Nebraska28-7

Big 10Coach: Fred Hoiberg

28-7NET#13

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Pryce Sandfort	1,922	383	83.4%	+19.498	+16.1100	−3.368	+6.096	+1.364	−4.094	+0.354	−1.262	+1.364	+0.866	+3.530
Sam Hoiberg	1,837	468	79.7%	+13.392	+2.062	−11.494	+3.988	−4.614	−1.572	−14.44	−5.894	+9.8100	−1.724	+3.928
Rienk Mast	1,606	699	69.7%	+1.556	+4.274	+2.734	+0.354	+5.692	−1.776	−6.418	+1.730	+5.794	−3.76	−8.288
Jamarques Lawrence	1,596	709	69.2%	+1.056	+3.772	+2.732	−1.634	+3.382	−3.492	−1.146	+2.324	+3.786	−2.812	−2.766
Braden Frager	1,319	986	57.2%	+5.572	+10.794	+5.220	+6.998	−2.628	+0.442	+11.096	+2.622	−0.842	+0.052	+2.634
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,269	1,036	55.1%	−0.350	−5.024	−4.774	−3.420	+0.556	+0.442	−6.718	+0.048	+1.768	+3.494	−2.866
Cale Jacobsen	1,130	1,175	49.0%	−3.538	−6.420	−2.866	−3.518	−2.728	+0.736	+6.784	−1.162	−4.414	+3.996	+4.824
Jared Garcia	397	1,908	17.2%	−16.68	−11.48	+5.120	−2.326	+0.152	+5.42	+5.178	−0.656	−6.66	−1.032	+4.126
Connor Essegian	177	2,128	7.7%	+14.594	+8.390	−6.282	+4.992	+1.566	−1.574	−4.030	+1.038	+5.192	+2.588	−9.390
Leo Curtis	109	2,196	4.7%	−26.72	−16.92	+9.86	−10.02	+1.364	+3.28	+2.666	+3.218	−11.92	+0.968	+0.248
Kendall Blue	104	2,201	4.5%	−54.80	−37.22	+17.60	−13.82	−4.714	+11.10	+0.052	−0.656	−20.40	−5.22	−3.168

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Pryce Sandfort	1,922	383	83.4%	20.178	118.168	97.972	56.7%70	26.9%38	13.7%66	26.3%30	48.2%64	72.8%62	18.8%70	25.9%66
Sam Hoiberg	1,837	468	79.7%	19.678	115.864	96.276	56.5%70	25.7%32	14.1%62	23.4%24	47.2%68	74.5%68	18.3%66	26.1%66
Rienk Mast	1,606	699	69.7%	17.474	116.766	99.370	55.9%66	28.4%44	13.9%64	24.4%26	48.9%60	74.3%68	17.5%60	22.9%76
Jamarques Lawrence	1,596	709	69.2%	17.274	116.564	99.370	55.3%64	27.6%40	13.3%68	25.9%30	49.1%58	73.8%66	17.8%62	24.5%70
Braden Frager	1,319	986	57.2%	19.276	120.072	100.866	58.9%78	25.5%32	14.6%60	31.2%44	49.6%58	72.2%60	18.7%68	26.4%66
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,269	1,036	55.1%	16.774	113.156	96.476	54.3%58	26.9%38	14.6%60	23.3%22	48.4%62	73.4%66	20.2%78	24.0%72
Cale Jacobsen	1,130	1,175	49.0%	15.170	112.154	97.174	54.0%58	25.3%32	14.8%58	29.7%40	47.8%64	70.4%50	20.6%78	27.8%62
Jared Garcia	397	1,908	17.2%	3.252	105.938	102.762	53.8%56	26.8%38	18.9%28	30.5%42	47.9%64	67.2%38	17.8%62	28.7%58
Connor Essegian	177	2,128	7.7%	30.388	123.178	92.882	60.3%82	28.0%42	13.0%70	22.5%22	49.3%58	77.3%80	21.0%80	16.7%90
Leo Curtis	109	2,196	4.7%	-8.632	99.224	107.848	46.3%24	27.9%42	17.5%36	28.7%38	51.4%48	61.3%18	19.5%74	25.5%68
Kendall Blue	104	2,201	4.5%	-35.48	79.84	115.232	42.5%14	22.2%22	25.0%4	26.3%30	47.8%64	53.4%6	13.7%32	22.4%76

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Pryce Sandfort	1,922	383	83.4%	0.746	102.030	101.366	50.8%42	25.6%32	17.7%34	26.0%30	49.4%58	71.5%58	18.0%64	22.4%76
Sam Hoiberg	1,837	468	79.7%	6.256	113.858	107.650	52.6%52	30.3%52	15.6%52	37.8%62	53.0%40	64.8%28	20.0%76	22.2%76
Rienk Mast	1,606	699	69.7%	15.872	112.454	96.674	55.6%66	22.7%22	15.6%52	30.8%44	47.2%68	68.6%44	21.2%82	31.1%52
Jamarques Lawrence	1,596	709	69.2%	16.272	112.856	96.674	56.9%72	24.3%28	16.8%42	27.0%34	46.8%70	70.1%50	20.6%78	27.2%64
Braden Frager	1,319	986	57.2%	13.768	109.246	95.676	52.0%48	28.1%42	14.2%62	20.1%16	47.0%68	73.0%64	18.7%68	23.9%72
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,269	1,036	55.1%	17.074	118.268	101.166	57.7%74	26.4%36	14.2%62	30.0%42	48.4%62	71.7%58	16.8%54	26.9%64
Cale Jacobsen	1,130	1,175	49.0%	18.676	118.570	99.968	57.4%74	28.0%42	14.0%64	23.0%22	49.0%60	74.8%70	16.7%54	23.0%76
Jared Garcia	397	1,908	17.2%	19.878	117.466	97.672	56.2%68	26.7%36	13.5%68	25.4%28	48.5%62	73.8%66	18.9%70	24.6%70
Connor Essegian	177	2,128	7.7%	15.872	114.760	99.070	55.4%64	26.6%36	14.5%60	26.5%32	48.3%62	72.2%60	18.5%68	26.0%66
Leo Curtis	109	2,196	4.7%	18.276	116.264	98.072	56.2%68	26.6%36	14.3%62	26.1%30	48.2%64	73.2%64	18.6%68	25.3%68
Kendall Blue	104	2,201	4.5%	19.478	117.166	97.772	56.3%68	26.9%38	13.9%64	26.2%30	48.5%62	73.8%66	18.9%70	25.5%68

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.