On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,079 | 1,007 | -9.7— | 108.7— | 118.4— | 52.7%— | 25.7%— | 15.8%— | 34.4%— | 58.7%— | 68.3%— | 17.5%— | 28.1%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VStewartD. StewartJuricI. JuricMingoK. Mingo | 217 | 107 | -2.1— | 110.1— | 112.2— | 60.1%— | 14.0%— | 16.6%— | 31.5%— | 57.2%— | 70.5%— | 19.6%— | 23.3%— |
| ReedJ. ReedStewartD. StewartRiceE. RiceJuricI. JuricMingoK. Mingo | 116 | 60 | -7.6— | 112.0— | 119.6— | 63.7%— | 15.9%— | 19.0%— | 42.9%— | 58.4%— | 69.0%— | 15.9%— | 19.5%— |
| ReedJ. ReedRiceE. RiceJuricI. JuricMingoK. MingoTuncaM. Tunca | 106 | 50 | 8.7— | 125.4— | 116.7— | 61.5%— | 30.0%— | 15.1%— | 43.7%— | 61.6%— | 73.8%— | 21.3%— | 24.4%— |
| ReedJ. ReedStewartD. StewartJuricI. JuricMingoK. MingoTuncaM. Tunca | 90 | 45 | -8.8— | 118.8— | 127.6— | 55.6%— | 33.3%— | 14.4%— | 52.8%— | 72.2%— | 63.0%— | 25.5%— | 23.6%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VRiceE. RiceJuricI. JuricMingoK. Mingo | 80 | 37 | 13.3— | 119.3— | 106.0— | 56.7%— | 25.0%— | 10.0%— | 18.7%— | 48.5%— | 65.0%— | 17.2%— | 29.9%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VJuricI. JuricMingoK. MingoTuncaM. Tunca | 79 | 38 | -32.1— | 100.2— | 132.3— | 41.0%— | 25.0%— | 12.7%— | 40.3%— | 62.9%— | 61.8%— | 15.6%— | 24.3%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VStewartD. StewartMingoK. MingoTuncaM. Tunca | 58 | 29 | -10.6— | 113.0— | 123.6— | 52.1%— | 34.6%— | 17.4%— | 37.5%— | 65.6%— | 61.1%— | 22.0%— | 37.8%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VRiceE. RiceJuricI. JuricTuncaM. Tunca | 56 | 27 | -17.7— | 112.0— | 129.7— | 55.1%— | 27.3%— | 16.0%— | 18.4%— | 56.6%— | 67.9%— | 9.8%— | 43.4%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VStewartD. StewartRiceE. RiceJuricI. Juric | 49 | 28 | 3.0— | 119.0— | 116.0— | 59.5%— | 25.0%— | 16.4%— | 23.8%— | 59.5%— | 57.9%— | 20.9%— | 38.1%— |
| Dilione VF. Dilione VStewartD. StewartCianiS. CianiMirticT. MirticTuncaM. Tunca | 45 | 22 | 22.6— | 132.1— | 109.6— | 61.8%— | 37.5%— | 13.4%— | 36.8%— | 62.9%— | 80.0%— | 21.0%— | 11.4%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VStewartD. StewartJuricI. JuricTuncaM. Tunca | 44 | 21 | 24.3— | 133.3— | 109.0— | 62.5%— | 29.4%— | 16.1%— | 62.5%— | 50.0%— | 63.6%— | 14.9%— | 12.5%— |
| ReedJ. ReedStewartD. StewartRiceE. RiceJuricI. JuricTuncaM. Tunca | 31 | 17 | 42.3— | 139.9— | 97.6— | 57.1%— | 33.3%— | 15.9%— | 104.8%— | 44.4%— | 73.3%— | 18.3%— | 29.6%— |
| ReedJ. ReedRiceE. RiceCianiS. CianiMingoK. MingoTuncaM. Tunca | 31 | 15 | 33.1— | 123.7— | 90.6— | 58.0%— | 26.7%— | 13.0%— | 48.0%— | 52.1%— | 61.5%— | 32.4%— | 16.7%— |
| ReedJ. ReedDilione VF. Dilione VBlackwoodM. BlackwoodJuricI. JuricMingoK. Mingo | 30 | 15 | -37.8— | 92.2— | 130.0— | 48.0%— | 23.1%— | 19.8%— | 20.0%— | 68.8%— | 63.6%— | 15.1%— | 70.8%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
