Poss2,466
Net Rtg16.574
ORtg124.882
DRtg108.348
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 2,466 | 1,265 | 16.574 | 124.882 | 108.348 | 57.8%74 | 36.4%74 | 13.7%66 | 28.9%38 | 52.5%42 | 73.3%64 | 15.1%42 | 25.9%66 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerCoxC. CoxCluffO. Cluff | 741 | 408 | 34.292 | 136.994 | 102.762 | 61.2%86 | 43.1%92 | 11.9%78 | 27.7%36 | 50.9%50 | 77.8%80 | 14.6%38 | 22.6%76 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennJacobsenD. JacobsenSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerHarrisG. Harris | 185 | 89 | 1.948 | 112.654 | 110.742 | 54.4%60 | 31.5%56 | 13.0%70 | 20.3%16 | 52.6%42 | 71.1%54 | 14.6%38 | 22.4%76 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennJacobsenD. JacobsenSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerCoxC. Cox | 135 | 70 | 26.084 | 130.588 | 104.556 | 62.1%88 | 42.9%90 | 18.5%30 | 21.8%20 | 54.1%36 | 80.3%88 | 17.3%60 | 24.4%70 |
| SmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerCoxC. CoxBenterJ. BenterCluffO. Cluff | 133 | 67 | 36.494 | 134.694 | 98.172 | 64.2%92 | 30.4%52 | 11.3%82 | 34.5%54 | 50.4%52 | 70.4%52 | 19.9%76 | 16.7%90 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerCoxC. CoxBenterJ. Benter | 86 | 35 | 29.288 | 133.392 | 104.058 | 61.2%86 | 36.1%74 | 10.4%86 | 39.5%64 | 48.1%64 | 61.9%20 | 24.8%92 | 45.3%20 |
| JacobsenD. JacobsenSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerHarrisG. HarrisBenterJ. Benter | 85 | 43 | -21.716 | 89.812 | 111.540 | 47.2%28 | 20.9%18 | 18.9%26 | 19.7%16 | 58.9%18 | 68.4%42 | 20.3%78 | 10.1%96 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithHarrisG. HarrisCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 67 | 37 | -10.528 | 108.744 | 119.224 | 47.8%30 | 41.5%88 | 13.4%68 | 18.8%14 | 54.0%36 | 66.7%32 | 11.0%16 | 16.1%90 |
| SmithB. SmithHarrisG. HarrisBenterJ. BenterCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 67 | 32 | 3.552 | 123.780 | 120.322 | 63.6%90 | 21.4%20 | 14.9%56 | 30.9%44 | 65.2%6 | 80.8%88 | 16.1%50 | 23.2%74 |
| JacobsenD. JacobsenSmithB. SmithHarrisG. HarrisBenterJ. BenterMayerO. Mayer | 66 | 35 | 25.584 | 141.798 | 116.328 | 63.8%90 | 38.2%80 | 9.1%90 | 24.6%26 | 50.8%52 | 75.0%70 | 7.5%6 | 27.4%62 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithCoxC. CoxCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 64 | 32 | -10.130 | 124.380 | 134.46 | 58.2%76 | 57.1%100 | 18.9%28 | 32.7%48 | 64.4%8 | 77.8%80 | 6.5%4 | 16.9%88 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerHarrisG. HarrisCluffO. Cluff | 57 | 31 | -9.330 | 100.728 | 110.044 | 43.9%16 | 28.1%42 | 15.9%48 | 32.7%48 | 49.1%60 | 64.5%28 | 13.3%30 | 39.6%30 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennLoyerF. LoyerCoxC. CoxCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 51 | 25 | 32.390 | 112.956 | 80.694 | 42.6%14 | 51.9%100 | 15.8%50 | 42.6%70 | 37.3%94 | 67.6%38 | 17.7%62 | 7.8%98 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennJacobsenD. JacobsenSmithB. SmithHarrisG. HarrisMayerO. Mayer | 43 | 24 | -5.436 | 121.576 | 126.912 | 58.8%78 | 32.0%58 | 16.4%46 | 20.0%16 | 62.5%10 | 68.2%42 | 14.6%38 | 42.5%24 |
| SmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerHarrisG. HarrisBenterJ. BenterCluffO. Cluff | 41 | 20 | -27.212 | 95.618 | 122.816 | 48.5%34 | 31.6%56 | 22.1%12 | 23.5%24 | 64.3%8 | 82.4%92 | 15.0%42 | 11.4%96 |
| JacobsenD. JacobsenHarrisG. HarrisBenterJ. BenterMurphyL. MurphyMayerO. Mayer | 39 | 18 | -5.536 | 107.140 | 112.638 | 72.7%98 | 18.2%12 | 35.7%0 | 50.0%82 | 50.0%58 | 77.8%80 | 17.5%60 | 77.8%2 |
| SmithB. SmithCoxC. CoxBenterJ. BenterCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 37 | 17 | 0.646 | 114.158 | 113.634 | 61.7%86 | 26.7%36 | 19.0%26 | 26.7%32 | 58.6%20 | 58.8%14 | 22.7%86 | 37.9%34 |
| Kaufman-RennT. Kaufman-RennSmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 32 | 13 | 45.498 | 149.9100 | 104.456 | 62.5%88 | 40.0%84 | 3.1%98 | 67.9%96 | 50.0%58 | 76.9%78 | 12.0%22 | 17.4%88 |
| SmithB. SmithLoyerF. LoyerBenterJ. BenterCluffO. CluffMayerO. Mayer | 30 | 14 | 33.190 | 128.486 | 95.376 | 65.4%94 | 18.2%12 | 13.2%70 | 19.2%14 | 43.8%80 | 83.3%94 | 10.6%14 | 29.2%58 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

