Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big East
Providence logo

Providence

27-6NET#35Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #62Coach: Ed Cooley
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WFairfield logoWSacred Heart logoWWisconsin logoWNew Hampshire logoWNorthwestern logoLVirginia logoWSaint Peter's logoWTexas Tech logoWRhode Island logoWVermont logoWCentral Connecticut logoWConnecticut logoWSeton Hall logoWDePaul logoLMarquette logoWSt. John's logoWGeorgetown logoWButler logoWXavier logoWMarquette logoWSt. John's logoWGeorgetown logoWDePaul logoLVillanova logoWButler logoWXavier logoWCreighton logoLVillanova logoWButler logoLCreighton logoR1WSouth Dakota St. logoR2WRichmond logoS16LKansas logo

Team Stats

33 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating8.273
  • Offensive Rating109.570
  • Defensive Rating101.365
  • Pace65.331
  • Effective FG%50.0%44
  • Off Rebound Pct30.3%72
  • Turnover Pct17.5%76
  • FT Attempt Rate37.0%93

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct81.8%97
  • Point Margin / Game5.372
  • Points / Game71.555
  • Points Allowed / Game66.276
  • 1st Half Margin2.061
  • 2nd Half Margin3.480
  • Avg Largest Lead12.560
  • Avg Largest Deficit7.284

Box Score

  • Points / Game71.555
  • Rebounds / Game37.684
  • Assists / Game13.254
  • ORebs / Game10.564
  • DRebs / Game27.187
  • Steals / Game5.09
  • Blocks / Game3.770
  • Turnovers / Game11.482
  • PFs / Game16.063

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game24.528
  • FGAs / Game56.329
  • Field Goal Pct43.5%41
  • 2PMs / Game17.128
  • 2PAs / Game34.938
  • 2-Point Pct49.0%34
  • 3PMs / Game7.451
  • 3PAs / Game21.445
  • 3-Point Pct34.4%61
  • FTMs / Game15.293
  • FTAs / Game20.891
  • Free Throw Pct72.8%62

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s47.9%25
  • % Pts from 3s30.9%46
  • % Pts from FTs21.2%93
  • Paint Pts / Game22.160
  • % Pts in Paint30.8%56
  • Fast Break Pts / Game5.851
  • % Pts on Fast Break8.1%49
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.48
  • % Pts off TOVs11.8%7
  • 1st Half Pts / Game32.332
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game37.659

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.6%60
  • Points / Shot1.2773
  • 3-Point Att Rate38.0%52
  • Assist Pct54.1%72
  • Assists / 100 Poss20.360
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.16x74
  • PF Drawn / Game18.384

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%46.3%92
  • Opp True Shooting %49.8%94
  • Opp Field Goal Pct40.9%89
  • Opp 2-Point Pct47.0%83
  • Opp 3-Point Pct30.0%93
  • Opp 3PA Rate36.0%67
  • Opp FT Att Rate27.0%75
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1196

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game66.276
  • Paint Pts Allowed19.157
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed5.552
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed8.289
  • Opp Assist Pct46.0%83
  • TOVs Forced / Game10.510

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct72.6%61
  • Turnovers Forced Pct16.0%11
  • Steal Pct7.7%11
  • Block Pct5.6%71
  • Hakeem Pct13.3%28
  • PF Efficiency0.87x94
  • Steals / PF0.31x11
  • Blocks / PF0.23x73

