Niagara7-22

MAACCoach: Greg Paulus

7-22NET#340

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Reggie Prudhomme	1,125	612	64.8%	+4.568	+9.192	+4.624	+4.892	−1.834	−3.994	−6.020	+0.938	−0.940	−1.428	+3.828
Justin Hawkins	1,105	631	63.7%	+8.080	+7.788	−0.352	+7.398	−5.610	−0.964	−5.622	−0.960	+1.364	−1.130	+1.640
Vice Zanki	918	819	52.8%	+5.572	−1.144	−6.684	+3.080	−5.410	+1.328	+0.052	−0.858	+4.892	+1.374	−4.876
Justin Page	876	861	50.4%	−19.54	−6.020	+13.52	−4.214	−5.410	−2.686	−1.344	+6.82	−4.812	−0.248	+7.114
Josiah Sabino	867	869	49.9%	−0.548	−6.618	−6.182	−4.612	+3.180	+2.812	+6.282	−4.186	−4.016	+1.778	−1.458
Trenton Walters	844	892	48.6%	−1.246	−1.344	−0.150	−0.446	−2.330	+1.524	+2.868	−2.070	+3.986	−2.216	+6.316
Will Shortt	822	914	47.4%	−1.844	−3.234	−1.458	−0.644	+5.390	+2.712	−12.44	−1.464	+3.986	−2.316	−1.860
Landon Williams	806	930	46.4%	+8.080	+1.760	−6.282	+1.164	+2.676	−0.760	−5.722	−3.986	+2.374	−0.836	−6.984
Brian Griffith	497	1,240	28.6%	+0.854	+3.972	+3.132	+0.658	+2.072	+0.442	+15.1100	+1.334	−7.16	+2.082	+0.746
Kabeya Tshibangu	376	1,361	21.6%	−0.648	+1.560	+2.136	−1.534	−1.340	−2.584	+3.872	+3.118	−3.818	+2.184	+0.546
Drew Larson	338	1,398	19.5%	−15.48	−13.74	+1.638	−8.64	+6.394	+3.38	+2.666	+3.018	+1.466	+1.678	−2.766

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Reggie Prudhomme	1,125	612	64.8%	-12.926	102.932	115.830	52.5%52	24.0%26	17.9%34	24.7%26	53.6%38	66.4%32	16.2%50	35.0%42
Justin Hawkins	1,105	631	63.7%	-11.628	102.530	114.134	53.5%56	22.5%22	18.9%26	24.7%26	52.9%42	67.2%38	16.3%50	34.3%42
Vice Zanki	918	819	52.8%	-11.926	99.224	111.142	52.3%50	22.0%20	19.8%22	26.7%32	52.9%42	69.1%46	17.3%60	31.4%50
Justin Page	876	861	50.4%	-24.214	96.720	120.920	48.8%34	22.0%20	17.9%34	26.1%30	56.7%26	64.2%26	16.6%54	37.3%36
Josiah Sabino	867	869	49.9%	-14.724	96.420	111.140	48.5%32	26.2%34	20.6%18	29.9%40	51.2%50	64.8%28	17.5%60	33.0%46
Trenton Walters	844	892	48.6%	-15.122	99.024	114.134	50.7%42	23.5%24	20.0%20	28.2%36	52.2%44	68.8%44	15.5%46	37.1%36
Will Shortt	822	914	47.4%	-15.522	98.022	113.536	50.6%42	27.4%40	20.7%18	20.4%16	52.6%42	68.7%44	15.5%46	32.8%46
Landon Williams	806	930	46.4%	-10.328	100.626	110.942	51.5%46	26.0%34	18.9%28	23.7%24	51.2%50	68.0%40	16.3%50	30.1%54
Brian Griffith	497	1,240	28.6%	-14.024	102.430	116.428	51.3%44	26.1%34	19.5%24	37.7%60	54.2%36	61.6%18	18.2%64	34.2%44
Kabeya Tshibangu	376	1,361	21.6%	-15.022	100.928	115.830	49.7%36	23.6%26	17.3%38	29.7%40	55.7%30	63.8%26	18.4%66	34.2%44
Drew Larson	338	1,398	19.5%	-26.912	88.610	115.530	44.0%16	29.6%48	21.9%12	28.8%38	55.7%30	67.9%40	18.0%64	31.6%50

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Reggie Prudhomme	1,125	612	64.8%	-17.420	93.816	111.240	47.7%30	25.8%34	21.7%14	30.7%42	52.7%42	67.4%38	17.6%62	31.2%52
Justin Hawkins	1,105	631	63.7%	-19.618	94.818	114.434	46.3%24	28.1%42	19.8%22	30.3%42	53.8%38	65.9%32	17.4%60	32.7%46
Vice Zanki	918	819	52.8%	-17.420	100.326	117.726	49.4%36	27.4%40	18.6%30	26.7%32	53.7%38	64.3%26	16.0%50	36.2%38
Justin Page	876	861	50.4%	-4.738	102.732	107.450	53.0%52	27.4%40	20.6%18	27.4%34	49.9%58	69.0%46	16.8%56	30.2%54
Josiah Sabino	867	869	49.9%	-14.224	103.032	117.228	53.1%54	23.1%24	17.8%34	23.7%24	55.3%30	68.8%44	15.9%48	34.5%42
Trenton Walters	844	892	48.6%	-13.924	100.326	114.234	51.1%44	25.7%32	18.5%30	25.4%28	54.2%36	64.9%28	17.8%62	30.7%54
Will Shortt	822	914	47.4%	-13.724	101.228	114.932	51.2%44	22.1%20	17.9%34	32.7%48	53.9%36	64.9%28	17.8%62	34.6%42
Landon Williams	806	930	46.4%	-18.318	98.924	117.128	50.3%42	23.4%24	19.6%24	29.5%40	55.1%32	65.6%32	17.1%58	37.0%36
Brian Griffith	497	1,240	28.6%	-14.824	98.624	113.336	50.7%42	24.1%28	19.1%26	22.6%22	52.9%42	68.7%44	16.1%50	33.6%44
Kabeya Tshibangu	376	1,361	21.6%	-14.424	99.424	113.734	51.2%44	24.9%28	19.8%22	25.9%30	52.6%42	67.6%38	16.2%50	33.6%44
Drew Larson	338	1,398	19.5%	-11.528	102.430	113.934	52.6%52	23.3%24	18.6%30	26.2%30	52.7%42	66.5%32	16.4%52	34.2%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.