Portland13-19

WCCCoach: Shantay Legans

13-19NET#233

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joel Foxwell	1,982	235	89.4%	+0.954	+5.078	+4.026	+2.174	+1.062	−1.270	−6.916	+4.610	−0.248	+0.560	−11.294
Garrett Nuckolls	1,427	790	64.4%	+14.594	+7.386	−7.286	+4.088	+2.574	+1.920	+10.996	−3.884	−5.110	+1.980	−0.956
James O'Donnell	1,212	1,005	54.7%	−4.036	−3.632	+0.446	+2.274	−0.942	+3.38	+1.560	+0.148	+2.374	−2.020	−5.880
Cameron Williams	1,186	1,030	53.5%	−13.012	−3.830	+9.38	−1.930	−0.052	−0.252	−10.48	+5.28	−4.612	−0.542	+0.546
Mikah Ballew	1,185	1,032	53.4%	+1.758	−0.250	−1.960	−0.842	−1.538	−0.760	+3.370	−2.272	+2.374	−0.934	+6.616
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	1,122	1,095	50.6%	−3.836	−2.438	+1.340	−2.724	−1.538	−0.862	−1.444	+0.248	−0.150	−1.328	−9.690
Dante Censori-Hercules	1,109	1,108	50.0%	+8.582	+6.584	−2.060	+1.466	+4.588	−1.166	+0.154	−1.768	+2.374	−1.034	−3.068
Matúš Hronský	930	1,287	42.0%	+0.152	+1.258	+1.142	−0.348	+1.062	−2.182	−11.76	+2.820	+1.668	+1.880	+5.122
Timo George	473	1,744	21.3%	+10.788	−2.040	−12.696	−0.446	+0.758	+0.542	+6.684	−5.192	−0.248	+5.5100	+6.516
NaVaughn Long	208	2,009	9.4%	−17.96	−7.816	+10.26	−2.524	−5.98	+1.526	−3.134	+1.434	−2.030	−2.020	+5.918
Kelson Gebbers	122	2,094	5.5%	−15.28	−14.04	+1.242	−10.02	−5.510	−0.558	+15.2100	−1.768	+7.198	−2.712	+22.30

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joel Foxwell	1,982	235	89.4%	-8.032	103.634	111.640	51.6%46	28.3%44	19.2%26	33.8%52	53.2%40	67.5%38	17.2%58	31.2%52
Garrett Nuckolls	1,427	790	64.4%	-3.040	105.738	108.746	52.9%52	29.1%46	20.0%20	38.6%62	51.4%48	65.8%32	17.8%62	32.2%48
James O'Donnell	1,212	1,005	54.7%	-9.930	101.528	111.440	52.4%50	27.7%40	20.8%16	35.2%54	52.7%42	68.5%42	16.2%50	29.9%56
Cameron Williams	1,186	1,030	53.5%	-14.224	101.328	115.530	50.5%42	28.1%44	19.2%24	29.8%40	55.1%32	65.3%30	16.9%56	32.7%46
Mikah Ballew	1,185	1,032	53.4%	-7.334	103.032	110.342	51.0%44	27.5%40	19.0%26	36.0%56	51.6%48	68.6%44	16.7%54	35.6%40
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	1,122	1,095	50.6%	-10.030	101.930	111.940	50.1%42	27.4%40	18.9%28	33.8%52	52.7%42	67.5%38	16.5%52	27.8%62
Dante Censori-Hercules	1,109	1,108	50.0%	-3.940	106.338	110.244	52.0%50	30.4%52	18.8%28	34.5%54	51.8%46	68.6%44	16.6%54	31.0%52
Matúš Hronský	930	1,287	42.0%	-8.132	103.834	111.840	51.2%44	28.7%46	18.1%32	27.9%36	54.4%34	68.5%42	18.1%64	35.5%40
Timo George	473	1,744	21.3%	0.246	101.528	101.366	51.1%44	28.7%46	19.7%22	39.7%66	48.6%62	67.4%38	21.4%82	37.7%34
NaVaughn Long	208	2,009	9.4%	-24.414	96.018	120.422	49.1%36	22.7%22	20.6%18	31.7%46	53.9%36	65.7%32	15.3%44	37.8%34
Kelson Gebbers	122	2,094	5.5%	-22.514	89.912	112.438	41.8%12	23.0%24	18.8%28	48.9%82	51.0%50	74.2%68	14.6%38	53.6%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Joel Foxwell	1,982	235	89.4%	-9.030	98.624	107.650	49.5%36	27.3%40	20.4%18	40.7%66	48.5%62	67.7%40	16.7%54	42.4%24
Garrett Nuckolls	1,427	790	64.4%	-17.520	98.422	115.930	48.9%34	26.6%36	18.1%32	27.6%36	55.1%32	70.9%54	15.9%48	33.0%46
James O'Donnell	1,212	1,005	54.7%	-6.036	105.036	111.042	50.2%42	28.6%46	17.5%36	33.7%52	52.6%42	66.3%32	18.2%66	35.7%40
Cameron Williams	1,186	1,030	53.5%	-1.244	105.136	106.352	52.4%50	28.2%44	19.4%24	40.2%66	49.9%58	69.9%48	17.4%60	32.2%48
Mikah Ballew	1,185	1,032	53.4%	-9.030	103.232	112.238	51.8%48	29.0%46	19.7%22	32.7%48	53.8%38	66.3%32	17.6%60	29.0%58
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	1,122	1,095	50.6%	-6.234	104.334	110.542	52.8%52	29.0%46	19.7%22	35.2%54	52.6%42	67.5%38	17.8%62	37.4%36
Dante Censori-Hercules	1,109	1,108	50.0%	-12.426	99.826	112.238	50.7%42	25.9%34	19.9%22	34.4%54	53.5%38	66.4%32	17.6%60	34.0%44
Matúš Hronský	930	1,287	42.0%	-8.232	102.630	110.842	51.5%46	27.7%40	20.2%20	39.6%64	51.5%48	66.9%38	16.4%52	30.4%54
Timo George	473	1,744	21.3%	-10.428	103.532	113.934	51.5%46	28.0%42	19.2%24	33.1%50	53.7%38	67.6%38	15.9%48	31.1%52
NaVaughn Long	208	2,009	9.4%	-6.434	103.834	110.244	51.6%46	28.7%46	19.2%26	34.8%54	52.5%42	67.7%40	17.3%60	31.9%50
Kelson Gebbers	122	2,094	5.5%	-7.334	103.834	111.140	51.9%48	28.5%44	19.3%24	33.7%52	52.7%42	67.1%38	17.3%58	31.3%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.