Poss2,004
Net Rtg4.052
ORtg109.046
DRtg105.056
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,004 | 1,014 | 4.052 | 109.046 | 105.056 | 52.5%52 | 35.2%70 | 20.2%20 | 30.8%44 | 49.9%58 | 75.0%70 | 15.0%42 | 36.4%38 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonJackI. JackRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightRochelinJ. Rochelin | 539 | 295 | 19.076 | 120.172 | 101.166 | 57.9%76 | 38.2%80 | 19.1%26 | 26.5%32 | 47.7%66 | 75.8%74 | 14.2%36 | 31.5%50 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightRochelinJ. RochelinPittJ. Pitt | 143 | 77 | -18.618 | 102.832 | 121.420 | 46.0%24 | 32.9%62 | 17.5%36 | 33.6%52 | 57.5%22 | 65.8%32 | 15.1%42 | 32.1%48 |
| KublickasK. KublickasJackI. JackRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightRochelinJ. Rochelin | 123 | 63 | -15.922 | 91.412 | 107.350 | 46.7%26 | 46.0%94 | 29.4%0 | 18.9%14 | 53.6%38 | 79.3%84 | 16.3%50 | 39.2%32 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightPittJ. Pitt | 88 | 39 | -7.034 | 98.924 | 105.954 | 51.4%46 | 26.2%34 | 20.5%18 | 29.6%40 | 50.9%50 | 64.3%26 | 20.9%80 | 68.4%4 |
| KublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightRochelinJ. RochelinPittJ. Pitt | 77 | 42 | -18.618 | 103.934 | 122.518 | 46.2%24 | 32.5%60 | 18.2%32 | 31.8%46 | 50.6%52 | 58.0%12 | 13.6%30 | 34.6%42 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightIbekweK. IbekweRochelinJ. Rochelin | 76 | 36 | 2.048 | 110.048 | 108.048 | 56.9%70 | 18.8%12 | 15.7%50 | 44.8%74 | 46.6%70 | 75.0%70 | 13.8%32 | 51.7%12 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasJackI. JackRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. Wainwright | 69 | 30 | 13.868 | 100.828 | 86.988 | 46.4%24 | 31.3%54 | 20.2%20 | 40.0%66 | 41.8%86 | 81.0%88 | 15.3%44 | 32.7%46 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasJackI. JackRalphE. RalphRochelinJ. Rochelin | 64 | 33 | 23.882 | 116.766 | 92.982 | 56.7%70 | 37.5%76 | 18.7%28 | 15.0%8 | 44.3%78 | 86.2%96 | 18.0%64 | 70.5%2 |
| KublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightIbekweK. IbekweRochelinJ. Rochelin | 56 | 29 | -19.118 | 108.946 | 128.010 | 57.0%72 | 36.0%72 | 23.2%8 | 44.2%74 | 60.8%14 | 69.2%46 | 13.6%32 | 31.4%52 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonJackI. JackWainwrightT. WainwrightRochelinJ. RochelinPittJ. Pitt | 37 | 16 | 12.566 | 110.248 | 97.772 | 53.3%54 | 25.0%28 | 16.1%46 | 36.7%58 | 45.0%76 | 76.2%76 | 17.2%58 | 26.7%64 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightIbekweK. Ibekwe | 37 | 15 | 48.398 | 119.772 | 71.498 | 59.7%80 | 31.3%54 | 16.3%46 | 32.3%48 | 38.9%92 | 87.0%96 | 22.2%86 | 59.3%6 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightIbekweK. IbekwePittJ. Pitt | 36 | 17 | 27.686 | 134.292 | 106.652 | 57.4%74 | 26.3%34 | 5.6%96 | 29.4%40 | 44.8%78 | 83.3%94 | 8.6%8 | 41.4%26 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonJackI. JackMarmolejosA. MarmolejosRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. Wainwright | 35 | 16 | -5.536 | 96.420 | 101.964 | 46.4%24 | 16.7%8 | 17.0%40 | 32.1%48 | 51.5%48 | 86.4%96 | 8.3%6 | 21.2%80 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonJackI. JackRalphE. RalphWainwrightT. WainwrightPittJ. Pitt | 34 | 17 | 23.482 | 121.776 | 98.272 | 64.0%90 | 30.8%52 | 20.8%16 | 48.0%80 | 48.4%62 | 68.4%42 | 13.6%32 | 45.2%20 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphRochelinJ. RochelinPittJ. Pitt | 30 | 17 | 2.550 | 92.014 | 89.586 | 50.0%36 | 31.6%56 | 29.6%0 | 11.5%4 | 45.3%74 | 75.0%70 | 19.9%76 | 34.4%42 |
| ClaytonJ. ClaytonKublickasK. KublickasRalphE. RalphIbekweK. IbekweRochelinJ. Rochelin | 30 | 15 | -8.432 | 109.246 | 117.626 | 48.1%30 | 44.4%94 | 23.2%8 | 42.3%70 | 56.5%26 | 84.6%94 | 13.4%30 | 43.5%22 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

