Northwestern17-16

Big 10Coach: Chris Collins

17-16NET#52

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Martinelli	1,997	160	92.6%	+1.858	+0.856	−1.054	−3.022	+3.180	−3.190	+0.556	−2.274	−5.110	+1.678	−14.196
Ty Berry	1,589	569	73.6%	−14.010	−10.010	+4.028	+0.152	−7.34	+1.132	−6.916	+3.218	−3.222	+0.966	−1.356
Matthew Nicholson	1,299	858	60.2%	+7.880	−6.720	−14.596	−1.932	−2.926	−0.252	−5.224	−6.796	+1.466	+3.192	−7.284
Justin Mullins	1,173	985	54.4%	+5.672	+4.474	−1.256	+1.466	+0.354	−0.252	+5.682	+0.940	+7.298	−1.428	+2.534
Jalen Leach	1,161	996	53.8%	+6.676	+8.088	+1.442	+1.770	+2.070	−2.382	+0.554	−0.250	−4.812	+0.152	−7.184
Brooks Barnhizer	1,008	1,149	46.7%	−1.346	+2.264	+3.530	−1.138	+1.868	−0.964	+2.366	+0.642	−2.230	−1.232	−3.468
K.J. Windham	752	1,405	34.9%	+9.384	+1.158	−8.286	+0.556	−2.926	−0.862	+4.176	−4.790	−0.250	+2.890	+14.04
Angelo Ciaravino	537	1,620	24.9%	+4.670	+3.770	−1.054	−1.238	+8.498	+1.034	−1.642	−0.858	+3.784	−0.640	+7.414
Luke Hunger	476	1,681	22.1%	−7.724	−2.936	+4.824	−2.724	+3.078	+0.444	−5.322	+7.02	+6.096	−0.544	−2.464
Jordan Clayton	366	1,791	17.0%	−8.922	−11.08	−2.162	+1.062	−8.62	+2.416	−4.328	−1.364	+3.180	−1.132	−2.262
Keenan Fitzmorris	310	1,847	14.4%	−17.06	+2.566	+19.50	+5.394	−0.546	+2.912	−8.112	+5.26	−10.62	−4.06	−1.156

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Martinelli	1,997	160	92.6%	5.356	110.854	105.654	49.6%40	34.0%62	15.0%62	31.4%54	49.8%56	66.1%38	20.4%72	35.5%32
Ty Berry	1,589	569	73.6%	1.450	108.148	106.750	49.9%40	31.8%54	15.5%58	29.5%48	50.8%50	65.7%36	20.5%72	36.2%30
Matthew Nicholson	1,299	858	60.2%	8.262	108.148	99.968	49.1%38	32.7%58	15.2%60	29.3%48	47.3%66	67.0%42	21.5%78	33.7%38
Justin Mullins	1,173	985	54.4%	7.760	112.858	105.154	50.5%46	34.0%62	15.2%60	33.9%60	50.3%50	69.9%54	19.7%68	37.7%28
Jalen Leach	1,161	996	53.8%	8.162	114.562	106.352	50.6%46	34.7%66	14.2%68	31.6%54	49.8%54	64.4%32	20.3%72	33.3%38
Brooks Barnhizer	1,008	1,149	46.7%	4.454	111.956	107.548	49.2%38	34.7%66	14.8%64	32.5%58	50.2%50	65.4%36	19.7%68	34.8%34
K.J. Windham	752	1,405	34.9%	11.166	111.556	100.466	50.2%46	31.9%54	14.8%64	34.1%62	46.8%68	66.4%38	22.1%82	45.9%16
Angelo Ciaravino	537	1,620	24.9%	8.662	113.560	104.954	48.9%38	40.1%82	16.0%54	30.2%50	49.3%56	69.3%52	19.8%68	42.2%20
Luke Hunger	476	1,681	22.1%	-0.946	108.548	109.444	47.7%32	36.1%70	15.5%58	27.3%42	55.4%28	71.4%60	19.9%70	34.6%36
Jordan Clayton	366	1,791	17.0%	-2.244	101.732	103.958	50.6%46	26.5%32	17.2%44	27.7%42	48.8%58	69.1%50	19.4%66	34.7%36
Keenan Fitzmorris	310	1,847	14.4%	-9.432	113.060	122.416	54.4%64	33.3%62	17.8%42	24.4%32	54.3%32	57.4%12	16.9%48	35.6%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Nick Martinelli	1,997	160	92.6%	3.452	110.052	106.650	52.6%56	30.9%50	18.1%38	30.9%52	52.0%44	71.3%60	18.8%62	49.6%12
Ty Berry	1,589	569	73.6%	15.572	118.272	102.760	49.7%40	39.1%78	14.4%66	36.4%68	47.6%64	68.9%50	19.6%68	37.4%28
Matthew Nicholson	1,299	858	60.2%	0.448	114.864	114.532	51.0%48	35.6%68	15.4%60	34.5%62	54.0%34	65.6%36	18.4%60	40.9%22
Justin Mullins	1,173	985	54.4%	2.050	108.448	106.352	49.1%38	33.6%62	15.3%60	28.3%44	49.5%56	62.7%26	21.1%76	35.2%34
Jalen Leach	1,161	996	53.8%	1.650	106.542	104.954	48.9%38	32.7%58	16.5%50	31.1%54	50.0%54	69.2%50	20.2%72	40.4%22
Brooks Barnhizer	1,008	1,149	46.7%	5.756	109.852	104.056	50.3%46	32.9%58	15.7%58	30.3%50	49.6%56	67.6%44	20.8%74	38.1%26
K.J. Windham	752	1,405	34.9%	1.950	110.452	108.546	49.7%40	34.8%66	15.5%58	29.9%50	51.5%46	66.6%38	19.3%66	31.9%42
Angelo Ciaravino	537	1,620	24.9%	4.054	109.952	105.952	50.1%46	31.6%54	15.0%62	31.8%54	50.1%50	65.6%36	20.5%72	34.8%34
Luke Hunger	476	1,681	22.1%	6.860	111.456	104.656	50.4%46	33.1%58	15.2%60	32.6%58	48.4%60	65.3%36	20.4%72	37.0%30
Jordan Clayton	366	1,791	17.0%	6.658	112.658	106.052	49.7%40	35.1%66	14.8%64	32.0%56	50.1%50	66.0%38	20.5%72	36.9%30
Keenan Fitzmorris	310	1,847	14.4%	7.560	110.452	102.960	49.1%38	33.9%62	14.8%64	32.5%58	49.1%56	68.0%46	20.9%74	36.7%30

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.