34	33.5%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

Nebraska OmahaOmaha12-17

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

Nebraska Omaha12-17