On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 905 | 416 | -9.3— | 97.8— | 107.1— | 45.2%— | 32.2%— | 18.7%— | 30.7%— | 52.3%— | 60.5%— | 25.1%— | 49.0%— |
| Horton Jr.O. Horton Jr.MylesB. MylesLane Jr.C. Lane Jr.HopkinsJ. HopkinsSmith IVC. Smith IV | 87 | 44 | 21.0— | 112.1— | 91.2— | 50.0%— | 42.9%— | 19.5%— | 30.0%— | 42.9%— | 78.7%— | 20.8%— | 52.4%— |
| MylesB. MylesHopkinsJ. HopkinsSmith IVC. Smith IVFelix Jr.C. Felix Jr.GazelasN. Gazelas | 85 | 44 | 32.5— | 118.1— | 85.6— | 52.1%— | 36.4%— | 17.7%— | 47.1%— | 43.7%— | 54.9%— | 34.2%— | 46.0%— |
| MylesB. MylesNunleyA. NunleySmith IVC. Smith IVFelix Jr.C. Felix Jr.GazelasN. Gazelas | 81 | 39 | -6.9— | 100.1— | 107.0— | 42.4%— | 29.2%— | 13.6%— | 34.7%— | 58.9%— | 70.3%— | 22.9%— | 32.3%— |
| MylesB. MylesHopkinsJ. HopkinsSmith IVC. Smith IVGazelasN. GazelasMcGaskeyK. McGaskey | 49 | 24 | -53.7— | 61.5— | 115.1— | 29.1%— | 16.7%— | 16.4%— | 18.6%— | 48.9%— | 47.1%— | 24.2%— | 43.5%— |
| MylesB. MylesLane Jr.C. Lane Jr.HopkinsJ. HopkinsSmith IVC. Smith IVMcGaskeyK. McGaskey | 35 | 18 | 25.1— | 112.4— | 87.3— | 45.6%— | 37.5%— | 11.5%— | 35.3%— | 53.8%— | 62.5%— | 34.9%— | 19.2%— |
| Horton Jr.O. Horton Jr.MylesB. MylesSmith IVC. Smith IVGazelasN. GazelasMcGaskeyK. McGaskey | 31 | 13 | 14.2— | 106.5— | 92.3— | 53.2%— | 31.3%— | 16.1%— | 0.0%— | 56.5%— | 70.0%— | 31.8%— | 13.0%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
