Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 10
Nebraska logo

Nebraska

28-7NET#13Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #75Coach: Fred Hoiberg
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Pryce Sandfort+19.4+16.1−3.3+6.0+1.3−4.0+0.3−1.2+1.3+0.8+3.5
Sam Hoiberg+13.3+2.0−11.4+3.9−4.6−1.5−14.4−5.8+9.8−1.7+3.9
Rienk Mast+1.5+4.2+2.7+0.3+5.6−1.7−6.4+1.7+5.7−3.7−8.2
Jamarques Lawrence+1.0+3.7+2.7−1.6+3.3−3.4−1.1+2.3+3.7−2.8−2.7
Braden Frager+5.5+10.7+5.2+6.9−2.6+0.4+11.0+2.6−0.8+0.0+2.6
Berke Buyuktuncel−0.3−5.0−4.7−3.4+0.5+0.4−6.7+0.0+1.7+3.4−2.8
Cale Jacobsen−3.5−6.4−2.8−3.5−2.7+0.7+6.7−1.1−4.4+3.9+4.8
Jared Garcia−16.6−11.4+5.1−2.3+0.1+5.4+5.1−0.6−6.6−1.0+4.1
Connor Essegian+14.5+8.3−6.2+4.9+1.5−1.5−4.0+1.0+5.1+2.5−9.3
Leo Curtis−26.7−16.9+9.8−10.0+1.3+3.2+2.6+3.2−11.9+0.9+0.2
Kendall Blue−54.8−37.2+17.6−13.8−4.7+11.1+0.0−0.6−20.4−5.2−3.1

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Pryce Sandfort20.1118.197.956.7%26.9%13.7%26.3%48.2%72.8%18.8%25.9%
Sam Hoiberg19.6115.896.256.5%25.7%14.1%23.4%47.2%74.5%18.3%26.1%
Rienk Mast17.4116.799.355.9%28.4%13.9%24.4%48.9%74.3%17.5%22.9%
Jamarques Lawrence17.2116.599.355.3%27.6%13.3%25.9%49.1%73.8%17.8%24.5%
Braden Frager19.2120.0100.858.9%25.5%14.6%31.2%49.6%72.2%18.7%26.4%
Berke Buyuktuncel16.7113.196.454.3%26.9%14.6%23.3%48.4%73.4%20.2%24.0%
Cale Jacobsen15.1112.197.154.0%25.3%14.8%29.7%47.8%70.4%20.6%27.8%
Jared Garcia3.2105.9102.753.8%26.8%18.9%30.5%47.9%67.2%17.8%28.7%
Connor Essegian30.3123.192.860.3%28.0%13.0%22.5%49.3%77.3%21.0%16.7%
Leo Curtis-8.699.2107.846.3%27.9%17.5%28.7%51.4%61.3%19.5%25.5%
Kendall Blue-35.479.8115.242.5%22.2%25.0%26.3%47.8%53.4%13.7%22.4%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Pryce Sandfort0.7102.0101.350.8%25.6%17.7%26.0%49.4%71.5%18.0%22.4%
Sam Hoiberg6.2113.8107.652.6%30.3%15.6%37.8%53.0%64.8%20.0%22.2%
Rienk Mast15.8112.496.655.6%22.7%15.6%30.8%47.2%68.6%21.2%31.1%
Jamarques Lawrence16.2112.896.656.9%24.3%16.8%27.0%46.8%70.1%20.6%27.2%
Braden Frager13.7109.295.652.0%28.1%14.2%20.1%47.0%73.0%18.7%23.9%
Berke Buyuktuncel17.0118.2101.157.7%26.4%14.2%30.0%48.4%71.7%16.8%26.9%
Cale Jacobsen18.6118.599.957.4%28.0%14.0%23.0%49.0%74.8%16.7%23.0%
Jared Garcia19.8117.497.656.2%26.7%13.5%25.4%48.5%73.8%18.9%24.6%
Connor Essegian15.8114.799.055.4%26.6%14.5%26.5%48.3%72.2%18.5%26.0%
Leo Curtis18.2116.298.056.2%26.6%14.3%26.1%48.2%73.2%18.6%25.3%
Kendall Blue19.4117.197.756.3%26.9%13.9%26.2%48.5%73.8%18.9%25.5%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.