MAC

Northern Illinois

6-25NET#343Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #310Coach: Rashon Burno

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,186	996	-9.3—	99.3—	108.6—	49.1%—	20.6%—	16.1%—	29.7%—	51.6%—	69.4%—	17.9%—	42.3%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadMcPhersonQ. McPherson	147	67	-9.3—	107.7—	116.9—	54.5%—	20.9%—	16.4%—	23.6%—	55.1%—	62.5%—	19.5%—	46.2%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.	127	65	43.4—	123.1—	79.7—	63.7%—	30.9%—	18.1%—	29.2%—	38.9%—	80.6%—	22.2%—	43.2%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMottJ. Mott	105	47	59.5—	125.0—	65.5—	54.5%—	38.6%—	11.5%—	28.7%—	35.0%—	88.9%—	26.6%—	40.0%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.SotirovT. Sotirov	92	46	0.5—	110.3—	109.8—	58.0%—	13.6%—	15.3%—	24.0%—	55.9%—	67.4%—	19.0%—	43.4%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMcPhersonQ. McPherson	83	40	-22.1—	98.3—	120.5—	50.0%—	24.5%—	18.0%—	38.2%—	61.5%—	70.3%—	19.5%—	52.3%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMuhammadN. MuhammadSotirovT. Sotirov	82	36	-23.2—	88.2—	111.4—	45.6%—	14.0%—	15.9%—	23.5%—	50.7%—	75.0%—	12.0%—	29.7%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadMcPhersonQ. McPhersonSotirovT. Sotirov	77	37	15.6—	117.1—	101.5—	52.3%—	17.5%—	7.8%—	41.5%—	41.3%—	73.5%—	8.1%—	36.2%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.SotirovT. Sotirov	71	36	-26.2—	92.9—	119.2—	46.5%—	14.3%—	15.5%—	33.3%—	55.1%—	70.6%—	13.2%—	35.6%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsSotirovT. Sotirov	70	32	-22.1—	79.0—	101.1—	37.7%—	18.2%—	18.7%—	28.1%—	48.3%—	54.3%—	26.8%—	18.3%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMuhammadN. MuhammadMottJ. Mott	68	30	-13.4—	89.7—	103.1—	46.1%—	11.4%—	16.2%—	41.2%—	48.2%—	62.2%—	20.6%—	44.6%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMcPhersonQ. McPhersonSotirovT. Sotirov	57	26	-17.8—	95.0—	112.8—	52.0%—	20.0%—	17.6%—	12.0%—	55.4%—	66.7%—	18.8%—	28.3%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.SotirovT. SotirovTiptonS. Tipton	56	22	33.3—	117.8—	84.5—	54.3%—	17.9%—	10.7%—	41.3%—	32.4%—	83.9%—	11.5%—	105.9%—
ButlerE. ButlerDent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.	54	27	-29.7—	95.9—	125.6—	43.9%—	15.2%—	9.2%—	22.4%—	57.8%—	63.0%—	17.9%—	28.9%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadMcPhersonQ. McPhersonMottJ. Mott	53	24	-41.0—	80.9—	122.0—	36.9%—	13.3%—	15.1%—	35.7%—	55.6%—	70.0%—	14.6%—	51.1%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMuhammadN. MuhammadSotirovT. SotirovTiptonS. Tipton	51	21	-15.6—	126.9—	142.5—	64.8%—	15.0%—	9.8%—	25.0%—	67.1%—	72.2%—	10.6%—	50.0%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMcPhersonQ. McPhersonSotirovT. Sotirov	50	26	-0.9—	105.3—	106.2—	51.0%—	18.8%—	9.9%—	14.6%—	59.3%—	70.8%—	22.4%—	27.9%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsSotirovT. SotirovTiptonS. Tipton	49	22	-24.9—	81.3—	106.2—	43.4%—	3.7%—	12.2%—	34.2%—	54.4%—	77.3%—	20.8%—	55.9%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesNichollsK. NichollsMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.MottJ. Mott	40	18	-15.2—	90.3—	105.5—	42.1%—	12.5%—	5.0%—	15.8%—	53.1%—	72.2%—	21.6%—	37.5%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.McPhersonQ. McPhersonSotirovT. Sotirov	33	16	-38.9—	76.2—	115.1—	38.5%—	15.8%—	18.3%—	30.8%—	51.7%—	70.6%—	9.6%—	31.0%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.JonesQ. JonesMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.McPhersonQ. McPhersonMottJ. Mott	32	15	-26.6—	84.9—	111.5—	40.4%—	27.8%—	22.0%—	30.8%—	50.0%—	57.9%—	18.6%—	30.0%—
Dent Jr.J. Dent Jr.NichollsK. NichollsMunden Jr.J. Munden Jr.MottJ. MottTiptonS. Tipton	31	15	-20.0—	84.1—	104.1—	52.2%—	23.1%—	29.1%—	17.4%—	54.8%—	72.7%—	25.2%—	57.1%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.