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 358 D-I teams
  • #25FTAR37.0%
  • #25Opp 3P%30.0%
  • #34Opp eFG%46.3%
  • #35Adj ORtg112.8
  • #39SOS8.5
  • #65Adj DRtg98.6
  • #82REB Diff+105
  • #85FB Pts %14.2%
Where they rank worstof 358 D-I teams
  • #321Opp TOV%16.0%
  • #200eFG%50.0%
  • #155Opp OREB%27.4%
  • #148TS%54.0%
  • #1383P%34.4%
  • #117OREB%30.3%
  • #1093PM Diff+31
  • #103Paint Pts %43.0%
Game Log
Loading game log…
N. HorchlerSr6'8"+1.68559.1%7515.5%319.98.51.540.1%76.9%
A.J. ReevesSr6'6"+1.58452.3%4420.3%669.92.82.037.3%78.7%
J. BynumJr5'10"+1.27554.6%5525.7%9012.22.94.041.3%75.2%
N. WatsonSr6'10"+1.27556.6%6423.0%8013.35.20.50.0%58.3%
J. MinayaSr6'7"+1.27451.8%4112.4%146.55.51.631.7%55.8%
A. DurhamSr6'4"+1.06652.0%4224.0%8413.63.43.423.7%83.4%
A. FontsSr6'2"92.2%9711.4%110.80.30.166.7%50.0%
E. CroswellSr6'8"64.5%8718.5%535.34.70.30.0%55.8%
B. GoodineJr6'4"54.5%5417.2%441.90.60.132.0%92.3%
A. BreedSo6'3"43.3%1418.8%553.21.20.821.4%80.9%
M. CaseFr6'5"82.0%9624.1%851.00.50.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Providence logo25-2615-18#759.879120.389110.5469.484+8571+34731.7%57+86755.0%8836.4%8875.7%84
Providence logo24-2512-20#1025.472111.974106.4628.884+12583+638733.2%76+112352.1%6435.6%7768.6%18
Providence logo23-2421-14#5612.685109.36796.7969.391+2751+457627.0%29+133651.5%5732.5%2672.2%52
Providence logo22-231121-12#4213.789116.596102.8686.784+18894-73934.8%9504551.1%5034.6%5674.2%78
Providence logo21-22427-6#3514.290112.89198.6828.589+10577+316830.3%67+322950.0%4334.4%6072.8%61
Providence logo19-2019-12#4512.988106.87393.9937.989+7168+316833.7%92-477947.3%1633.2%4669.4%35
Providence logo18-1918-16#857.576105.25197.7886.883+4761-213431.8%79-356648.0%1432.6%2369.1%34
Providence logo17-181021-14#789.278108.36599.18811.299-1737-203728.9%49-437748.7%1831.6%570.3%36
Providence logo16-171120-13#6210.983107.06696.1908.185-4230+327126.4%20-427351.4%5937.1%7769.1%40
Providence logo15-16924-11#6011.483108.27096.8898.690-3137+286930.4%54-1129648.0%2332.1%1772.5%79
Providence logo14-15622-12#3613.990109.98696.08710.598+13584-471935.1%84-357148.4%3831.3%1570.7%67
Providence logo13-141122-13#5511.485113.290101.7718.289+11179+306835.3%85+213648.3%3234.7%5378.2%100

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
54.0%#148
Effective FG %
50.0%#200
3-Point %
34.4%#138
3PAR
38.0%#169
FTAR
37.0%#25
Assist %
54.1%#100

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
35.3%#168
Rim FG %
57.5%#134
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.9%#154
Mid-range FG %
28.7%#318
Corner 3 shareof all threes taken
18.2%#156
Corner 3 FG %
34.9%#171
Above-break 3 FG %
39.4%#16

Shot clock

19 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 40.1% of shots at 0.91 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0940.1%0.91Middle (11–20s): 28.4% of shots at 1.03 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0428.4%1.03Late (21s+): 31.5% of shots at 1.05 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9731.5%1.05SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 42.1% of shots at 0.74 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0742.1%0.74Middle (11–20s): 31.8% of shots at 1.00 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0231.8%1.00Late (21s+): 26.1% of shots at 0.97 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9526.1%0.97SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

19 games
Created byFinished by
Jared Bynum → Nate Watson: 5 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Jared Bynum → Noah Horchler: 19 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 17 from three)Jared Bynum → A.J. Reeves: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Jared Bynum → Justin Minaya: 11 assisted baskets (4 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Jared Bynum → Ed Croswell: 8 assisted baskets (7 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)A.J. Reeves → Nate Watson: 11 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)A.J. Reeves → Noah Horchler: 9 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)A.J. Reeves → Ed Croswell: 6 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Justin Minaya → Nate Watson: 9 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)Justin Minaya → Noah Horchler: 6 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Justin Minaya → A.J. Reeves: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 7 from three)Noah Horchler → Nate Watson: 13 assisted baskets (9 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 0 from three)Noah Horchler → Justin Minaya: 5 assisted baskets (3 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 2 from three)Nate Watson → A.J. Reeves: 8 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 5 from three)Bynum51 astReeves26 astMinaya23 astHorchler18 astWatson8 astWatson38 madeHorchler34 madeReeves24 madeMinaya16 madeCroswell14 made
Bynum is the least-assisted finisher — 92% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 21-22. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 21-22. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.