Oklahoma21-16

SECCoach: Porter Moser

21-16NET#47

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzayvier Brown	1,930	492	79.7%	−21.94	−12.16	+9.88	−6.36	−4.016	+0.442	−0.052	+8.40	+1.062	+0.560	−2.866
Nijel Pack	1,836	586	75.8%	+9.284	+13.198	+3.926	+6.096	+0.556	−2.484	−5.324	+1.730	+2.980	−2.712	+1.938
Tae Davis	1,765	656	72.9%	+3.062	+2.162	−0.854	+1.668	+1.264	+0.148	−3.732	−1.768	+0.150	−1.624	+0.348
Derrion Reid	1,636	785	67.6%	−16.88	−8.014	+8.810	−2.724	−3.222	+1.526	+8.590	+8.70	+1.768	+0.154	−9.590
Mohamed Wague	1,302	1,120	53.8%	+4.770	+0.756	−4.072	−0.150	+8.398	+2.316	−1.840	−2.272	+1.262	−0.936	−3.972
Jadon Jones	1,048	1,373	43.3%	+10.888	+1.862	−9.090	−1.040	+2.072	−0.658	+7.386	−6.494	+1.060	+1.272	+13.72
Dayton Forsythe	774	1,648	31.9%	−4.234	−6.818	−2.664	−2.426	−1.934	+1.132	+5.680	−4.186	−5.88	+0.662	−2.664
Kirill Elatontsev	539	1,882	22.3%	+1.758	+5.178	+3.430	+3.182	−8.64	−3.290	−5.424	+2.226	+0.556	−0.444	+2.434
Kuol Atak	519	1,903	21.4%	+7.980	+6.484	−1.458	+2.778	+2.374	−1.168	−9.210	−2.776	−1.138	+0.254	−3.268
Jeff Nwankwo	444	1,977	18.3%	+6.676	+1.962	−4.774	+1.466	+2.374	+0.638	−2.338	−1.666	−2.228	+2.688	+0.546
Kai Rogers	295	2,126	12.2%	−8.122	−7.816	+0.348	−1.436	−7.16	+0.638	−0.848	+0.544	+0.658	+0.254	−4.574

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzayvier Brown	1,930	492	79.7%	2.550	116.564	114.034	53.6%56	32.0%58	14.5%60	35.8%56	53.1%40	67.3%38	15.9%48	34.9%42
Nijel Pack	1,836	586	75.8%	9.262	122.176	112.936	56.3%68	32.9%62	13.8%66	34.5%54	51.7%46	67.7%40	15.1%42	36.0%38
Tae Davis	1,765	656	72.9%	7.860	119.572	111.740	55.3%64	33.1%62	14.4%60	34.8%54	50.8%50	67.0%38	15.4%44	35.6%40
Derrion Reid	1,636	785	67.6%	1.648	116.364	114.732	54.0%58	31.7%58	14.9%58	38.7%64	54.0%36	67.6%38	15.9%48	32.5%48
Mohamed Wague	1,302	1,120	53.8%	9.262	119.272	110.144	54.8%62	36.6%74	15.4%52	34.9%54	50.3%52	67.5%38	15.4%44	33.7%44
Jadon Jones	1,048	1,373	43.3%	13.068	119.972	107.050	54.3%60	33.9%66	14.0%64	39.9%66	47.7%66	67.5%38	16.5%52	43.2%24
Dayton Forsythe	774	1,648	31.9%	4.152	114.360	110.144	53.2%54	31.5%56	15.1%54	39.6%64	48.5%62	63.2%24	16.3%50	33.7%44
Kirill Elatontsev	539	1,882	22.3%	8.360	122.978	114.532	57.3%72	26.1%34	11.9%78	31.6%46	53.0%40	67.4%38	15.6%46	37.4%36
Kuol Atak	519	1,903	21.4%	13.268	124.080	110.842	56.9%72	34.6%68	13.5%68	28.6%38	49.1%58	66.1%32	16.0%48	32.9%46
Jeff Nwankwo	444	1,977	18.3%	12.366	120.474	108.148	56.0%66	34.7%68	14.9%58	33.9%52	50.0%58	65.3%30	17.9%64	35.8%40
Kai Rogers	295	2,126	12.2%	-0.146	112.154	112.238	53.6%56	26.6%36	14.9%58	35.1%54	51.7%46	67.5%38	16.0%48	31.6%50

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Xzayvier Brown	1,930	492	79.7%	24.382	128.586	104.258	59.9%82	36.1%74	14.0%64	35.8%56	44.7%78	66.2%32	15.4%44	37.7%34
Nijel Pack	1,836	586	75.8%	-0.146	108.946	109.046	50.3%42	32.5%60	16.2%46	39.8%66	50.0%58	64.8%28	17.9%62	34.0%44
Tae Davis	1,765	656	72.9%	4.854	117.466	112.538	53.7%56	31.9%58	14.3%62	38.5%62	52.6%42	67.0%38	17.0%56	35.2%40
Derrion Reid	1,636	785	67.6%	18.576	124.380	105.954	56.7%70	34.9%68	13.4%68	30.2%42	45.3%76	65.9%32	15.7%46	42.0%26
Mohamed Wague	1,302	1,120	53.8%	4.454	118.570	114.134	54.9%62	28.3%44	13.1%70	36.8%58	52.5%44	66.4%32	16.3%50	37.6%34
Jadon Jones	1,048	1,373	43.3%	2.250	118.168	116.030	55.3%64	31.9%58	14.6%58	32.6%48	54.1%36	66.6%32	15.3%44	29.5%56
Dayton Forsythe	774	1,648	31.9%	8.460	121.174	112.736	55.6%66	33.4%66	14.0%64	34.0%52	52.6%42	69.0%46	15.6%46	36.3%38
Kirill Elatontsev	539	1,882	22.3%	6.658	117.868	111.240	54.2%58	34.7%68	15.1%56	37.0%60	50.8%50	66.9%38	15.9%48	34.9%42
Kuol Atak	519	1,903	21.4%	5.454	117.566	112.238	54.3%58	32.3%60	14.6%58	37.8%62	51.8%46	67.2%38	15.8%48	36.1%38
Jeff Nwankwo	444	1,977	18.3%	5.756	118.670	112.836	54.6%60	32.4%60	14.3%62	36.2%58	51.6%48	67.4%38	15.3%44	35.4%40
Kai Rogers	295	2,126	12.2%	8.060	119.972	111.940	55.1%62	33.6%66	14.3%62	35.9%56	51.2%50	66.9%38	15.8%48	36.0%38

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.