Oregon St.20-12

WCCCoach: Wayne Tinkle

20-12NET#74

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,634	405	80.1%	−8.522	−2.638	+5.920	−2.724	+0.052	−1.268	−5.920	+4.410	+2.272	−1.724	−4.976
Michael Rataj	1,603	436	78.6%	+6.576	+5.378	−1.256	+0.860	−0.448	−4.394	−4.826	+1.236	+3.986	−2.614	−16.598
Liutauras Lelevicius	1,385	654	67.9%	−7.924	−4.726	+3.232	+2.174	−0.646	+3.58	−2.338	+0.542	+1.466	−2.316	−1.658
Nate Kingz	1,319	720	64.7%	+2.460	+1.056	−1.456	+2.274	−3.720	−1.166	−8.610	+1.138	+1.668	+0.152	−2.966
Parsa Fallah	1,205	834	59.1%	+8.582	+7.084	−1.558	+2.880	−5.012	−5.096	−0.748	−0.556	−0.448	+0.254	−3.970
Josiah Lake II	1,155	884	56.7%	+1.256	−0.648	−1.860	−1.338	+1.868	+0.246	+10.094	−3.382	−2.328	+2.182	+11.46
Isaiah Sy	911	1,128	44.7%	−5.830	−3.532	+2.336	−3.916	+5.792	+2.120	+3.370	+1.038	+1.768	−0.150	+7.114
Matthew Marsh	349	1,690	17.1%	−6.128	−4.926	+1.242	+1.870	−0.546	+4.72	−10.48	+0.148	+0.556	−1.526	−0.250
Maxim Logue	205	1,834	10.1%	−14.610	−5.424	+9.210	+0.556	+2.776	+4.92	−6.118	+1.830	−0.546	−4.64	+3.728
Johan Munch	156	1,883	7.7%	+3.564	−5.424	−8.988	−6.56	+3.178	−1.876	+6.786	−3.280	−4.314	+8.1100	−6.382
Ja'Quavis Williford	101	1,938	4.9%	+16.896	+12.396	−4.574	+7.198	+0.254	+2.912	+2.768	−2.978	−8.94	+2.688	−1.658

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,634	405	80.1%	7.760	117.970	110.242	54.0%62	35.6%68	16.8%48	37.5%70	51.9%44	69.5%52	16.5%46	31.0%44
Michael Rataj	1,603	436	78.6%	10.866	119.674	108.846	54.6%64	35.5%68	16.2%54	37.7%70	51.3%48	69.9%54	16.3%44	28.7%52
Liutauras Lelevicius	1,385	654	67.9%	6.960	116.968	110.142	55.2%68	35.3%68	18.2%38	37.9%70	51.2%48	69.5%52	16.1%42	31.4%42
Nate Kingz	1,319	720	64.7%	10.264	118.872	108.646	55.2%68	34.2%64	16.7%48	35.6%66	51.4%46	69.6%54	16.9%48	30.9%44
Parsa Fallah	1,205	834	59.1%	12.968	121.378	108.546	55.6%70	33.4%62	15.0%62	38.4%70	50.9%50	68.9%50	16.9%48	30.3%46
Josiah Lake II	1,155	884	56.7%	9.964	118.272	108.346	53.9%62	36.3%70	17.1%46	43.0%78	49.6%56	68.0%46	17.7%54	37.0%30
Isaiah Sy	911	1,128	44.7%	6.258	116.568	110.342	52.3%54	38.6%78	18.2%38	40.5%74	51.6%46	70.0%56	16.8%48	36.0%32
Matthew Marsh	349	1,690	17.1%	4.354	114.462	110.142	56.0%70	35.1%68	20.9%22	30.0%50	51.1%48	69.4%52	15.6%40	31.8%42
Maxim Logue	205	1,834	10.1%	-3.740	113.660	117.326	54.9%66	38.0%76	21.5%18	33.1%58	52.7%40	68.5%48	12.7%20	35.3%34
Johan Munch	156	1,883	7.7%	12.668	113.560	100.966	48.5%36	38.4%76	15.4%60	44.9%82	48.1%62	65.1%34	24.3%88	26.1%60
Ja'Quavis Williford	101	1,938	4.9%	25.384	130.190	104.856	61.3%88	35.7%70	19.9%26	41.3%76	48.4%60	60.6%20	19.3%66	30.4%46

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,634	405	80.1%	16.274	120.576	104.356	56.7%74	35.5%68	18.0%40	43.5%80	47.5%64	67.3%42	18.2%58	35.9%32
Michael Rataj	1,603	436	78.6%	4.254	114.362	110.042	53.8%62	35.9%70	20.4%24	42.5%78	50.1%50	66.0%38	18.9%62	45.2%16
Liutauras Lelevicius	1,385	654	67.9%	14.872	121.778	106.950	53.1%58	36.0%70	14.7%64	40.2%74	50.7%50	68.0%46	18.4%60	33.0%38
Nate Kingz	1,319	720	64.7%	7.960	117.870	109.942	53.1%58	37.9%76	17.8%40	44.3%80	50.4%50	68.0%46	16.8%46	33.8%38
Parsa Fallah	1,205	834	59.1%	4.454	114.362	109.942	52.8%56	38.5%78	20.0%26	39.1%72	51.4%46	69.2%52	16.7%46	34.3%36
Josiah Lake II	1,155	884	56.7%	8.762	118.872	110.142	55.2%68	34.5%64	17.0%46	33.1%58	52.9%38	70.4%56	15.6%40	25.6%62
Isaiah Sy	911	1,128	44.7%	12.068	120.076	108.148	56.2%72	33.0%58	16.1%54	37.2%68	50.6%50	68.3%46	16.8%48	28.9%52
Matthew Marsh	349	1,690	17.1%	10.464	119.374	108.844	54.2%62	35.6%68	16.3%52	40.4%74	51.1%48	68.9%50	17.1%50	32.0%42
Maxim Logue	205	1,834	10.1%	10.966	119.072	108.146	54.4%64	35.3%68	16.6%50	39.3%72	50.9%50	69.1%50	17.3%52	31.5%42
Johan Munch	156	1,883	7.7%	9.162	118.972	109.842	55.0%66	35.3%68	17.2%44	38.1%70	51.3%48	69.3%52	16.2%44	32.4%40
Ja'Quavis Williford	101	1,938	4.9%	8.662	117.870	109.344	54.1%62	35.5%68	16.9%46	38.5%72	51.2%48	69.5%52	16.7%46	32.0%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.